• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Bipod Options

SN13

SN13

Impatient
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 26, 2009
365
248
West Palm Beach, FL
I owned an Atlas in the past and replaced it with a notched leg harris for the quicker deploying and locked in leg adjustments.

It's been 10 years since I put together a gun so I'm wondering if there are any new bipods I should take a look at?

Pictures and makes/models would help.

Thanks!
 
Seriously though,
in the ten years you haven’t looked at bipods they have multiplied and in a lot of cases specialised to fill certain niches.
Depends a lot on what you are looking to do with one, as to which bipod would be most suitable.
 
i bought an atlas when they first came out i used it one time and sold it...i just decided to try the atlas cal....love this bipod so much i bought one for my vudu....atlas fixed all the things that made me not like them....

www.accu-shot.com

Accu-Shot Monopod Precision Shooting Rifle Rest Magpul PRS Rail

Accu-Shot precision monopods, Atlas bipods and rifle accessories provide a high-degree of accuracy for long-range hunting, law enforcement or military duty.
www.accu-shot.com www.accu-shot.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: fxdrider, Boogieman84 and MakeSawdust
I really like my TBAC bipod. Quick to deploy and stable.

Have a atlas prs not the biggest fan.

Have a Atlas cal coming to try that out.

I also have a LRA tactical and Atlas SCal and they are both great stable bipods they just are on the larger side.

I’m still a big fan of the Harris with a integral picatinny Mount from Larue or ADM?
 
I like both the Atlas Cal and the Harris notched leg for their deferences. I gave up on looking for a do-all bipod, it doesn't exist. Tall and short Atlas and Harris. Also, a Harris requires a pod lock.
 
Last edited:
I have a Thunderbeast for quick deploy, simplicity of use. I have a Ckye Pod with PRS Short Legs if I want more configurability. I run the legs fully extended and super wide for prone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drshoot
I really appreciate all of the new options you guys are providing.

Keep it up if you have any thing that's not shown already.
 
TrevK said:
You might like the Warne Skyline
Click to expand...

TrevK,

To be clear, the Warne Skyline 45* is one direction, and the fast-90 flip down is the other? So the only way to go 45* is to turn the bipod around or 45* towards the shooter?

Just checking that I understand correctly.
 
SN13 said:
TrevK,

To be clear, the Warne Skyline 45* is one direction, and the fast-90 flip down is the other? So the only way to go 45* is to turn the bipod around or 45* towards the shooter?

I’m not to familiar with that bipod as I haven’t owned or used it. I just have read about it lately and it seemed like a more stable version of the Harris. Not gonna lie to ya!

Just checking that I understand correctly.
Click to expand...
 
SN13 said:
Is there a reason we're moving towards mounting rifles to heavy duty camera tripods?

I don't think I'll be taking tripods to the range/woods with me.....
Click to expand...
Yes. To shoot stuff. Me and a pile of other people are taking them to the fields and woods.

Pretty sure RRS are designed specifically for shooting.

3A80E0CD-A694-472F-9352-D91F495E3C68.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mike4837, 260284, joemusso and 1 other person
SN13 said:
Thanks I will check it out.
Click to expand...
I just went with the TBAC. I had a Harris and an Atlas. LOVE the folks at BT. That said, the TBAC ticks off everything I wanted in a bipod. I just love that freakin thing.
 
So maybe one should ask, What is application? LOL Static Range, Dynamic Range, PRS field, hunting, fishing, ELR or squirrel distance

An Atlas from 10 years ago is a model A compared to today's Atlas line-up. You want a bipod for it's go fast features or a bipod with features demanded by SOF around the world? And tripods do make sense unless your climbing for sheep then maybe not so much....
 
Kasey said:
So maybe one should ask, What is application? LOL Static Range, Dynamic Range, PRS field, hunting, fishing, ELR or squirrel distance

An Atlas from 10 years ago is a model A compared to today's Atlas line-up. You want a bipod for it's go fast features or a bipod with features demanded by SOF around the world? And tripods do make sense unless your climbing for sheep then maybe not so much....
Click to expand...

It's just surprising to see so many tripods.

I guess it makes sense when they are 3# and can hold a 30# rifle locked in almost any position.
 
HOLY MACKEREL! This makes my brain hurt. i have not looked into bipods for years now. What in the fuck is the deal with all these 400-700$ bipods! I get the most use out of my Harris. My old Atlas is a better built product but, does not see as much use because the legs rotate more than I like to deal with. I believe that is not an issue on the new models.
 
I picked up a couple new bipods in the last 6 months: TBAC and Atlas SCAL. Both are great. I've used the TBAC on a Barrett MRAD in 338LM and the SCAL on a M99. Both are very stable options with a lot of adjustability. The SCAL is HUGE and, unfortunately, still huge when folded. But so is the rifle so that's nbd.

Tripods are also great but bipods are still essential kit imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VegasFMF
whiskeytower said:
HOLY MACKEREL! This makes my brain hurt. i have not looked into bipods for years now. What in the fuck is the deal with all these 400-700$ bipods! I get the most use out of my Harris. My old Atlas is a better built product but, does not see as much use because the legs rotate more than I like to deal with. I believe that is not an issue on the new models.
Click to expand...

WT, right?

Atlas and Harris were about it, 10 years ago.

Gotta admit that Warne Skyline is Sexy and has my attention.

Now to find one at a discount somewhere...
 
I know the "poors" comments are in jest, and the Revolution is a sweet bipod no doubt, but you don't have to be poor to know when you're getting ripped off and have a natural instinct to avoid it. No way it's worth twice the price of Atlas, TBAC, Warne, etc. It's not made out of adamantium. You have to ask yourself, is the advantage of having the rifle below the legs worth another $400?
 
  • Love
Reactions: whiskeytower
Mooncake said:
I know the "poors" comments are in jest, and the Revolution is a sweet bipod no doubt, but you don't have to be poor to know when you're getting ripped off and have a natural instinct to avoid it. No way it's worth twice the price of Atlas, TBAC, Warne, etc. It's not made out of adamantium. You have to ask yourself, is the advantage of having the rifle below the legs worth another $400?
Click to expand...
My elite iron wasn’t $400 more than my atlas’s.
 
whiskeytower said:
HOLY MACKEREL! This makes my brain hurt. i have not looked into bipods for years now. What in the fuck is the deal with all these 400-700$ bipods! I get the most use out of my Harris. My old Atlas is a better built product but, does not see as much use because the legs rotate more than I like to deal with. I believe that is not an issue on the new models.
Click to expand...
Consider the cost of the rest of the rifle.
Action $1000
Trigger $300
Barrel $700
Chassis/ stock $1000
Scope $2000+

And that's not even an AI with either a ZCO or a Tangent Theta.

Harris bipods are also stamped sheet metal. Sheet metal isn't as repeatable accuracy wise as machined. All of the rest of these are machined.

I'm paraphrasing @Kasey but didn't Harris say something along the lines of why innovate?

BTW love my no dye cal. Finally got it out Saturday. No pics installed yet.
20200122_114458.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lunchbox27, Kasey and deersniper
I’ll offer the knights armament as an option. The atlas feet options are compatible with it. I also have the Atlas 5-H for my heavier rifles
 
Mooncake said:
I know the "poors" comments are in jest, and the Revolution is a sweet bipod no doubt, but you don't have to be poor to know when you're getting ripped off and have a natural instinct to avoid it. No way it's worth twice the price of Atlas, TBAC, Warne, etc. It's not made out of adamantium. You have to ask yourself, is the advantage of having the rifle below the legs worth another $400?
Click to expand...
But ya know, we have to purchase the latest and greatest because.... IDK, since we spend on high end rifles why not piss off as much possible on everything else....🙄
 
@LeftyJason There is no doubt my Atlas is a better built product than my harris and IMO worth the extra =/- 150$ over the Harris price. Im sure the Thunderbeast is a great product as well, everything Thunderbeast makes is great. I must admit the bipod looks interesting. I just cant see spending the kind of dollars some of these bipods are demand. Seems kinda like the 100+ bucks on a rear bags and tactical pillows.
 
@whiskeytower ... What Does a Harris Bipod go for these days? $75ish?

Atlas is like $225 ish? Depending on options.

So a couple of extra bucks ($250-$275 ish) isn't out of the question, but I'm with you on the $800 bipods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whiskeytower
I think by now that the info on bipods in LL's new book are beginning to circulate among those of us who aren't deeply immersed in the competition circuit

I agree that the Harris, while a long trusted legacy, is approaching obsolescence. I have used the Harris for decades, both tilt lock and non-tilt versions; and I much prefer the non-tilt because it's not going to unlock on me. Unfortunately the mounting itself tends to loosen up way too easily; and getting it properly realigned with the stock axis can be troublesome. That's something I have experienced repeatedly, occasionally during an already stressful situation.

I value economy , and also USA sourcing; with UTG Leapers currently offering what I consider a useful Recon-Flex Bipod line that incorporates M-Lok mounting, and an utterly rigid support, adjustable for tilt on a gross scale via notched legs.

Currently below $50, it's not an expensive experiment.

It has five positively locked positions, two for stowage fore or aft; and three more for deployment, vertical and 45 degrees fore or aft. It's rigid in all positions. When stowed, the bottom of handguard is unencumbered; allowing rest, bag, or ruck support. The stowed position allows the forend to provide a far broader and more steady hand grip.

I have the long and the short version and am setting up to get out and test them once the local quarantines are lifted (actually, I tested one already on my PA-10 308, but only ten rounds to verify function with IMI 168 Razor Point. The bipod demonstrated no flex at all, which I suspect could simplify or completely eliminate bipod preload).

I have already encountered one Con, the folded bipod leg may interfere with pop-up ABUIS mounting and stowage. I may need to reposition the ABUIS or the bipod mounting, or both. Testing will tell. (ETA - Reworked the mounting, and the problem was easily resolved).

When shooting from the bench, there is no tilt issue as long as the bench is level and the scope is set up with the reticle level. You open the bipod, emplace the rifle; and you're GTG.

Greg
 
Last edited:
I’m far from an expert, but decided on the Magpul for my bipod. The prices seemed reasonable, and my other Magpul products have been rock solid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Precision Rifle Gear Mountain Bipod (Atlas vs Modular Evolution vs ?)
Replies
4
Views
428
R_A_W
R_A_W
G
TBAC bipod-questions for owners
Replies
14
Views
614
Guns&WhiteWater
Guns&WhiteWater
D
Bipod recommendation
Replies
17
Views
673
kthomas
kthomas
MikeinNC
SOLD Atlas BT10 Bipod with RRS ARCA clamp, Like New $190
Replies
2
Views
172
patscrazy
P
Emmaandhaley
Accessories Larue Harris LM-S BiPod & QD Mount Combo
Replies
7
Views
1K
Laserjock
L
Top Bottom
Back