Rifle Scopes Bushnell ERS vs LRHS

[Kevins750]

If the ERS is LNIB 34mm ZS 10mil per rev vs a new LRHS at the same price point which one you choosing.

Going on a 24" .308 bolt shooting a 175gr. matchburner as far as it can on steel.

 

[supercorndogs]

The zero stop on the ERS is little more complicated and if you do it wrong sometimes it will bind the turret up and have to go in for repair. The ERS has more elevation adjustment. I like the turrets better on the LRHS, unless I am going to dial wind. The spacing is tighter on the ERS and the elevation turret is much taller.

 

[Kevins750]

I kinda understand the ERS is older tech than the LRHS/T . a zero stop for me isn't top priority, just stating
That the ERS was one of the later ones. How about the glass are they equal?

 

[patriot07]

Glass on the ERS is going to be better from the one ERS and couple of LRHS models that I've looked through.

 

[supercorndogs]

Pretty much equal/ possibly the same IMO. I have seen some pretty good and some mediocre in the glass department comparatively through a couple handfuls of both. That goes for the LRHS/LRTS and the ERS. They would all rank pretty good for the low prices they bring today.

 

[Glassaholic]

OP, the LRHS/LRTS was a superb design by LOW offering outstanding IQ for the package. The LRHS is a "lighter" scope not sure if that is of importance to you but it is also a longer scope. The ERS is a "short" design which works well on gas guns, but if you don't mind the length of the LRHS on your bolt gun I do think it offers slightly better optical performance vs. the ERS but that may be debated. I've had the DMR and DMR II and also the LRTS and LRHS - I still have the LRHS because I love the G2H reticle and the circle of death and at under $800 street price on these I just don't see any other scope competing optically.