I was just reading how the SCOTUS refused to hear a case to allow non violent felons to exercise their rights to own firearms.
If got me to thinking, why is it all these courts need to hear cases and all this time and expense has to occur to REMOVE a law, but a simple flick of a incompetent statists pen MAKES a law.
Shouldn’t MAKING laws require the same level of checks and balances and hearings and BS?
I mean what’s the rush to make a new law? Country has been running for hundreds and hundreds of years without your draconian brainchild of a idea, what’s a few more years to make sure it passes muster with the constitution, and no one can make a valid reason NOT to pass it?
It’s almost like the entire legal system is designed to be used on, not for, Main Street
If got me to thinking, why is it all these courts need to hear cases and all this time and expense has to occur to REMOVE a law, but a simple flick of a incompetent statists pen MAKES a law.
Shouldn’t MAKING laws require the same level of checks and balances and hearings and BS?
I mean what’s the rush to make a new law? Country has been running for hundreds and hundreds of years without your draconian brainchild of a idea, what’s a few more years to make sure it passes muster with the constitution, and no one can make a valid reason NOT to pass it?
It’s almost like the entire legal system is designed to be used on, not for, Main Street
