What is the difference between these two scopes besides $1400 in price? Is the Razor worth the extra money?
Rifle Scopes Difference between Vortex PST gen 2 viper ffp 5x25x50 mrad and Razor 4.5x27x56 gen 2 mrad ffp
- Thread starter Kawi
- Start date
Is it worth it to you is the question. I have them both and I enjoy them both.
The Razor is a tank and I run it in my match rifle where it takes dings, bumps and scrapes.
The Vioer stays in my Vudoo build but I would run it in matches too.
If you want the toughest you can get then Razor. If your ok with slightly less durable turrets get the Viper.
With the prices of razors going for $1700 it’s a no brainer in my opinion.
The Razor is a tank and I run it in my match rifle where it takes dings, bumps and scrapes.
The Vioer stays in my Vudoo build but I would run it in matches too.
If you want the toughest you can get then Razor. If your ok with slightly less durable turrets get the Viper.
With the prices of razors going for $1700 it’s a no brainer in my opinion.
Razor has much better glass in it. And as stated the razor is built like a tank better turrets etc
Much better glass, better light transmission, and just flat out a better scope. Built in Japan vs the Philippines if I remember correctly. Turrets are extremely beefy with hard tactile clicks. 34mm tube vs 30 and I really like the click less zero stop in the gen 2 razor although the g2 PST is similar. I wouldn't hesitate to pick up another razor used on here used if I needed a scope. They go for 1800 usually.
It's like the difference between an Indian made car that smells like Curry and an Italian sports car that smells like a supermodels snatch.
It's not even a choice.
It's not even a choice.
Similar threads
