• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Range Report Disappointing results from Hornady 6.5 CM 140 ELD Match factory ammo

ZFletcher

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Mar 24, 2021
    126
    47
    Illinois
    I have purchased 6.5 CM Hornady 140 ELD Match ammo several times this year and have been disappointed at the velocity and extreme spread I have been seeing. Hornady lists 2710 fps (24" test barrel). I have been getting 2655 avg with a recent build (24" barrel with about 150 rounds through it so far). Also, I am seeing extreme spreads of around 50 fps. About 2-3 years ago I used the 140 ELD Match factory ammo in a different rifle (26" barrel) and was getting 2750-ish with much lower extreme spreads. I thought maybe I just had a "slow barrel" on the new build but then I recently tried Berger 144 LRHT (factory ammo). Berger lists the ammo as 2830 fps (26" test barrel). I chrono'd the Berger ammo today and got 2840 fps avg, SD 8, and ES 19. Now I am even more disappointed with the Hornady ammo than I was before. Has anyone else seen inconsistencies with recently manufactured Hornady 6.5 CM ammo or is my experience the exception?
     
    I have purchased 6.5 CM Hornady 140 ELD Match ammo several times this year and have been disappointed at the velocity and extreme spread I have been seeing. Hornady lists 2710 fps (24" test barrel). I have been getting 2655 avg with a recent build (24" barrel with about 150 rounds through it so far). Also, I am seeing extreme spreads of around 50 fps. About 2-3 years ago I used the 140 ELD Match factory ammo in a different rifle (26" barrel) and was getting 2750-ish with much lower extreme spreads. I thought maybe I just had a "slow barrel" on the new build but then I recently tried Berger 144 LRHT (factory ammo). Berger lists the ammo as 2830 fps (26" test barrel). I chrono'd the Berger ammo today and got 2840 fps avg, SD 8, and ES 19. Now I am even more disappointed with the Hornady ammo than I was before. Has anyone else seen inconsistencies with recently manufactured Hornady 6.5 CM ammo or is my experience the exception?
    2800 FPS out of a proof SS 24” barrel.

    last box I shot had ES of about 30 and SD about 12.

    I’m not sure where your expectations derive from for factory ammo ES/SD.

    ES in teens and single digit SD is, in my limited experience, not realistic for factory ammo and is more in the realm of hand loads.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: DIBBS and BoilerUP
    I'm trying to remember what I got out of Spark Munitions with that 135 Bergers... but I want to say it was 30ES and 11SD. Which wasnt too bad...

    With match brass I'm seeing 22ES and 6SD... and that's pretty good, but it's not factory ammo.

    This is a bolt gun with handloads showing warm vs cool variations:


    This is a gas gun showing alot of different factory rounds:



    The numbers you're seeing are actually good.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: deersniper
    2800 FPS out of a proof SS 24” barrel.

    last box I shot had ES of about 30 and SD about 12.

    I’m not sure where your expectations derive from for factory ammo ES/SD.

    ES in teens and single digit SD is, in my limited experience, not realistic for factory ammo and is more in the realm of hand loads.

    My expectations (which were NOT of having an the ES in teens, nor of a single digit SD) were derived from having much better results with the Hornady 140 ELD Match (and 143 ELD-X) ammo a few years back with a different rifle, as well as a few friends I shoot with who were also using the same stuff in their rifles. While I wasn't expecting an ES in the teens, I also wasn't expecting an ES of 50. I was mostly surprised at the slower velocity. Regardless, I think it reasonable to be disappointed with 2655 fps and ES of 50. I am not saying this is to be blamed on Hornady (although it is possible), I am merely asking if anyone has experienced anything similar with regards to recently purchased (i.e. since the plague shortage began) Hornady factory 6.5 CM ammo. Obviously the Berger numbers exceeded my expectations, but I included those numbers primarily to show that the rifle doesn't have a "slow barrel".
     
    FWIW: Just to beat a dead horse... this is from a GAS gun and it's pretty good:

    Hornady 140gr ELD-M (rifle cooled for 30 minutes) - SD and ES literally half of the prior string.
    Series No14
    Total number of shots10
    Units velocityfps
    Units distancesyd
    Units kinetic energyft-lbf
    Units weightgrain (gr)
    Stats - Average2670.78fps
    Stats - Highest2680.92fps
    Stats - Lowest2656.47fps
    Stats - Ext. Spread24.45fps
    Stats - Std. Dev7.15fps

    I'm wondering if you rifle just doesn't like the Hornady rounds?
     
    FWIW: Just to beat a dead horse... this is from a GAS gun and it's pretty good:

    Hornady 140gr ELD-M (rifle cooled for 30 minutes) - SD and ES literally half of the prior string.
    Series No14
    Total number of shots10
    Units velocityfps
    Units distancesyd
    Units kinetic energyft-lbf
    Units weightgrain (gr)
    Stats - Average2670.78fps
    Stats - Highest2680.92fps
    Stats - Lowest2656.47fps
    Stats - Ext. Spread24.45fps
    Stats - Std. Dev7.15fps

    I'm wondering if you rifle just doesn't like the Hornady rounds?

    Yes, that certainly could be. I figured if I was the only one who was getting less than ideal numbers that is likely to be the case, but if other people were seeing the same thing (low velocity, high ES, etc) on recently manufactured Hornady factory ammo then maybe something on their end to be aware of. I have pretty much always used the Hornady stuff in the past and never was disappointed (until now). It tends to be easier to get than Berger ammo so I certainly would like to have it as an option, but not if it's going to (under)perform as it has (at least in my rifle).
     
    My expectations (which were NOT of having an the ES in teens, nor of a single digit SD) were derived from having much better results with the Hornady 140 ELD Match (and 143 ELD-X) ammo a few years back with a different rifle, as well as a few friends I shoot with who were also using the same stuff in their rifles. While I wasn't expecting an ES in the teens, I also wasn't expecting an ES of 50. I was mostly surprised at the slower velocity. Regardless, I think it reasonable to be disappointed with 2655 fps and ES of 50. I am not saying this is to be blamed on Hornady (although it is possible), I am merely asking if anyone has experienced anything similar with regards to recently purchased (i.e. since the plague shortage began) Hornady factory 6.5 CM ammo. Obviously the Berger numbers exceeded my expectations, but I included those numbers primarily to show that the rifle doesn't have a "slow barrel".
    Now, now....calming breath, I wasn't throwing you any shade. Just wondered where your expectations for ES/SD on factory ammo came from as I have not found any factory ammo that does much better than what you found when a sufficient sized set of data is looked at.

    These are LabRadar data in 24" Proof SS with ELD-M...excuse the 147 gr....got a little carried away with Snipping Tool! haha

    1620691100635.png


    Now this is what I have from Berger and Prime....not a lot different.
    1620691267193.png


    And Federal with Berger 135 Hybrid Hunter and FGGM

    1620691346260.png


    I don't have any factory ammo chrono'd that meets what you are looking for or what @GBMaryland got but his data includes only 10 data points so I wonder how that set would look if he had a much larger set. All 72 shots of the Hornaday 140 gr came out to average of 2807 fps, ES on them all of 94 due to one very slow outlier and if I toss that one out there is another just 10 fps faster but both are outliers in a 72 shot data set (and wtf knows why these two/three are so slow), and an SD of 17.

    I to believe that Hndy QA has gone a bit slack as they are totally in the weeds. I'm finding the occasional brand new cartridge that is very hard to close the bolt on due to excessive width near the base.

    Best of luck to you.
     
    Last edited:
    I have to look at the manufacturing date on all of that 147 and 140 stuff I have, but I suspect that if you were to sort by weight the outliers can be removed.

    Granted I’d probably only do that if I knew I needed X number of rounds for a particular match... and it would be annoying to actually have to do that at all. However I do do that with all of my brass anyway, when I’m loading for myself.

    I would suspect that just about every recent ammunition manufacturers loads may be a little more out of spec due to the pace of manufacture, as implied.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Baron23
    Now, now....calming breath, I wasn't throwing you any shade. Just wondered where your expectations for ES/SD on factory ammo came from as I have not found any factory ammo that does much better than what you found when a sufficient sized set of data is looked at.

    These are LabRadar data in 24" Proof SS with ELD-M...excuse the 147 gr....got a little carried away with Snipping Tool! haha

    View attachment 7622491

    Now this is what I have from Berger and Prime....not a lot different.
    View attachment 7622496

    And Federal with Berger 135 Hybrid Hunter and FGGM

    View attachment 7622497

    I don't have any factory ammo chrono'd that meets what you are looking for or what @GBMaryland got but his data includes only 10 data points so I wonder how that set would look if he had. All 72 shots of the Hornaday 140 gr came out to average of 2807 fps, ES on them all of 94 due to one very slow outlier and if I toss that one out there is another just 10 fps faster but both are outliers in a 72 shot data set (and wtf knows why these two/three are so slow), and an SD of 17.

    I to believe that Hndy QA has gone a bit slack as they are totally in the weeds. I'm finding the occasional brand new cartridge that is very hard to close the bolt on due to excessive width near the base.

    Best of luck to you.

    Thank you very much for your detailed response, it is much appreciated.

    While you do show pretty high numbers for ES, your SD numbers seem to be quite respectable for factory ammo. I am not a pro at numbers by any measure, but I would think that while the larger sample size is certainly better and more advantageous for avg & SD it opens up the door for wide ES. If I fire 5 rounds and get a 50 ES that seems to be worse than firing 30 rounds and getting a 50 ES....the more rounds one fires the more likely that outliers will occur and thus increase the ES. If one were to fire 100 rounds I would expect that ES to get even higher, even while maintaining a solid average and very good SD.

    Your data from the 140 ELD factory ammo shows you're averaging about 2800 fps from a 24" Proof barrel, I also was using a 24 inch Proof barrel and averaging 2655. And while I certainly wasn't expecting anywhere close to 2800, I was at least expecting in the neighborhood of their 2710 advertised velocity. I typically only chrono for 10 rounds as I have a Magnetospeed and it changes my POI so I feel like I am wasting ammo when I use it, but I mostly am looking for avg fps for my dope, and to a lesser extent ES/SD for consistency.

    I don't think my Hornady numbers are horrible, but just not what I have come to expect from my experience with it in the past. I certainly do not expect handload-quality numbers from factory ammo, but the numbers I am getting from my recent (post-pandemic) purchases are not what I have been used to seeing in the past with Hornady match grade ammo.
     
    I would think that while the larger sample size is certainly better and more advantageous for avg & SD it opens up the door for wide ES. If I fire 5 rounds and get a 50 ES that seems to be worse than firing 30 rounds and getting a 50 ES....the more rounds one fires the more likely that outliers will occur and thus increase the ES. If one were to fire 100 rounds I would expect that ES to get even higher, even while maintaining a solid average and very good SD.
    Well, I hated statistics and almost failed it....and don't remember squat.

    BUT, each shot is an individual event without correlation to any other shot and I think that one could have the first two shots be outliers both high and low for an very high ES as easily as not. But I should think that the chances of getting to an outlier increases with the data set size. And yes, the larger the data set, the better the SD should be even if the ES was driven by a few outliers.

    Hey, anybody here a statistician (Benjamin Disraeli "lies, damn lies, and statistics haha)

    shows you're averaging about 2800 fps from a 24" Proof barrel,
    Yes, its a fast barrel and ALL of my 6.5 CM data with all different factory loads exceeds the box MV. AND my LabRadar is working fine as ELD-X 178 gr .308 does indeed clock at avg of 2,500 fps so....dunno why this 6.5 barrel is so fast.

    Is yours a SS or CF? Mine is SS with MTU contour.

    numbers I am getting from my recently (post-pandemic) purchases are not what I have been used to seeing in the past with Hornady match grade ammo.
    Yeah, I think these guys are running 24x7 making ammo and QA is suffering as you would expect. Personally, I'm just glad to have ammo right now.

    Best of luck.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: canezach
    Well, I hated statistics and almost failed it....and don't remember squat.

    BUT, each shot is an individual event without correlation to any other shot and I think that one could have the first two shots be outliers both high and low for an very high ES as easily as not. But I should think that the chances of getting to an outlier increases with the data set size. And yes, the larger the data set, the better the SD should be even if the ES was driven by a few outliers.

    Hey, anybody here a statistician (Benjamin Disraeli "lies, damn lies, and statistics haha)


    Yes, its a fast barrel and ALL of my 6.5 CM data with all different factory loads exceeds the box MV. AND my LabRadar is working fine as ELD-X 178 gr .308 does indeed clock at avg of 2,500 fps so....dunno why this 6.5 barrel is so fast.

    Is yours a SS or CF? Mine is SS with MTU contour.


    Yeah, I think these guys are running 24x7 making ammo and QA is suffering as you would expect. Personally, I'm just glad to have ammo right now.

    Best of luck.
    Agreed on all counts! I am also glad to have ammo (even though it hurts a bit to click that "place order" button at times).

    It a CF Sendero profile.

    Thanks for your replies and my best to you as well!!!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Baron23
    How does it shoot?
    Accuracy-wise it shoots very good with the factory loads I have run through it, which has only been 3 types...140 ELD, Berger 144, and 143 ELD-X. I didn't chrono the ELD-X's, just ran half a box through out of curiosity.
     
    My new-ish 140 ELDM Factory ammo is running 2700 with SD in the teens through a broken-in 26" Bartlein M24 spun by Altus.
    The ammo still shoots bugholes, but is slow AF. My buddy shoots factory Berger 144 ammo going 2800+ in a 26", FML!
    I'm hoping the Prime 130 Backorder arrives soon, lol.
     
    They're probably scrounging like the rest of us...may not be the same recipe they've been using (100% speculation on my behalf). However, if you go to Midway and look up their 147gr ELD-M, it says "discontinued." Wondering if that's due to the raw materials shortages, or they're looking at another projectile?
     
    Midway uses poor wording and often puts that on stuff they aren't carrying, not that the manufacturer actually discontinued it.
    ^^^This. I got a notice from Midway that CCI 450s were "discontinued."
     
    I haven't shot factory Hornady ammo since it was loaded with the Amax, so I don't really have anything to add except for a thought:

    Is it possible what were seeing is lower QC due to extreme demand forcing products to be rushed? Hear me out. All of these manufacturers are saying their production levels are at unprecedented highs, which likely means they're putting some inexperienced folks along the assembly line, and with higher QC standards, the product takes longer to ship, so maybe their standards are relaxed a little and something slips through that would normally be rejected

    Edit: I missed it the first time, but I'm in agreement with the last comment from @Baron23 above.
     
    Last edited:
    I haven't shot factory Hornady ammo since it was loaded with the Amax, so I don't really have anything to add except for a thought:

    Is it possible what were seeing is lower QC due to extreme demand forcing products to be rushed? Hear me out. All of these manufacturers are saying their production levels are at unprecedented highs, which likely means they're putting some inexperienced folks along the assembly line, and with higher QC standards, the product takes longer to ship, so maybe their standards are relaxed a little and something slips through that would normally be rejected
    Yes, that's kind of what I was thinking is possible, if not probable.
     
    Well, it could have gotten worse recently, but I see similar ES/SD numbers as the OP on 140ELD I'm shooting now that was purchased in 2018 and stored in optimal conditions. My MV numbers from a 26" Krieger with 3000 rounds on it are still pushing 2800 though (but quite a bit less if it's cold weather). Out of my 26" AXMC (maybe 300 rounds on it) the same ammo is at least 50 fps slower. Yet in the AXMC that Berger 144 ammo just gave me a 10 shot string of MV-2849, ES - 25, SD - 8.4. In other words, Berger ammo is loaded HOT. I had to get the Small Firing Pin 308 bolt for the AXMC to shoot it because the Large pin bolt allowed the primers to blow.
     
    Well, it could have gotten worse recently, but I see similar ES/SD numbers as the OP on 140ELD I'm shooting now that was purchased in 2018 and stored in optimal conditions. My MV numbers from a 26" Krieger with 3000 rounds on it are still pushing 2800 though (but quite a bit less if it's cold weather). Out of my 26" AXMC (maybe 300 rounds on it) the same ammo is at least 50 fps slower. Yet in the AXMC that Berger 144 ammo just gave me a 10 shot string of MV-2849, ES - 25, SD - 8.4. In other words, Berger ammo is loaded HOT. I had to get the Small Firing Pin 308 bolt for the AXMC to shoot it because the Large pin bolt allowed the primers to blow.
    The Berger has always been loaded particularly warm, but dammit, it's so freaking accurate!!! It was my factory ammo of choice because it shot so well and it's loaded in Lapua brass
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Baron23
    The Berger has always been loaded particularly warm, but dammit, it's so freaking accurate!!! It was my factory ammo of choice because it shot so well and it's loaded in Lapua brass
    Absolutely correct.
     
    Was going to post in the 6.5CM Main thread but this thread matches the topic to the "T".
    Curiosity or just checking baseline I was also surprised (and disappointed) of the speed I saw from the factory 140gr ELD M.
    (24" 1-8 Howa).

    Not sure how the OP confirmed a 24" test barrel from Hornady but maybe they tested out of a 26" to get the advertised 2710 FPS? Its the only thing I could think of to compensate for the low velocity.

    1705194105776.png
     
    Was going to post in the 6.5CM Main thread but this thread matches the topic to the "T".
    Curiosity or just checking baseline I was also surprised (and disappointed) of the speed I saw from the factory 140gr ELD M.
    (24" 1-8 Howa).

    Not sure how the OP confirmed a 24" test barrel from Hornady but maybe they tested out of a 26" to get the advertised 2710 FPS? Its the only thing I could think of to compensate for the low velocity.

    View attachment 8322374

    Screenshot_20240114_113703_Chrome.jpg