Don't want to get into a "which scope is better" discussion, just looking for factual information. I haven't purchased a scope in a few years and I'm in the market for a new scope for an M14 that I will shoot out to 1000 yards. It used to wear a Schmidt & Bender 3-12 but no longer. My other scopes have been Schmidts as well and the intent was to top it off with a Schmidt 3-20 to stay consistent with my gear for familiarity reasons.
The conundrum I'm at is that the market has become more competitive in the last few years and Leupold for one has certainly caught my eye with their Mark 6 3-18. I could probably save myself a grand by going with the Leupold but by no means do I want to sell myself short. Subtracting weight and saving money is a good thing unless the end result to the user is an inferior product based on what I'm used to.
Any thoughts on this?
The conundrum I'm at is that the market has become more competitive in the last few years and Leupold for one has certainly caught my eye with their Mark 6 3-18. I could probably save myself a grand by going with the Leupold but by no means do I want to sell myself short. Subtracting weight and saving money is a good thing unless the end result to the user is an inferior product based on what I'm used to.
Any thoughts on this?