Let me start by introducing myself. My name is Mike, 23 year old from California. New to this forum. I've been shooting since I was 4-5. I just recently finished (well, almost finished) my first AR build. Was trying to make this a budget build, so didn't wanna go too crazy with all the parts. I get wholesale prices through RSR group, zanders, and I believe midway as well.
so as my AR sits now, here are the specs
• Tactical Machining Lower
• Spike's stripped upper
• Daniel Defense bolt
• Daniel Defense 16" barrel 1:7 twist
• ATI milspec buffer tube
• Magpul MOE Milspec stock
• Magpul MOE carbine handguard
• Magpul MOE grip
• Magpul L5 picatinny rail
• Magpul AFG2 grip
• Magpul B.A.D. Lever
• Magpul gen2 rear MBUS flip up sight
I'm stuck on which Scope to get. I have a 100 yard range 15mins from my house, and a 200 yard range that's not too far either. A few times a year, we go camping/shooting where I have access to 1000yds. I'd probably never shoot this rifle any more than 300-400yds (just a couple times a year), but frequenting the 100yd and 200yd ranges.
I've got a Leupold vx-ii 3-9x on my .22 that I've been shooting for years. Also got a Leupold Gold ring on my .300 WM. The two that I think I've narrowed it down to are the Leupold Mark AR 3-9x and the Nikon m223 3-12x w/bdc 600.
I like that the Nikon has the bdc 600 reticle, that from what I've read, is pretty accurate with 55gr rounds, but I'm not sure how it'd do with a heavier grain bullet. I just ordered the lake city federal xm855 (62gr) deal from cheaper than dirt, and will be using them to fire my first shots from this rifle next weekend at the 200yd range. Depending on accuracy out of the box with these, will determine if I'd be doing reloads or not. If I did, I've been looking into the Barne's TSX rounds (most likely the 70gr). In saying this, I'm also asking if anyone knows how the BDC600 on the Nikon will do with heavier grain bullets? I've used and shot many guns with Leupold glass, and am very pleased with their products. But this Nikon seemed to fit my platform, and price point.
I can get the Nikon for about $340 and the Leupold for around $375. Was going to mount them on the American Defense recon quick disco mount, so I have the ability to take off the glass and shoot iron sights when I want.
So my questions to those of you that have used either or both, for my application, what would you think would be a better purchase? I'm also open to other options for around the same price point.
Thanks for reading, and for any help.
so as my AR sits now, here are the specs
• Tactical Machining Lower
• Spike's stripped upper
• Daniel Defense bolt
• Daniel Defense 16" barrel 1:7 twist
• ATI milspec buffer tube
• Magpul MOE Milspec stock
• Magpul MOE carbine handguard
• Magpul MOE grip
• Magpul L5 picatinny rail
• Magpul AFG2 grip
• Magpul B.A.D. Lever
• Magpul gen2 rear MBUS flip up sight
I'm stuck on which Scope to get. I have a 100 yard range 15mins from my house, and a 200 yard range that's not too far either. A few times a year, we go camping/shooting where I have access to 1000yds. I'd probably never shoot this rifle any more than 300-400yds (just a couple times a year), but frequenting the 100yd and 200yd ranges.
I've got a Leupold vx-ii 3-9x on my .22 that I've been shooting for years. Also got a Leupold Gold ring on my .300 WM. The two that I think I've narrowed it down to are the Leupold Mark AR 3-9x and the Nikon m223 3-12x w/bdc 600.
I like that the Nikon has the bdc 600 reticle, that from what I've read, is pretty accurate with 55gr rounds, but I'm not sure how it'd do with a heavier grain bullet. I just ordered the lake city federal xm855 (62gr) deal from cheaper than dirt, and will be using them to fire my first shots from this rifle next weekend at the 200yd range. Depending on accuracy out of the box with these, will determine if I'd be doing reloads or not. If I did, I've been looking into the Barne's TSX rounds (most likely the 70gr). In saying this, I'm also asking if anyone knows how the BDC600 on the Nikon will do with heavier grain bullets? I've used and shot many guns with Leupold glass, and am very pleased with their products. But this Nikon seemed to fit my platform, and price point.
I can get the Nikon for about $340 and the Leupold for around $375. Was going to mount them on the American Defense recon quick disco mount, so I have the ability to take off the glass and shoot iron sights when I want.
So my questions to those of you that have used either or both, for my application, what would you think would be a better purchase? I'm also open to other options for around the same price point.
Thanks for reading, and for any help.