Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

[Subxero]

Looking for thoughts and opinions

i want to buy a new press for loading up my new .300rum and these two are at the top of my list

thanks in advance
joe

 

[krlemas]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

I use the Redding and love it I can load up to 375 Cheytac without any problems.

Ken

 

[Clark]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

I reload more than 60 cartridges, mostly overload experiments on guns I dissect.

The co-ax is great for fast changes of dies and case head sizes.

It also takes less coordination to get the case close to the jaws than to slide a case into a shell holder. That makes it a little faster and easier on the back.

 

[X-fan]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

I bought both and kept the CO-AX.
I load from 223 to 500 A-Square on the Co-AX

The big Redding does nothing special IMHO.

 

[Subxero]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

all sounds good, the co-ax is cheaper anyway

 

[arnie19]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

The coax is limited in die hight ,other than that its great. Arnie

 

[SilencercoJames]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

just got my coax last week. Love it. But my former press was a old ass rcbs partner. So.....

 

[427Cobra]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: arnie19</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The coax is limited in die hight ,other than that its great. Arnie </div></div>

The B3 version will seat 338LM with no clearance issues

 

[mkollman74]

Re: Forster co-ax vs redding ultra mag

I love my co-ax.