Re: competitive edge gunworks remington bolts
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JJones75</div><div class="ubbcode-body">while removing alot of material from the locking lug to install that extractor and it still working fine kind of make you wonder why everybody is so adamit about the rem 700 action being to weak for the 338 lapua case!!
granted that will be mating with the bottm lug abutment which has alot less strength than the top one (on repeaters anyway) .
Looks like a very good desgine </div></div>
I guess I should note that this rifle was built with a Chromoly action and barrel. I read a thread, I think over on LRH, written by Kirby Allen specifically addressing the 338LM class of cartridges and the Remington 700. IIRC, he explained that he would not use a factory Remington SS receiver for a 338LM class cartridge. He had witnessed, first hand, lug setback with that class of cartridges in a SS Remington receiver.
I must caveat all this with the fact that I know nearly nothing about metallurgical processes, the strength of different steels, or anything gunsmithing.
What I do know is that Remington produces a 338LM from the factory and I haven't heard of a failure on one of them to date. I wanted a 338LM on a true 700 footprint without the longer tenon, larger diameter receiver body, or a different tang; but I didn't want a MLR. The donor action for this was a new chromoly 300RUM SPS. According to Larry at CEG, the bolt is 420 SS (he should know, he makes them). Midway mistakenly lists it as a 4140. It is most definitely not 4140.
Like I said,I don't have a lot of rounds on this setup. Time will tell if it will indeed hold up or not.