Hasn’t the USSC already ruled that MSRs were protected under the 2A?
- Thread starter SilentStalkr
- Start date
Under Miller there is no denying they would be "in common use" and endemic to the personal arms of a typical "organized militia" therefore exactly the types of arms intended for "The People" comprising the main body of "the militia".
Trench guns and SBRs would have been approved had Miller lived and his lawyers laid out the TOE of a platoon in service at that time.
Trench guns and SBRs would have been approved had Miller lived and his lawyers laid out the TOE of a platoon in service at that time.
Exactly what I thought. So, if they have already ruled in this then how come we are coming full circle again. If we can just willy billy change things based on mob rule then do we really have any kind of order? I mean it is kind of my understanding that they hear cases and make a ruling and that should be the ruling, end of story until something different comes along that might sort of involve the same issues. But this back and forth crap gets old. It either is or it isn’t.
I couldn't give two shits what the Supremes say about guns.
