I've read the article on stress free pillar bedding on 6mmbr. Stress-Free Pillar Bedding
I have a Savage 110 that I'm going to bed in a Boyd Tacticool stock. I bought some pre-fab pillars that are rounded to match the radius of the action. But, I don't know that it's the perfect fit. I got them off Ebay. Looks like there might be slight gaps. And the article above also recommends not using pillars contoured to the action.
I was planning on snugging the pillars tight to the action with the actions screws, applying the bedding compound to the inlet, outside of the pillars and the action screw holes, which have been bored out so that the pillars drop freely into them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this would give me a "stress free" bedding job.
However, it seems as if where the pillars meet the action may be the weak point of the bedding job if the contour isn't exactly perfect.
So...
Instead of snugging the pillars to the action, could I leave a gap (half inch, maybe?), fill it with bedding compound, maybe tighten a turn or two to ensure compound is filling the gap, and then put compound in the inlet and action screw holes and bed it that way?
I'd still get the benefits of being able to torque on aluminum pillars which have been bedded stress free in the stock. And, if it works, the action would touch only perfectly matched bedding compound, rather than a possibly mismatched aluminum pillar.
Downside would be that I might not be able to keep bedding compound out of the receiver's action screw hole or might bed the exposed action screw to compound. (I'd have the action screw coated in neutral Kiwi.)
Or.... I could grind the top of the pillars flat, as the pillars are in the article above.
What say you guys? I suspect I'm overthinking this.
I have a Savage 110 that I'm going to bed in a Boyd Tacticool stock. I bought some pre-fab pillars that are rounded to match the radius of the action. But, I don't know that it's the perfect fit. I got them off Ebay. Looks like there might be slight gaps. And the article above also recommends not using pillars contoured to the action.
I was planning on snugging the pillars tight to the action with the actions screws, applying the bedding compound to the inlet, outside of the pillars and the action screw holes, which have been bored out so that the pillars drop freely into them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this would give me a "stress free" bedding job.
However, it seems as if where the pillars meet the action may be the weak point of the bedding job if the contour isn't exactly perfect.
So...
Instead of snugging the pillars to the action, could I leave a gap (half inch, maybe?), fill it with bedding compound, maybe tighten a turn or two to ensure compound is filling the gap, and then put compound in the inlet and action screw holes and bed it that way?
I'd still get the benefits of being able to torque on aluminum pillars which have been bedded stress free in the stock. And, if it works, the action would touch only perfectly matched bedding compound, rather than a possibly mismatched aluminum pillar.
Downside would be that I might not be able to keep bedding compound out of the receiver's action screw hole or might bed the exposed action screw to compound. (I'd have the action screw coated in neutral Kiwi.)
Or.... I could grind the top of the pillars flat, as the pillars are in the article above.
What say you guys? I suspect I'm overthinking this.