Rifle Scopes Bushnell 4200 vs millet 4-16

[whiteLiftedz71]

Can anyone compare these together?

I realize the Bushy is FFP, but that isnt a concern.

Looking for overall comparison of Turrets, Glass (not a big deal), tracking true, ect

 

[cuffm4615]

Re: Bushnell 4200 vs millet 4-16

Glass quality the edge goes to Bushnell , tracking is a wash some complain of Millets parralex knob being to tight but I think its fine (my buddy has four Millets), the Knock on Bushnell is there internal MOA travel (I believe around 48 MOA for the 6-24x50). My choice would be the Millet especially for long range since they offer so much more internal adjustments ( around 110MOA) and a great price for the features you get. If choosing Bushnell I would probably consider saving up a little more and moving up to an IOR, Nightforce or Leupold (though not very popular in this site)

 

[whiteLiftedz71]

Re: Bushnell 4200 vs millet 4-16

I already have a nice collection of NF and S&B's this is going on my .22....the F1 I have on it is needed for a ar10.

Will just be used for plinking although I wouldnt mind using it for hunting on my .308 either.

 

[cuffm4615]

Re: Bushnell 4200 vs millet 4-16

For a .22 I would go bushnell then. Btw I forgot to mention the Millet is a pretty big scope! It will probably look funny on most .22's

 

[whiteLiftedz71]

Re: Bushnell 4200 vs millet 4-16

It can look funny just looking for function.

Long as the Bushnell isnt head an heels about the Millet Ill go millet.

Mil/mil, 3-12, 4-16, Repeatable, Good click feel, glass

Really all I can about....hell clicks can be mushy and glass poor honestly long as its
repeatable and mil/mil