• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Night Vision Clip on NVD considerations?

Mongoose0311

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 20, 2018
85
172
Tampa, Florida
Recently picked up a PVS-22 for some night time hog slaying. Outside of PVS-24's mounted on my M16 in an OP I have no real experience with clip on units and am more than capable of admitting when I'm ignorant on a subject. Thus, leading me here to learn about any considerations of shooting with a clip on device I may be overlooking.

I already have an UNS mount, so the rifle is ready to rock.
 
Get yourself a good illuminator. A Luna or spir would be good choices of you don't have a pvs-14 headmounted. I'd say look into a dbal d2 or mawl if you do. The it laser is invaluable for snap shots.
 
If you don’t have the side rails for auxiliary stuff there’s all kinds of stuff to mount to a scope or scope rings.
Badger makes a nice scope ring set up with a rail. Similar to Nightforce RAP.
I put a quick detach on my illum.
Having it closer to reach on the scope is nice if it’s adjustable.
I usually turn down the gain to where you barely see before turning on illuminators.


C8E36E4B-4DDA-46B4-B2FD-CA8F0BED5D5D.jpeg
52976AA4-54A8-4D88-A29A-E14CDCC764A9.jpeg
 
That they are.
Then one fix would be to put one of these on your rig. https://www.nightforceoptics.com/riflescopes/accessories/top-half-ring-accessories

From your pic, looks like you have a trusty old NXS on the gun. If so, that would be a 30mm main tube and you would use part #A428.
SportOptics has them in stock for a smidge over a hundred bucks. https://www.sportoptics.com/nightforce-accessory-platform-a428.aspx


Looks like this when in play.
A decent IR Illuminator will supercharge your PVS22.

20171125_132711.jpg



./
 
Inside 500yds or so I don't mind a led based illuminator like a torch. The armasight 850? Is also very good if you can find one. Focusable, more power than a torch and has 3-4 power levels. It's so much smoother and easier to look at than laser.
At longer range, especially over flat ground, a jailbroken Luna is the ticket. Even focused down the LEDs give some spill in the foreground.
 
Then one fix would be to put one of these on your rig. https://www.nightforceoptics.com/riflescopes/accessories/top-half-ring-accessories

From your pic, looks like you have a trusty old NXS on the gun. If so, that would be a 30mm main tube and you would use part #A428.
SportOptics has them in stock for a smidge over a hundred bucks. https://www.sportoptics.com/nightforce-accessory-platform-a428.aspx


Looks like this when in play.
A decent IR Illuminator will supercharge your PVS22.

View attachment 7329667


./

pants...getting...stiff
 
First picture is 530Yds.

Second is 620yds.

It looks a little better in person than it does with my phone. Does anybody have comparative pictures? Granted my only experience is 24's in front of an RCO, but i was expecting a little better clarity. This exact platform (XM-3) was designed to be able to shoot 1k day and night, and I'm honestly not sure how seeing as 630ishyds is starting to get to the point I couldn't even ID what's a target and what's not.
 

Attachments

  • 20200522_211237.jpg
    20200522_211237.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 75
  • 20200522_214409.jpg
    20200522_214409.jpg
    918.9 KB · Views: 77
Reason I asked is because your images sorta looked like too much X on the scope. Don't be afraid to try with slightly lower X. Resulting image is easier on the eyes and makes your brain more happy with what it is trying to process.

Just a thought.... Try the same settings but get a target area that doesn't have bright ass light sources in the FOV. The whole "photonic barrier" thing includes getting image degradation due to strong light sources in the same field of view that you are trying to utilize your NV in. Some areas with a lot of ambient artificial light can actually be defined and targeted better with no NV at all and trying to force the use of the NV will actually hurt your ability to perform.

Parallax always goes to infinity regardless of the scope/clip-on combination.

./
 
  • Like
Reactions: deersniper
I've tried moving the 22 forward and backwards, I've adjusted parallax and focused the 22 and I cant seem to get a crisp image I'm use to.

One other thing that MAY cause a degradation in the quality of your viewed image is the amount of mis-alignment between your day scope and the 22. From your rifle pic, it looks like you are using Low/0.885" or Med/1.00" NF rings. Your setup looks like you might have as much as 3/4" linear offset between the two which is a lot. I would always setup new guns destined for clip-on use with the 1.265" and in some cases 1.375" rings to better ensure best possible performance of the NV.

Can't remember but I think the 22s ask you to keep it plus or minus 1/4" . You may also experience an increase in any POI shift with the two being that far off center.

./
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjh30
"Does anybody have comparative pictures? "

These were in a very rural area. No white light sources anywhere close.
Horse in a catch pen. Super easy to see ears twitching and tail swatting flies. 1/8 moon and clear star night.
720'ish yards
20180922_205645.jpg

20180922_210100.jpg


Out shed with crates leaning against it. Same night and conditions. Very easy to see gaps between the boards on the pallets and all edges well defined.
534yds.
20180922_205145.jpg

20180922_204415.jpg
 
"Does anybody have comparative pictures? "

These were in a very rural area. No white light sources anywhere close.
Horse in a catch pen. Super easy to see ears twitching and tail swatting flies. 1/8 moon and clear star night.
720'ish yards
View attachment 7333688
View attachment 7333690

Out shed with crates leaning against it. Same night and conditions. Very easy to see gaps between the boards on the pallets and all edges well defined.
534yds.
View attachment 7333691
View attachment 7333693

What clip on is this Terry?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kocustoms
Reason I asked is because your images sorta looked like too much X on the scope. Don't be afraid to try with slightly lower X. Resulting image is easier on the eyes and makes your brain more happy with what it is trying to process.

Just a thought.... Try the same settings but get a target area that doesn't have bright ass light sources in the FOV. The whole "photonic barrier" thing includes getting image degradation due to strong light sources in the same field of view that you are trying to utilize your NV in. Some areas with a lot of ambient artificial light can actually be defined and targeted better with no NV at all and trying to force the use of the NV will actually hurt your ability to perform.

Parallax always goes to infinity regardless of the scope/clip-on combination.

./

Dialing back in the mag DEFINITELY helped the image quality slot. Still not as nice as some of these WP pvs30's I'm seeing, but about enough I could probably hit steel at 600 with.

I did notice an image quality difference when playing when parralax, noted, will keep it at initiate when playing with clip on.



One other thing that MAY cause a degradation in the quality of your viewed image is the amount of mis-alignment between your day scope and the 22. From your rifle pic, it looks like you are using Low/0.885" or Med/1.00" NF rings. Your setup looks like you might have as much as 3/4" linear offset between the two which is a lot. I would always setup new guns destined for clip-on use with the 1.265" and in some cases 1.375" rings to better ensure best possible performance of the NV.

Can't remember but I think the 22s ask you to keep it plus or minus 1/4" . You may also experience an increase in any POI shift with the two being that far off center.

./

I agree, it's definitely not ideal and I'm not entirely sure why the system was designed like this.

Granted it was an early GWOT rifle and we dont know now what we did there.


BTW, I think your rig is sexy AF.

./

Thanks! I'm a huge fan of the XM-3, its definitely fun having one of the only accurate clones out there. It turns alot of heads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terry Cross
Dialing back to 8x drastically improved image as well as confirming parralax set to infinite.

Tried to get out to a darker spot with no lights, but the state trooper wasn't as amused as I was....
 

Attachments

  • 20200523_200129.jpg
    20200523_200129.jpg
    533.3 KB · Views: 78
  • inCollage_20200523_221046563.jpg
    inCollage_20200523_221046563.jpg
    2.9 MB · Views: 82
  • Like
Reactions: Terry Cross
@Terry Cross would I be over reading / interpreting to understand that a WP version of each unit would tend to be roughly equal to the next objective lens size?

Example
WP=GP
PVS22=PVS30
PVS30=PVS27
 
Thanks

Just wanted to make sure my current understanding was correct, but reading that statement made me wonder if I was missing some information

Night vision is a whole other ballgame when talking about clip on units.

You can have a high FOM tube with a Lower LPM that has a STELLAR image when looking through it with your eye, but have a less quality image through glass. Remember the scope is no longer magnifying an image at distance, its magnifying the screen in front of it. This is where the LPM (Lines per millimeter) come into play. Your average pvs14-15-31, whatever can have a sub 70LPM and be great units. For a clip on, 70LPM is the lowest you want.


Here is a really good write up on night vision.

https://www.pulsar-nv.com/glo/support/night-vision-technologies/77/