Fundamentally different results from sig 10k vs kestrel/ab quantum

[davethedog]

Has anyone else had issues getting matching results from the sig AB software compared to kestrel or AB quantum?

The sig seems to be reporting smaller wind holds and slightly different elevation differences when compared to the kestrel/quantum apps.

I have matched all target and environmental between the platforms and I don’t have any MV truing or calibration data in any of the profiles.

I can reproduce this regardless of whether the profiles are CDM or g7 and regardless of whether I sync them from the sig software or AB quantum.

 

[seansmd]

Not sure if you resolved this?

Check if you have auto bullet length enabled on one of the devices, and AJ and spin drift enabled on the sig. The are in by default in the kestrel and driven off of wind 1 i believe.