Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A D-Day was the bigest british project ,even tough Ike was in charge. Most of the heavy lifting was by the British. Nowdays Brits are not even a shadow of former Empire.
Of 1,213 warships involved, 892 were British/Canadian,200 US. Of 4,126 landing craft involved, 805 American, 3,261 British.
Two-thirds of the 12,000 aircraft involved in D-Day were RAF/RCAF. Two-thirds of the troops landed on the beaches were British/Canadian. Eisenhower was supreme commander but all his most senior officers in charge of land, sea and air were British.
Well this is awkward...
![]()
Lists of ships planes and units partaking in D-Day is published numerous times on the net. .Sources for your claims?
And even if true, the US took on and defeated the empire of Japan virtually singlehandedly over a theatre of war orders of magnitude more vast and remote than anything the British undertook in all of the 20th century.
Germans definetly took part in D day , just not as the allied nation.
But you can forgive the Brits ,country is barely holding together (Scotts might walk away after Brexit),muslems and russian mafiosi run London ,goverment is bussy outlawing plastic knives and forks ,while royals play the role of Kardashians ,only thing still working is proaganda machine.
A D-Day was the bigest british project ,even tough Ike was in charge. Most of the heavy lifting was by the British. Nowdays Brits are not even a shadow of former Empire.
Of 1,213 warships involved, 892 were British/Canadian,200 US. Of 4,126 landing craft involved, 805 American, 3,261 British.
Two-thirds of the 12,000 aircraft involved in D-Day were RAF/RCAF. Two-thirds of the troops landed on the beaches were British/Canadian. Eisenhower was supreme commander but all his most senior officers in charge of land, sea and air were British.
Lists of ships planes and units partaking in D-Day is published numerous times on the net. .
Honestly Japs were no where near WW2 Germany , huge in terms of distances and logistics needed for the naval and air war but minor league in land war . Tech they used till end of the war would be obsolete in Europe after 1941 at the latest. Once V-E day was over, the short Soviet war with japan demonstrated japs were no match for Allied armies of 1945 ,90 soviet divisions went trough Japs in land combat like lighting
No source necessary. We all know they were trying to compensate for Montgomery representing them.Sources for your claims?
And even if true, the US took on and defeated the empire of Japan virtually singlehandedly over a theatre of war orders of magnitude more vast and remote than anything the British undertook in all of the 20th century.
Today you think of history as you see in the movies and fairy tales made post war.The number of units, in and of itself, means nothing. Number the manpower involved from each country and then we can talk.
As far as the Japanese go, only an idiot dismisses them that easily. Their naval sophistication overshadowed Germany's tenfold and what their land armies may have lacked in technical sophistication they more than made up in savagery, tactics, and pure balls.
Indeed ,likely would. US manufacturing definetly helped a great deal all allies. Leand lease provided for much of Soviet transport needs and lets not forget the deadliest allied pilots flew Bell Airacobras in the east , inferior plane for high altitude fight in the West but great in low altitude combat on the Eastern front.If the US didn't send millions of tons of materials ect to the Isles they would have fell.
They had gotten their asses kicked right along with the French and others.
Hilter, luckily, started up Barbarossa and split his forces along two fronts.
R