Corps to use more lethal ammo in Afghanistan

[ubet]

Re: Corps to use more lethal ammo in Afghanistan

I dont think any normal person is for genocide of a culture who is non violent, wants to be left alone, peaceful and lawabiding. But the islamic fucks are none of that, they want to rule the world with sharia law, we have been there for 8 years now. Something needs to change, we either need to get in or get the fuck out of there. No invading force has ever succeded in ruling Afghanistan. Like shooter65 said, we need to pull out nuke them, nuke Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia and be done with it. Take their oil and not think twice. Does one person seriously think that if one of those countries had a nuke except maybe saudi arabia that they wouldnt use it against us? If you think that you are sadly mistakin. I sincerly think we had a chance when we helped them drive out the USSR, if we would have done nation building then, we might not be in the cluster fuck we are in now, but hindsight is20/20. The difference between muslims and hitler is that hitler wasnt driven by a religous idea that he was willing to die for, he just wanted to rule the world. Those asses want to rule the world over an archaic religous belief, and are willing to die for it. NUKE EM ALL!

Eleaf it is very clear you are a left wing nut job who is anti gun, so what are you doing on this site other than being a troll?

 

[BugSniper]

Re: Corps to use more lethal ammo in Afghanistan

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 1911fan</div><div class="ubbcode-body">eleaf, I don't think you understand what we're up against. My response above ("Ask the fuckers...) was meant to answer your quoted question. And no,we can't all get along. Yes, they all need to die. No, it doesn't make us better. It makes us the winner.

Recommended reading: Guide to Islam

1911fan </div></div>

Bingo. It's not like calling a sucker shot during a fight over the virginal nature of a girlfriend. It's a war where one side wants you dead, because you don't believe as they do. You can't do anything but make that an impossible feat. Feeling good about how you got there is a luxury left for when winning does not matter. Anyone not fond of the notion of dhimmitude for themselves and all their descendants(who avoid castration) must realize that with that fate being the consecuence, losing is simply not an option. We'll feel a lot more fuzzy by how we treat any survivors than we will after losing by fighting with pillows all the way home to the House of Peace.

Bush said paraphrased You're either with us, or you're against us.
You either want to survive, or you don't. This is a fight about survival to anybody who does not want to live under Sharia. The weak will be welcomed with open shackles, so if your conscience is strained, worry not.

 

[Fritz24]

Re: Corps to use more lethal ammo in Afghanistan

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
If by "shit" you mean "killing innocent people based off of a fallacy that the extreme right would like for us all to believe (that all 2 billion Muslims worldwide are terrorists hell bent on destroying America)
</div></div>

Actually, what you have stated here is the fallacy. The so-called "extreme right" (Paleo-conservatives, nativist/nationalists, racialists, etc.)want no such thing. It is the Neo-conservative right, or movement conservatives who are so vehemently anti-Muslim, pro war and the like. Neocons are no more on the "extreme right" than some old-school, southern Democrat is on the extreme left.