Bullet control bill

[memyselfi]

Dems Introduce Bullet Control Bill. Issued: 2018-03-27. U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is introducing legislation to require background checks for purchasers of ammunition. U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is introducing legislation to require background checks for purchasers of ammunition.

 

[Nik H]

Will go nowhere at the Federal level.

It is all for show

 

[pmclaine]

Why isnt Washerwoman Shultz, "I see nothing, I see Nothing!" under indictment for letting the Awan brothers infiltrate congress for the Pakistani secret police?

Have that bitch get her own house in order.

Paging Jeff Sessions, Paging Jefff Sessions - another investigation you could be doing in Aisle 5.

 

[memyselfi]

Will go nowhere at the Federal level.

It is all for show

May not go FED, but more states will follow as a good idea, Cali and Illinois already have. They keep throwing shit at the walls waiting to see what sticks.

 

[_Windrider_]

May not go FED, but more states will follow as a good idea, Cali and Illinois already have. They keep throwing shit at the walls waiting to see what sticks.

Well whether we like it or not, thats kind of what states rights are all about. Like we always say, you cant support one right and not the other. Yes its absolutely stupid, but it is their right to do so, its up to the people to stop it.

 

[...]

Well whether we like it or not, thats kind of what states rights are all about. Like we always say, you cant support one right and not the other. Yes its absolutely stupid, but it is their right to do so, its up to the people to stop it.

"states rights" cannot infringe on civil rights protected by the constitution.

 

[pmclaine]

Yes laboratories of Democracy under 10th Amendment powers but they cant pre-empt the COTUS......

unless.....

We have a Supreme Court that legislates from the bench or is willing to do nothing when a circuit court replies to one of their rulings with "tough shit" both of which are likely to happen.

which leaves us with "an unjust law is not a law".

 

[pmclaine]

"states rights" cannot infringe on civil rights protected by the constitution.

The Constitution protects nothing.

It merely acknowledges facts of nature and limits government in its governance.

 

[sirhrmechanic]

Is that twat still around? I thought that the Clintons had offed her. They must be slipping... Cheers, Sirhr