I've heard pros and cons. The cons is that heat build translates into heat mirage. Any option, thoughts? Stick with steel or use my proof certificate for a 6 or 6.5 Creedmore barrel
I'd use it on a caliber that's going to last longer, personally. I believe I have fewer mirage issues with my Proof CF barrel on my bolt gun than I did with steel/stainless. The surface of the barrel rarely gets too hot to hold.
I would do your Proof barrel in a bolt gun with one of the McMillian or Manners ultralight stocks and the new Pierce Engineering Titanium action in 6.5 creedmor. Cost will be high but will be great for carrying around and super accurate.
Have seen reports of tolerances being really tight in the Proof AR barrels. This can be a headache in the reliability department.
The JP barrels with the thermal dissipator work really well. Only heat source will be the gas tube.
I would do your Proof barrel in a bolt gun with one of the McMillian or Manners ultralight stocks and the new Pierce Engineering Titanium action in 6.5 creedmor. Cost will be high but will be great for carrying around and super accurate.
Have seen reports of tolerances being really tight in the Proof AR barrels. This can be a headache in the reliability department.
The JP barrels with the thermal dissipator work really well. Only heat source will be the gas tube.
I used a christensen carbon barrel. I think if its primarily for prs, go with a heavier barrel. If its going to be used all around, its tough to beat that carbon barrel in an ar. The weight savings is pretty sweet for packing, or shooting off hand.