I'm gonna ask a question and please excuse my ignorance but I read the article about what Marty Daniels said referring to the nics act and what is wrong with what he is saying? Help me out here.
I'm gonna ask a question and please excuse my ignorance but I read the article about what Marty Daniels said referring to the nics act and what is wrong with what he is saying? Help me out here.
Here is my take on it after reading portions of the actual act. It is not increasing any mental health issues that prohibit the owning of a firearm. It is purely to require the reporting of situations that already illegal to own a firearm with these mental health issues. If you can legally own a firearm right now there will be no change to what you own. This bill would enact repercussions for groups that fail to update a database such as state and federal agencies at least twice a year. It also authorizes 100 million dollars for appropriations to complete these goals. There is some BS stuff about the reporting of crimes with bump stocks but merely that. Overall, I think this bill makes a lot of sense, but I do think it is BS that it may take 100 million for people to do what they already should be doing. Those are the main take ways I have found from the documentation. Here is the bill if anyone wants the exact document.