Re: AR upper question
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Togeneral99</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pupdawg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well, it wouldn't hurt to try it out. The tool is relatively inexpensive:
Brownells AR15 lapping tool I used their #800 grit lapping compound. The pilot of the tool (where it slides into the receiver) was very tight with the CMT upper I have even with generous amounts of lubrication.
My only gripe is that Brownells should have cut the shank of the tool (where the drill attaches) with a couple flats so the chuck can grab it better.
</div></div>
Thanks
I'll have to give this a look although the one's I've seen look relatively easy to make (got a lathe in the basement
) Did you do anything to the mating side of the barrel extension or just trust that it was square to the bore of the barrel and go with it?
Thanks again!
Wes </div></div>
I didn't do anything to the barrel extension. I got a kreiger from Frank White at Compass Lake. Frank does the work himself. I trust his judgment, skill, and of course his reputation to know that the barrel I got from him was done right, and that there are no "accuracy affecting details" that were overlooked.
By truing the receiver I know for sure the barrel nut is exerting the same amount of tension between the barrel extension flange and the receiver face through out the whole circumference.
Again, whether this made a difference or not I have no data, I have no idea.
The rifle did "seem" to get more consistent on paper after the truing, then again there are too many other variables to come to an accurate conclusion.