• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Darwin funded by the Jews say Lara Logan

No one reads Rolling Stone, so I don't think it will be interesting politically, or nationally. But, here? One the Hide? Yeah, this cold smoke out all sorts of flat-earthers, 911 hoaxers, holocaust deniers, 'the moon landing was staged'ers, and many other conspiracy 'theory' advocates. While the article will likely be a nothing-burger, this thread could be epic...
 
well few understand the difference between evolution and modification, including scientists
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot
iu
 
I don't know if Darwin was funded by Jews and I don't really care, but it's interesting that Sir Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) used Darwin's theory of evolution to start the eugenics movement. Other members of Darwin's family were also involved in the movement and that movement continues on today.

 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
I don't know if Darwin was funded by Jews and I don't really care, but it's interesting that Sir Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) used Darwin's theory of evolution to start the eugenics movement. Other members of Darwin's family were also involved in the movement and that movement continues on today.

Interesting? Do you remember what the subtitle of “On the Origin of Species” was?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makarios031
I don't know if Darwin was funded by Jews and I don't really care, but it's interesting that Sir Francis Galton (Darwin's cousin) used Darwin's theory of evolution to start the eugenics movement. Other members of Darwin's family were also involved in the movement and that movement continues on today.

"In the late nineteenth century, claims were being made that the “higher” classes of society - the wealthy and successful - were being outbred by the so-called unfit. "

The above seems true today. Perhaps why the 'elite' have wars that their children never fight in, only the lower classes. That thins the common herd.
 
Interesting? Do you remember what the subtitle of “On the Origin of Species” was?
"By Means Of Natural Selection" Do I get a prize?

or do you want to include:

"or the"

"Preservation of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life"
 
The favored races part would seem most relevant to the discussion. The author wanted it there, for his own reasons, which is the point. It’s always been a racist fairytale.
 
No one reads Rolling Stone, so I don't think it will be interesting politically, or nationally. But, here? One the Hide? Yeah, this cold smoke out all sorts of flat-earthers, 911 hoaxers, holocaust deniers, 'the moon landing was staged'ers, and many other conspiracy 'theory' advocates. While the article will likely be a nothing-burger, this thread could be epic...
No, it’ll only go like three posts before it turns to Covid 19 and the 2020 Election and then we’ll have to listen to 5 guys who have a BKC over .3 and 10 paid shills talk about imaginary differences between conspiracies. Alternating between how Biden, Pelosi, Hillary, and Soros are the “Deep State” actors we need to “stop” and how the state of affairs is accidental and driven by short sighted greed and a lack of intellect.
 
One things the Left and Right can always agree on:

Its the Jews fault.

This is not a repeat of every year since the beginning of time.
 
Someone sure as hell funded him. Or did he sail the world on his own dime? Someone or something usually funds all scientific research. The USA funded the moon flights and landings. Funding research does not mean the research is wrong or a hoax or anything of the sort. It is entirely possible to fund research and dislike the findings.

Did she go crazy after the Egyptians gang banged her a few years ago or what? Remember when she got caught in the "muslim uprising" and made a porno with 125 of her new best friends.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bender
Someone sure as hell funded him. Or did he sail the world on his own dime? Someone or something usually funds all scientific research. The USA funded the moon flights and landings. Funding research does not mean the research is wrong or a hoax or anything of the sort. It is entirely possible to fund research and dislike the findings.

Did she go crazy after the Egyptians gang banged her a few years ago or what? Remember when she got caught in the "muslim uprising" and made a porno with 125 of her new best friends.
But now 150 years later does it matter WHO funded him. Even if its just a "random tidbit" one would either have to be categorical stupid or naive to think there is not a subtle implication behind this "Did you know".

And then the Left uses it to slam us all as racists.
 
It’s pretty cool to see the percentage of state apologists that have strong defenses against anti-Semitic overtones.
 
Seeing a huge chunk of the financial industry, from CPAs to loan officers are Jewish, couldn’t the same be said to a degree about most financial transactions.

My CPA has tons of vowels in his last name, and that’s a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bender
They killed their King and Messiah
sigh....yeah, and the Romans had zero to do with it.

I guess the reference to Blood Libel really isn't that far off...comes right after "Jews the Christ Killer". FFS
 
sigh....yeah, and the Romans had zero to do with it.

I guess the reference to Blood Libel really isn't that far off...comes right after "Jews the Christ Killer". FFS
That’s even worse. David was rebuked for having Uriah killed by the swords of the sons of Ammon. Just like crazy things done to escape the restrictions of the Sabbath, do you honestly think the Creator of heaven and earth is confused by the false distinction? Let’s check…

Acts 2:22-24 NASB
[22] "Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know- [23] this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. [24] But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power.

Nope. Seems like our Father sees it pretty clearly.
 
That’s even worse. David was rebuked for having Uriah killed by the swords of the sons of Ammon. Just like crazy things done to escape the restrictions of the Sabbath, do you honestly think the Creator of heaven and earth is confused by the false distinction? Let’s check…

Acts 2:22-24 NASB
[22] "Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know- [23] this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. [24] But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power.

Nope. Seems like our Father sees it pretty clearly.

Legit if Jesus came back and posted here, he’d probably get banned 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Bender and PDXGS
That’s even worse. David was rebuked for having Uriah killed by the swords of the sons of Ammon. Just like crazy things done to escape the restrictions of the Sabbath, do you honestly think the Creator of heaven and earth is confused by the false distinction? Let’s check…

Acts 2:22-24 NASB
[22] "Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know- [23] this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. [24] But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power.

Nope. Seems like our Father sees it pretty clearly.
I’ll tell you what…you pretend I don’t exist and you can spew your antisemitic shit at someone else and I’ll pretend you don’t exist.
 
Ohh cupcake, do you need a hug?

Still believe in the tooth ferry too?
Fuck off fish, I still remember that you’re the douche bag asshole that was bragging that you’d never join the military and defend your country because mommy and daddy made enough money to ensure their little sweet pea Fish wouldn’t have to.

Go away and mind your own business, jerk off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yasherka
By the time this thread hits its second page, Lara Logan’s theory will likely be relegated to only the second dumbest thing written on the internet today.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: geek65 and Austan
“Does anyone know who employed Darwin, where Darwinism comes from?” Logan, now with Fox News’ streaming service Fox Nation, asked. “Look it up: The Rothschilds. It goes back to 10 Downing Street. The same people who employed Darwin, and his theory of evolution and so on and so on. I’m not saying that none of that is true. I’m just saying Darwin was hired by someone to come up with a theory — based on evidence, OK, fine.”

why is it that if somebody mentions somebody of jewish decent, this is somehow automatically applied to all people of jewish decent?
from what i can see in that article, logan didn't point her finger at "jews", she mentioned a name of one person, that happens to be jewish.

logan obviously upset people with her reality check on ukraine, so they are calling her an anti-semite to smear her reputation.
 
Yeah, just waiting to see the Blood Libel resurrected next by the antisemitics.

5dazg1.jpg
Dang, had to look that one up.

"Blood libels typically claim that Jews require human blood for the baking of matzos, an unleavened flatbread which is eaten during Passover, although this element of the accusation was allegedly absent in the earliest blood libels in which then-contemporary Jews were accused of reenacting the crucifixion. The accusations often assert that the blood of Christian children is especially coveted, and historically, blood libel claims have been made in order to account for the otherwise unexplained deaths of children."

COULD YOU JUST PRICK MY FINGER? I get woozy at the sight of blood, especially my own.
 
I’ll tell you what…you pretend I don’t exist and you can spew your antisemitic shit at someone else and I’ll pretend you don’t exist.
There is a difference in antisemitism, and looking at history.

I dont give a fuck who did what to who, when, or where, as long as we can face the truth. Heres one. when the Israelites crossed the Jordan River 'God' told them to, and they obeyed, kill every living thing. Thats brutal. How about another. The Spanish enslaved and killed 10's of thousands of native Americans in Mexico and South America. The 'Christians' ddid the same to their natives, after decimating them.

Fuck a bunch of religions. All of them. All that counts is the truth, and that we learn to treat others as we want to be treated. Until then its nothing but a big Fuck You.
 
I’m a Jew. I’m not antisemetic.
Haha. Then I have zero idea what you were saying in your previous posts. But I do apologize.

Jews for Jesus? Never mind, doesn’t matter.

Let us all go in peace and I’m getting out of this thread.

Talk about mental illness, I have zero idea why I keep dipping a toe into the Pit.

Cheers
 
“Does anyone know who employed Darwin, where Darwinism comes from?” Logan, now with Fox News’ streaming service Fox Nation, asked. “Look it up: The Rothschilds. It goes back to 10 Downing Street. The same people who employed Darwin, and his theory of evolution and so on and so on. I’m not saying that none of that is true. I’m just saying Darwin was hired by someone to come up with a theory — based on evidence, OK, fine.”

why is it that if somebody mentions somebody of jewish decent, this is somehow automatically applied to all people of jewish decent?
from what i can see in that article, logan didn't point her finger at "jews", she mentioned a name of one person, that happens to be jewish.

logan obviously upset people with her reality check on ukraine, so they are calling her an anti-semite to smear her reputation.
While depicting Jesus as a bawling baby afraid of the mob, and calling the historical fact that the Jews crucified their Messiah as an unfounded rumor. You know, actual hate.
 
“Does anyone know who employed Darwin, where Darwinism comes from?” Logan, now with Fox News’ streaming service Fox Nation, asked. “Look it up: The Rothschilds. It goes back to 10 Downing Street. The same people who employed Darwin, and his theory of evolution and so on and so on. I’m not saying that none of that is true. I’m just saying Darwin was hired by someone to come up with a theory — based on evidence, OK, fine.”

why is it that if somebody mentions somebody of jewish decent, this is somehow automatically applied to all people of jewish decent?
from what i can see in that article, logan didn't point her finger at "jews", she mentioned a name of one person, that happens to be jewish.

logan obviously upset people with her reality check on ukraine, so they are calling her an anti-semite to smear her reputation.
Same goes for sorors amd other prominent jews. Mention the evil deeds by an individual and the attacks come coupled with the cries of victomhood.
 
While depicting Jesus as a bawling baby afraid of the mob, and calling the historical fact that the Jews crucified their Messiah as an unfounded rumor. You know, actual hate.
what does that picture have to do with logan or some random rich guy?
"the jews" didn't crucify jesus, and if he wasn't crucified, he would not have risen. that is a stupid thing to be mad about anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot
Haha. Then I have zero idea what you were saying in your previous posts. But I do apologize.

Jews for Jesus? Never mind, doesn’t matter.

Let us all go in peace and I’m getting out of this thread.

Talk about mental illness, I have zero idea why I keep dipping a toe into the Pit.

Cheers
Sounds fine. No hurt feelings here. I don’t appreciate being called anti-Semitic or racist, I am neither, at all.

Jesus believing Jew.

Amen, I’ll go in peace and peace to you, too.
 
The Rothschilds are the Jews that one invokes when one wishes to “sorry, not sorry” implicate all Jews.
 
Sounds fine. No hurt feelings here. I don’t appreciate being called anti-Semitic or racist, I am neither, at all.

Jesus believing Jew.

Amen, I’ll go in peace and peace to you, too.
My friend calls him self a "Messianic Jew".