Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We'll be announcing the winner early next week, keep an eye out!
See the contestI second @Maurygold suggestions, especially for a novice reloader. The copper solids are somewhat finicky and have a very narrow powder load "range".I want to shoot cutting edge mtac 182 g...I'm new to reloading....first attempt.
Yep, unless you are forced to shoot lead-free where you will be shooting.I second @Maurygold suggestions, especially for a novice reloader. The copper solids are somewhat finicky and have a very narrow powder load "range".
Being new... I think I might go with @Maurygold suggestions. Possibly even SMK 168 or 175Yep, unless you are forced to shoot lead-free where you will be shooting.
I have some lapua brass from the Berger ammo that I shot. 185 juggernaut tactical.That’s a fine option to start with on reloading. Spend the money on brass though if you’re serious about reloading - that is worth going premium on and lapua is the only choice for premium 308
I’d probably buy some lapua scenar loaded ammo to benchmark from and keep the brass
Thank you so muchFor the 182 gr copper bullets 1.475" long, 56 gr H2O case capacity.
You'll be looking at max loads in this area.
Max load work up!
2.8" COAL
40.5 GR VARGET.
2.940" COAL
42.1 GR VARGET
A huge difference in pressure as to what your COAL is going to be.
The long 200 gr eldx at 2.8" or 212 eldx at 3" COAL from the Hornady manual is a better guide for the long 182 gr solid copper bullet.
Solid copper has a higher start pressure than lead of the "same weight", and is longer taking up more powder space than lead with the same COAL.
Can't go wrong with the classic 168 or 175. The SMK 169 and 177 have shown great long-range results. Since you plan on single-loading/firing, the extra COAL of those projectiles won't be an issue if you won't be limited on keeping them at magazine length.Possibly even SMK 168 or 175
Thank youCan't go wrong with the classic 168 or 175. The SMK 169 and 177 have shown great long-range results. Since you plan on single-loading/firing, the extra COAL of those projectiles won't be an issue if you won't be limited on keeping them at magazine length.
I find the 169’s to be the shit.Can't go wrong with the classic 168 or 175. The SMK 169 and 177 have shown great long-range results. Since you plan on single-loading/firing, the extra COAL of those projectiles won't be an issue if you won't be limited on keeping them at magazine length.