• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Black Hills MK262 Mod1 Accuracy Evaluation

Molon

Gunny Sergeant
Minuteman
Feb 26, 2020
870
2,271
Black Hills MK262 Mod1 Ammunition




black_hills_box_01_resized-1342439.jpg





The 77 grain MK262 ammunition produced by Black Hills Ammunition has been referred to as the most accurate mass-produced 5.56mm ammunition that has ever been type-classified and issued by the US military. Since its inception, genuine MK262 has been manufactured solely by Black Hills Ammunition. For years, MK262 was only available to the civilian population as “seconds,” but more recently Black Hills has made first-run production lots available on the commercial market. It is the first-run version of MK262 Mod 1 that I tested for this report.

MK262 Mod 1 is loaded in WCC 5.56mm brass and uses a cannelured version of the 77 grain Sierra MatchKing. The round is charged with a proprietary ball powder. The primer pockets are crimped and sealed. Contrary to erroneous information that has been posted on the Internet, MK262 Mod 1 does not have case-mouth sealant.




mk262_casemouth_no_sealant_01_resized-1342448.jpg





mk262_casemouth_no_sealant_02_resized-1342449.jpg





The 77 grain MK262 Mod 1 projectile compared to the M193 projectile.

mk262_canelure_vs_m193_03resized-1342447.jpg





MK262 powder. (The squares of the red grid measure 1/10 of an inch.)

mk262_mod_1_powder_01-1342451.jpg







Velocity


I chronographed the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt M16A2 barrel.




Colt_20_inch_A2_barrel_02_border-1342441.jpg





Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings. If there is, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid. There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.





oehler_chronograph_32-1342454.jpg





oehler_computer_02-1342452.jpg





Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release. Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.



kestrel_4000_21-1342442.jpg





Atmospheric conditions

Temperature: 79 degrees F

Humidity: 37%

Barometric pressure: 30.12 inches of Hg

Elevation: 950 feet above sea level



The muzzle velocity for the 10-shot string of the Black Hills 5.56mm MK262 Mod 1 ammunition fired from the 20” Colt barrel was 2848 FPS with a standard deviation of 10 FPS and a coefficient of variation of 0.35%

For those of you who might not be familiar with the coefficient of variation (CV), it is the standard deviation, divided by the mean (average) muzzle velocity and then multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage. It allows for the comparison of the uniformity of velocity between loads in different velocity spectrums; e.g. 77 grain loads running around 2,650 fps compared to 55 grain loads running around 3,250 fps.

For comparison (and to give you an idea of how good the CV is for this factory loaded MK262 Mod 1 ammunition) the mil-spec for M193 allows for a coefficient of variation of approximately 1.2%, while one of my best 77 grain OTM hand-loads, with a muzzle velocity of 2639 PFS and a standard deviation of 4 FPS, has a coefficient of variation of 0.15%.





stnadard_deviation_of_4_fps_01-1342455.jpg





Accuracy

The specification for the accuracy/precision portion of the lot-acceptance-testing of MK262 calls for multiple 10shot groups to be fired from machine-rested, heavy test barrels. I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the first-run MK262 Mod 1 ammunition following my usual protocol. This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the top of the free-float hand-guard. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.





colt_with_pri_handguard_in_benchrest_001-1470442.jpg





The Wind Probe.

wind_probe_2016_01_framedb-1342522.jpg





The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel. The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.




lothar_walther_barrel_21_resized-1326537.jpg





lothar_barrel_crown_02_resized-1297385-1342445.jpg





lothar_walther_barrel_free_floated_05-12-1342446.jpg





Prior to firing the MK262 ammunition, I fired a 10-shot control group using match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 77 grain MatchKing. That group had an extreme spread of 0.69”.




lothar_walther_control_load_01_measured-1342444.jpg





Three 10-shot groups of the MK262 Mod 1 were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads (from smallest to largest):

0.96”

1.12”

1.21”


for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 1.10”. The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group. The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.33”.



The smallest 10-shot group.


black_hills_mk262_mod_1_best_group_02-1342440.jpg





The 30-shot composite group.

mk262_composite_group_02-1342450.jpg







molon_signature_005-1357735.jpg




….
 
Last edited:
I want to have your babies, but I’m a dude.

Does that make me weird?

(LOVE your test reports!) :giggle:
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sinister
Do we even know if it’s still in common use? I know that many units replaced it and the Mk12 is no longer supported.
 
Whether or not it is in common use anymore... that is very consistent precision from a 5.56 77gr load.
Thank You for sharing your results !
 
Last edited:
Molon, your posts are always so well done. Off to buy some mk262 mod 1...
 
Indeed!
tealc_bald035-1737621.gif



The only 5.56 factory load that I've ever tested that shot more precisely than MK262, was the Barnes Precision 85 grain OTM.



barnes_box_01b_resized-1752536.jpg




85_barnes_vs_55_fmj_03_resized-1752535.jpg




barnes_factory_85_matchburner_10_shot_gr-1752538.jpg



...

Molon,

Do you recall the speeds you saw out of that 20”?

Thanks.

Edit - never mind. I found it over on m4c.
 
Last edited:
Indeed!
tealc_bald035-1737621.gif



The only 5.56 factory load that I've ever tested that shot more precisely than MK262, was the Barnes Precision 85 grain OTM.



barnes_box_01b_resized-1752536.jpg




85_barnes_vs_55_fmj_03_resized-1752535.jpg




barnes_factory_85_matchburner_10_shot_gr-1752538.jpg



...

I remember that review... as soon as I saw the Barnes 85gr on sale, I ordered a decent stash.

I ( we ) appreciate all your time and wisdom.

Thanks for educating us "Gunny" folk.

Happy New Year !!
 
Indeed!
tealc_bald035-1737621.gif



The only 5.56 factory load that I've ever tested that shot more precisely than MK262, was the Barnes Precision 85 grain OTM.



...
@Molon:
Happened upon this excellent post. Have you (or anyone) measured CBTO of the MK262? I searched internet and only saw people's own (cloned) spec. Wondering what is the true ogive that Black Hill makes them.
 
@Molon:
Have you (or anyone) measured CBTO of the MK262? I searched internet and only saw people's own (cloned) spec. Wondering what is the true ogive that Black Hill makes them.

Most of the comparators on the market don’t give you a true base to ogive measurement. As an example, the base to ogive measurement for a round of MK262 Mod 1 when using a Forster Datum Dial is 1.865”. However, that same round of MK262 has a base to ogive measurement of 1.822” when using an S.A.C comparator.

Using a digital drop indicator with a 0.219” bushing, that same round of MK262 has a base to ogive measurement of 1.817”.

....