• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

valentin_84

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 28, 2008
97
0
39
Arizona
Hey guys,

I have a Remington 700 XCR in 308 and I want to install a MAG-XTENDER which extends the standard 4 round capacity to 7 rounds of .308 for little money. I also want to install a muzzle break, but I need to know if these modifications are California legal.

I may be moving to California in 6 months so I don't want to buy anything I won't be able to use soon, but I do want to maximize my rifle's ability.

Thanks for the help!
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

If it fires a bullet its probably illeagal in Cali...If its not the sound the shot makes, its the lead in the bullet that will kill the condors (even though its not the same lead -- but heck who's counting) I moved out of that State. I would suggest that you get a hold of a FFL in California and ask him these questions ... there are nutty rules around what you can and can not do. Its worse then the Tax rules the IRS runs.

Im not bitter ... really I am not ....
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

Should be fine making most any modifications to a bolt rifle.

Almost all the goofy laws are written around semi auto rifles (aka - evil black rifles).
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

The Ca assault weapon ban laws dont apply to boltguns, you can mod it all you want, just dont put a muffler on it
frown.gif
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

Go to Calguns.net for the brass tacks.

Since it is a bolt gun the CA AWB does not apply. Make sure your muzzle brake meets CA's definition of a MB and not a flash hider. As long as your magazine does not hold more than 10 rounds it does not meet CA's definition of a "Hi cap magazine".

There is a wealth of good info and good people on calguns.net on what you can and cannot do in the Peoples Republic of Oh Shit We're Broke because we're socialists.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gme</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Ca assault weapon ban laws dont apply to boltguns, you can mod it all you want, just dont put a muffler on it
frown.gif
</div></div>

With exception on 50BMG caliber - banned even for bolt guns
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Training Wheels</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Go to Calguns.net for the brass tacks.

Since it is a bolt gun the CA AWB does not apply. Make sure your muzzle brake meets CA's definition of a MB and not a flash hider. As long as your magazine does not hold more than 10 rounds it does not meet CA's definition of a "Hi cap magazine".

There is a wealth of good info and good people on calguns.net on what you can and cannot do in the Peoples Republic of Oh Shit We're Broke because we're socialists. </div></div>

flash hiders are not restricted on bolt action rifles.

to answer the op's question, nothing you mentioned would be illegal in california.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300sniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Training Wheels said:
To answer the op's question, nothing you mentioned would be illegal in California. </div></div>

Sweeeeeeeeet!

Do you guys have any good recommendations on a great flash hider / muzzle break for my XCR?
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shooter65</div><div class="ubbcode-body">10 round mag is the max for any rifle / pistol.

Try a Vais, Fat or Little Bastard.

http://www.americanprecisionarms.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=5&page=2 </div></div>

I really like that Fat Bastard! Would I have to get the barrel threaded for those? Do they make any that basically clamp on to the barrel?
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

I see some mis-information in here.

California does not prohibit flashhiders, detachable mags, or pistol grips on bolt action rifles.

The law is against SEMI AUTO, centerfire rifles.

You can OWN more than 10rd mags in CA as long as they cannot prove that you PURCHASED them after the (1999 ?) ban.

You can trick out a bolt action rifle with anything you want as long as its not a sounds supressor. This is also a federal law anyways.

As someone else said previously, calguns. net is the single best source for all things Cali firearms related.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To be SURE, you should call the Ca. DOJ/firearms unit.
They are good folks to deal with and will ans. your questions.
Respectfully,
LG </div></div>

I respectfully disagree with this.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: super-tac</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To be SURE, you should call the Ca. DOJ/firearms unit.
They are good folks to deal with and will ans. your questions.
Respectfully,
LG </div></div>

I respectfully disagree with this. </div></div>

Why?
LG
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

lg, respectfully, I can think of at least one reason that calling DOJ might not be the good idea you think it is: Sometimes, if you call them twice, each time getting a different person, and ask the two different people the same question, you will get two entirely different answers. And, they often do not want to put their answers in writing.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: super-tac</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">To be SURE, you should call the Ca. DOJ/firearms unit.
They are good folks to deal with and will ans. your questions.
Respectfully,
LG </div></div>

I respectfully disagree with this. </div></div>

Why?
LG </div></div>

what they tell you verbally over the phone may or may not be what is enforced in the field.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: yej0001</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: gme</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Ca assault weapon ban laws dont apply to boltguns, you can mod it all you want, just dont put a muffler on it
frown.gif
</div></div>

With exception on 50BMG caliber - banned even for bolt guns </div></div>

Except the belt fed M2
grin.gif
That's legal because it's not shoulder fired.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok you 2 X-perts....
smirk.gif

Tell me when this has happened to YOU with Ca. DOJ
I have been dealing with them for over 40 yrs.
Cheers,
LG </div></div>

so you would feel comfortable making a decision that has the potential to land you in prison based solely on what the person answering the phone at the doj said (or what you interpreted him to say)? not me and i wouldn't feel comfortable recommend anyone else doing it either.

edit to add: nor would i recommend someone taking legal advice as gospel that they got from some stranger on the internet.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok you 2 X-perts....
smirk.gif

Tell me when this has happened to YOU with Ca. DOJ
I have been dealing with them for over 40 yrs.
Cheers,
LG </div></div>

Please go read some articles on the webpage above. I was part of somethhing that happened involving them when the OLLs started to be shipped into CA.

CADOJ, especially a certain agent who shoots innocent office desks, were anything but helpful.

Im not going into any details on this. Suffice it to say that I will never trust anything out of CA DOJ unless its in writing.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300sniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok you 2 X-perts....
smirk.gif

Tell me when this has happened to YOU with Ca. DOJ
I have been dealing with them for over 40 yrs.
Cheers,
LG </div></div>

so you would feel comfortable making a decision that has the potential to land you in prison based solely on what the person answering the phone at the doj said (or what you interpreted him to say)? not me and i wouldn't feel comfortable recommend anyone else doing it either.

edit to add: nor would i recommend someone taking legal advice as gospel that they got from some stranger on the internet. </div></div>

This.

Don't take my word on any laws. I know im correct, but you don't. Kinda like all guns are always loaded. Don't take my word for it, chck it out yourself. The webpage above has actual CADOJ letters, laws, and actual court cases to go by. Do yourself a favor and read up a little over there.

Btw, what part of CA are you moving to?
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

Ca. DOJ will tell you what section of the law to ref. to when you have a teck/legal issue and then as an ADULT you make YOUR CHOICE.
cool.gif

BTW, when was the last time you "experts" called Ca. DOJ?
Also, when you talk to a Ca. DOJ rep you are given his first name.
Cheers,
LG
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ca. DOJ will tell you what section of the law to ref. to when you have a teck/legal issue and then as an ADULT you make YOUR CHOICE.
cool.gif

BTW, when was the last time you "experts" called Ca. DOJ?
Also, when you talk to a Ca. DOJ rep you are given his first name.
Cheers,
LG </div></div>

Good references to vague laws don't help much.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: lumpy grits</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You have not done one thing to help the OP with his question.
wink.gif

Other than throw a bunch of MUD
smirk.gif

Respectfully,
LG </div></div>


Read my first post. It says that he can do just about any mods to a bolt action rifle, I go on to explain that the laws against flash hider, detach mag and such are only banned on semi automatic weapons.

Further, I mention real world dealing with the CA DOJ that were harmful to peoples lives and property. If you are willing to put your trust in a phone call to them, that's fine. Don't come in here telling me that im slinging mud for warning someone not to trust the CA DOJ without everything in writing.

Apparently either your reading comprehension is failing or you don't really care enough to listen.

/OUT
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

RIFLE02.jpg

Rifle is a Barrett 82A1R in 416 Barrett. The R indicates it is a California legal version. It has a 10 round detachable magazine.


You can acquire most anything that you can in other states, expect for suppressors and full autos. You just have to be aware of the laws which you can find on the Department of Justice (DOJ) website. This is a firearm I bought approximately a year ago. The only difference is that in California it had to have a bullet button, which is a mag release that you need a tool for. All my bolt guns are running 10 round detachable mags and muzzle brakes. The only thing on a bolt gun is in California you can't have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds unless its a preband receiver. I live in a lame state with some lame people but I can almost guarantee you that our weather is better, LOL!
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

Ya we can do all of that in AZ but instead of the Beach we have the river... but we can use Suppressors .... and carry our guns ....


smile.gif
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?




<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bwo6.5</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You can acquire most anything that you can in other states, expect for suppressors and full autos. You just have to be aware of the laws which you can find on the Department of Justice (DOJ) website. This is a firearm I bought approximately a year ago. The only difference is that in California it had to have a bullet button, which is a mag release that you need a tool for. All my bolt guns are running 10 round detachable mags and muzzle brakes. <span style="font-weight: bold">The only thing on a bolt gun is in California you can't have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds unless its a preband receiver</span>. I live in a lame state with some lame people but I can almost guarantee you that our weather is better, LOL! </div></div>

The mag limit has nothing to do with the reciever. <span style="font-style: italic">Any</span> mag over 10 rounds owned prior to Dec of 1999 is legal to own and use on any bolt action rifle. SB 23 (the assualt weapon bill) deals with <span style="font-weight: bold">semi auto</span> rifles and shotguns. Kalifornia also does not recognize the federal pre and post ban rules. It follows its own laws in regards to assualt weapons and magazines. As far as calling the DOJ, do so at your own peril. There have been instances of mis information spread in regards to AR type recievers and other assualt weapons. It actually took legal action to have the "memos" written by certain DOJ employees to be removed from their website. These "memos" were being referrenced as actual law in regards to certain weapons/configurations.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RobG</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

........
...As far as calling the DOJ, do so at your own peril. There have been instances of mis information spread in regards to AR type recievers and other assualt weapons. It actually took legal action to have the "memos" written by certain DOJ employees to be removed from their website. These "memos" were being referrenced as actual law in regards to certain weapons/configurations. </div></div>

This is exactly what I was saying earlier in the thread.
smile.gif
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300sniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

flash hiders are not restricted on bolt action rifles.
</div></div>

Unless its on a subsonic rifle... If you were to put a flash hider or a brake on say a 300 Whisper or any other rifle that is subsonic it could be considered a suppressor. So I've been told
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VjjR</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 300sniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

flash hiders are not restricted on bolt action rifles.
</div></div>

Unless its on a subsonic rifle... If you were to put a flash hider or a brake on say a 300 Whisper or any other rifle that is subsonic it could be considered a suppressor. So I've been told </div></div>

i'd really like to know where you heard that. i'm not believing it for a second.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

A machinist in central California told me. I'm not sure I believe it either. But I can see how some wackos would try to use it against you if you were to have one and got in trouble with the law and the rifle was related to the incident somehow.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

The only whacky CA law directly applied to a centerfire bolt rifle is the 10-round magazine limit. You cannot posses a silencer.

Concerning "subsonic" rifles (there is no PC definition what this is, therefore it doesn't exist)... It is clearly not a device or attachment.


12500. The term "silencer" as used in this chapter means any device or attachment of any kind designed, used, or intended for use in silencing, diminishing, or muffling the report of a firearm. The term "silencer" also includes any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for use in assembling a silencer or fabricating a silencer and any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.

12520. Any person, firm, or corporation who within this state
possesses a silencer is guilty of a felony and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison or by a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or by both.

12501. Section 12520 shall not apply to, or affect, any of the
following:
(a) The sale to, purchase by, or possession of silencers by
agencies listed in Section 830.1, or the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States for use in the discharge of their official duties.
(b) The possession of silencers by regular, salaried, full-time peace officers who are employed by an agency listed in Section 830.1, or by the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States when on duty and when the use of silencers is authorized by the agency and is within the course and scope of their duties.
(c) The manufacture, possession, transportation, or sale or other transfer of silencers to an entity described in subdivision (a) by dealers or manufacturers registered under Chapter 53 (commencing with Section 5801) of Title 26 of the United States Code, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LongRangeDDS</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The only whacky CA law directly applied to a centerfire bolt rifle is the 10-round magazine limit. You cannot posses a silencer.

Concerning "subsonic" rifles (there is no PC definition what this is, therefore it doesn't exist)... It is clearly not a device or attachment.


12500. The term "silencer" as used in this chapter means any device or attachment of any kind designed, used, or intended for use in silencing, diminishing, or muffling the report of a firearm. The term "silencer" also includes any combination of parts, designed or redesigned, and intended for use in assembling a silencer or fabricating a silencer and any part intended only for use in such assembly or fabrication.

12520. Any person, firm, or corporation who within this state
possesses a silencer is guilty of a felony and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison or by a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or by both.

12501. Section 12520 shall not apply to, or affect, any of the
following:
(a) The sale to, purchase by, or possession of silencers by
agencies listed in Section 830.1, or the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States for use in the discharge of their official duties.
(b) The possession of silencers by regular, salaried, full-time peace officers who are employed by an agency listed in Section 830.1, or by the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States when on duty and when the use of silencers is authorized by the agency and is within the course and scope of their duties.
(c) The manufacture, possession, transportation, or sale or other transfer of silencers to an entity described in subdivision (a) by dealers or manufacturers registered under Chapter 53 (commencing with Section 5801) of Title 26 of the United States Code, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto.

</div></div>

The point that a rifle is subsonic has nothing to do with the law. there is no law stating you cant have a brake on a subsonic cartridge chambered rifle however a brake is a "device or attachment of any kind designed" and on a subsonic cartridge rifle that Does exist, will effect the report of a rifle. If the rifle were to be tested and there is no crack of the bullet going downrange it could be considered a silencer. Someone is not going to pick on a specific rifle because it is a subsonic caliber, most non gun people don't know which rounds are subsonic but if it came down to it a brake or flash hider is still a device on the end of a barrel. If the rifles round travels slower than the speed of sound it will be quieter than another rifle right next to it that the projectile goes faster than the speed of sound. now what if for this testing reason only the rifle with the subsonic round had a brake on it, less gun intelligent people will automatically assume its a silencer. Thats all I'm stating. This was not intended to be an argument, simply a warning to anybody, that for some reason, has a brake or flash hider on a rifle with a projectiles that are subsonic. As for the definition, when I said subsonic rifle I was referring to the bullets velocity not the rifles velocity. I'm not saying its illegal to have a muzzle device on a rifle with a subsonic round, I know nothing about law, I'm just passing the word from one gun owner to the next that it could be considered a "silencer." I doubt it would ever really be an issue but there is always a chance. And who here really has a brake or hider on a subsonic round rifle anyways? especially in a state where a suppressor is illegal. Not many if any at all. If you don't like this suggestion of not having a brake on a subsonic cartridge chambered rifle then don't listen just move on. Don't try to prove me wrong because I don't really care. Again it was just a warning to me and all I'm doing is passing it on to other gun owners to keep in the back of their mind. take it or leave it.

Thanks,
Vic
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

I'd love to agree with another Bay Area person, but Vic, your last post was completely ridiculous.

A flash hider, according to the law, is not and cannot be considered a silencer unless it lessens the sound. Please don't spread false rumors so people can keep them on their mind just because someone else did it to you.

No disrespect intended, stay strong on the 2A front lines out there in the PRK.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: super-tac</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I'd love to agree with another Bay Area person, but Vic, your last post was completely ridiculous.

A flash hider, according to the law, is not and cannot be considered a silencer unless it lessens the sound. Please don't spread false rumors so people can keep them on their mind just because someone else did it to you.

No disrespect intended, stay strong on the 2A front lines out there in the PRK. </div></div>

Not completely... only slightly ridiculous. If for some unknown reason you were down range in front of the muzzle when the rifle was fired and that subsonic round was coming towards you you would say otherwise. A brake or a flash hider will disperse the report of a rifle in an opposite direction of bullet travel. (A brake more so than a hider) And you wouldn't hear the sonic crack either. In order to notice this dispersion of sound you would probably have to be at least 100 yds downrange.

But I understand
Thanks for disagreeing with me in a more polite manner than most would.

Vic
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

Breaking news, California now bans muzzle brake/compensator!

99876. "The term "muzzle brake or compensator" as used in this chapter means any device or attachment of any kind designed, used, or intended for use in redirecting the blast signature towards the shooter making the muzzle blast harder to detect downrange in addition to enhancing muzzle control."

The anti-gun crowd will claim "The increase in muzzle control will now allow shooters to have more muzzle control during the full auto strings of fire greatly enhancing the accuracy of said evil weapon, therefore putting even more innocent lives at risk. The redirected muzzle blast towards the shooters will hamper the ability of victims downrange to detect where the shots are being fired from, reducing their chance to find sufficient cover, etc"

I grew up my entire life in the Bay Area up until a few years ago. I'm glad I got out of the PRK despite not having seen my immediate family and friends for years.

Hopefully PRK pulls their head out of their ass, maybe than I'd want to go back home. It's still the place I call home.
 
Re: Cali Legal R-700 XCR 308?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tt350z</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
The anti-gun crowd will claim "The increase in muzzle control will now allow shooters to have more muzzle control during the full auto strings of fire greatly enhancing the accuracy of said evil weapon, therefore putting even more innocent lives at risk. The redirected muzzle blast towards the shooters will hamper the ability of victims downrange to detect where the shots are being fired from, reducing their chance to find sufficient cover, etc"

</div></div>

Great... I probably should delete my posts so i don't give the anti-gun crowd any bad ideas on making muzzle brakes illegal.