Re: Braking effect of a suppressor
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RollingThunder51</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Mr.
What are you doing? You have a lot to learn. Start searching the past threads. Finland? Reflex? Steel vs Titanium? OAL? Can "mass" as a brake? Ridiculous....
Get reading... </div></div>
Well, I thought I was.....reading that is....
The problem is, there are so many conflicting reports! Even here where shooters are actually using suppressors in real life situations. Why Finland? Because I've been there (actually right in the city of Joensuu where the Reflex Suppressor is made). Finland has a reputation for "good stuff" when guns are the question. Hence, Lapua - Finnish, Sako(TRG)- Finnish, Vihtavuori powder - Finnish, ect. You see my point? The real purpose of getting a suppressor for me is, I want to shoot a .338 (Lapua of course) without losing any more of my hearing and also be able to shoot a lot without experiencing pain (well, the wallet might hurt a bunch but it's not the same). Why a .338? Elk & moose of course! Why titanium? Because it's lighter and I have to carry the dang thing up and down mountains, big mountains! Mass? I don't know. Somebody else on this forum said it makes a difference. Do I still have a lot to learn? Oh yeah! That's why I'm here.
Reading? More of it! You make an excellent point with that one. It makes a difference <span style="font-style: italic">what</span> one reads <span style="font-style: italic">where</span> though (another reason why I'm <span style="font-weight: bold">now</span> on this forum).