• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

FCX Caldwell Sled review

plastikosmd

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 6, 2010
98
3
51
I own a couple big rifles. ( One Blackpowder gun rifle shoots a 1750 grain projectile with 300-350 grains of blackpowder behind it.) I had some recoil concerns I started shopping for a recoil sled. The FCX looked cool and I figured I would give it a try.

Fit/finish and design= rest appears well built. The cantilever front rest design was slightly concerning for me. Several of my big guns weigh from 25-75 lbs or so. The front rest is not going to be able to support them. After looking at this I felt that maybe I could just use the sled function and use a separate front rest. I also have some non-classic buttstocks that won’t quite fit into the rear rest. These guns are special so I can’t blame the rest. Otherwise it is built well.


Support = overall good, I had one bag leak I had to epoxy but got a second bag from manufacturer so now I have two. If one of yours springs a leak, just glue it.


So I took the rest to the range and started working up a load for my 7.62x51. Off bags I was well under 0.5 MOA but with the rest and the new loads I was struggling for 0.75 MOA. I felt the front of the rest was drifting under load and recoil, requiring adjustment and almost the need to keep your hand on the control to hold through the shot.

Not sure what was going on, today I grabbed my most accurate rifle. 40x Remington 22-250 topped with an Unertl Programmer 24x (I like the old scopes!). Not really a "sniper rifle," I know (unless you are a chipmunk!) Nevertheless, the best the rifle has shot was a 0.081 5 shot off of bags. That is not to be expected and I'm sure was luck. Generally it shoots around 0.200 or a bit less. Today was 15 degrees with 15 mph winds (or more it seemed). I shot the rifle for 10 rounds using the rest and picked the best of the 2 groups. I then shot off my bags, typical fashion to make sure the rifle was not the issue. I then shot in a hybrid redneck form. Removed the front fire control and sat my box and bags on the sled. I had to do this as the rear is so high and I did not have a front rest that was high enough with me.
FCX with fire control= best was 0.616 top left picture
Bags alone = 0.210 middle picture
FCX with front bag = 0.126 bottom left picture
In the end, I like the design of the sled portion but will not be using the fire control. I had snugged up the fire control portion when going from the 7.62x51 to the 22-250. This did improve control but made it more stiff and hard to adjust a small amount and still felt it was drifting, as noted above. For hunting/scope setup/test fire it would be great and maybe I asking too much of the system. Of course this is not scientific and is based only on my rest and rifle, YMMV.

fcxtest.jpg
 
Re: FCX Caldwell Sled review

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jackalope33B</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So if Im reading your post correctly, your shots are more accurate with out the sled? </div></div>

Thats what i'm getting out of it... Interesting!!
 
Re: FCX Caldwell Sled review

No shit! I had made a post a few days ago asking for suggestions on using a sled to see how accurate my rifle is.. Here ya go!
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3102355


<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: StanwoodSpartan</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jackalope33B</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So if Im reading your post correctly, your shots are more accurate with out the sled? </div></div>

Thats what i'm getting out of it... Interesting!! </div></div>
 
Re: FCX Caldwell Sled review

Pictures indicate to me that 1st and 3rd groups were shot with the sled; 1st was sled with rest in front, 3rd was sled chassis with bag in front. 2nd group was without sled; bags in front and back. Looks like the sled chassis with bags up front instead of front rest gave the best results, but bags only were pretty close.
 
Re: FCX Caldwell Sled review

that is pretty much it.

my main goal was recoil reduction for my big guns so I needed a sled. the FCX looked cool and had the fire control so I figured I would spend the extra money.

The fire control was less accurate than bags alone (out of many groups, never got close to what I could do off of bags, I was struggling with my 7.62x51) Kinda stinks as I thought it was the loads and now I have to go back and re-try those. I pulled out my trusty tackdriver 22-250 to test.


FCX with fire control attached (their front rest) I could not get my rifle to shoot.

I switched to bags and confirmed the rifle still shoots. ( 0.2 average agg, range is 0.081 best to maybe 0.250 with current load on a bad day.)


Using just the sled and setting a box on top of the rest and a bag on top of that (not so steady), then holding the buttstock on my thumb to adjust height I shot one group (my last 5 rounds I had with me) and managed 0.126. This is not my best group with the rifle and falls into my average for the gun but may show that using the sled alone doesn't seem to alter my accuracy. POI did change a small amount it seems.

In conclusion, the FCX is cool but the front rest fire control needs some work if used for precision IMHO. It is fine for sight-in, a big hunting gun or something. The design is such that the rest is cantilevered quite a bit on a single post and the control is both difficult to maintain and adjust for fine movement. It would also never support my 30-70 lb rifles but that was not expected.
As far as my use, i will still use the sled, and remove the front rest, shorten up the sled to help with recoil and use my own front rest