Re: Counter Sniper Scopes
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Falar</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: T-Snipe</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi to all, yes I'm new but a long time re-loader and shooter.
The thing I find interesting about all these comments is that only one that I read seemed to have any hands-on experience?
In Midway's review section about the Counter Sniper scopes, the 8-32 x56mm received [4] 5-star ratings from individuals and one 2 star rating. On the 6-25 x56 there are [3] 4-star so possibly you guys just happened to get a bad scope or started with a really low end one your doing your eval with?
Also one of the guys said he would place the clarity on par with his IOR Valdana and another fellow on a different form and a former sniper said he's got two of them and they equal his Night Force and S&B, if I remember his other high-end scope.
So there seems to be a considerable amount of discrepancy from what a lot of you are saying??
Everybody has their personal preferences and not everyone can afford or cares to expend $1,500.00 plus on a scope either.
Now I've also noticed that there are two different styles of the CS scopes, the D-Ops line has the rheostat in front of the elevation turret while the C-S models that Sportsma's Guide sells has it on the side of the eye piece and they also have good reviews, indeed the sniper's review is there, and SG offers 100% satisfaction guarantee too which I can personally attest too that they honor!
Your replies are of interest.
</div></div>
Please tell me this is a troll and no one is really this stupid.
How come CS hasn't been sued into the ground yet with their obviously false claims of military use and "contract overruns"? DOD contracts are public information and anyone can easily prove in a court of law that they are full of shit.
Anyone can google "Bertrillium Zantitium" and prove that they are talking jibberish and are not referring to any existing metals or elements. </div></div>
They haven't been sued because their Corporate Status is "International" which means they have an offshore captive that they operate under. They may have a US office but they are most likely a DBA or LLC that is owned offshore. This would mean that a US judgment would be worth about the paper its written on and the money u spent getting it.
Only thing anyone could really do is have their US offices shut down but they are pretty much a mail order company and most orders either ship from overseas or are initiated from overseas so that will only slow them down a little.
Additionally, their claims of Patented Gases are true. They can patent anything they want it doesn't mean it does a damn thing. Kind of like the Thigh Master. It was patented and "Meant to be used" for your thighs when in all reality all its good for is taking up shelf space on my wife's side in my damn bedroom closet. It's a marketing ploy and many many stupid people fall for it...
They can mark Government on anything they want as long as they don't "Quote" as that would be a lie... Kind of like your kids toys that say Gamma Death Ray in big letters on the side...
However, these threads do give us an opportunity to read lots of big, blue letters 
