• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Hornady 224 Valkyrie Brass is real!

Subwrx300

Major Hide Member
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 15, 2014
1,381
976
Cedar Springs, MI
Look what just showed up! 100 pcs of 224 Valkyrie brass by Hornady!

Edited below to show inital data from Hornady vs Federal dimensions.
IMG_20180720_150623.jpg

I'll put up some comparisons to the Federal virgin (I have several hundred). Will be putting up virgin overall weight, virgin case H2O capacity, fired H2O capacity, virgin shoulder measurement before and after fired shoulder growth. Plus pictures.

Will be shooting in a few known loads to see if any improvement over federal in terms of new and once fired. Will report back on if any pockets get loose quickly or more slowly than Federal (number of firings.)

Anything else you guys want to see/know?
________________________
Followup- Quick post of basic dimensions: Web Diameter, OAL Untrimmed, Base to .330 Diameter Shoulder, Dry Weight. Next series to include H2O Capacity (after trimming to 1.587 for Hornady and 1.591 for Federal), neck thickness (measuring loaded necks) and fired case capacity.

Basically identical except for three points: Hornady is .001" bigger in diameter around web, Hornady is ~2 grains heavier and has ~40% less weight variation. This may not mean much until we get water weights, but its definitely a start in the right direction.

Visually, Hornady is not as polished (shiny) as Federal but the inside of the necks seem duller and more uniform (notice darker necks than Federals streaky necks).
Update: 7/21/19: added fired water capacity variation and groups from virgin brass with Hornady. Seems to be about 40% less case variation in H2O capacity both virgin and fired. The Hornady brass was only chamfered and deburred, not trimmed to same OAL, so I would expect the variation to decrease if all cases set to exactly same length. The Federal WAS trimmed/chamfered/deburred prior to firing (had already done it prior to test) and it was on second firing; this means what you see is about as good as Federal can get... Hornady seems to win in the consistency category. Better consistency, better primer pockets, slightly larger web, better overall weight control and not quite as soft as Federal.

Stats and pictures below for those that want them. Note that the web, OAL, Base to Shoulder and initial dry weights are of 50 cases and remaining numbers are 15 (expect virgin H2O, which is only 10 because its a bit meaningless).
224V Hornady vs Federal Brass Dimensions.PNG

More to come....
IMG_20180720_224112.jpg

IMG_20180720_224304.jpg

IMG_20180720_224052.jpg

IMG_20180720_224246.jpg

IMG_20180721_130922.jpg
IMG_20180721_131237.jpg

IMG_20180721_131643.jpg

Hornady on Left - Federal on Right...

Group from virgin Brass is bottom right two groups. Velocity is combined for both groups (same load) fired back to back. Factory 90SMK top right and a 223 Match for comparison in two upper left groups. I shot the Valkyrie with my backup lower and optic to test the 223 and didn't feel like switching due to time constraint. trigger was terrible for groups with 224 V as it was a polished mil-spec with JP spring kit. Says 4lbs but sure doesn't feel like it; very tough to control left/right with that trigger.
IMG_20180721_215937.jpg
 
Last edited:
Another quick update: virgin Hornady has about .5 grain less capacity than virgin federal. This may only be due to OAL difference but I'm mainly concerned with uniformed, once fired water capacity. And the primer pockets do feel a bit tighter even initially seating empty cups. The same 5 cups put into Hornady and Federal, the Federals felt very loose whereas Hornady felt fairly tight.
 
Just curious if you could add a picture of the headstamp.
Hornady has and probably still does use alot S&B brass for the 68spc just curious if they will for the 224V.

The Hornady is heavier and has less capacity than the S&B but is higher quality IMO.
 
Just seated 50 primers into the Hornady... WAAAAYYYY BETTER than Federal. It feels exactly like Hornady 6.5CM: firm smooth seating with constant pressure from the start and firm stop.

By contrast, Federal starts almost empty and resistance increases but never quite reaches "firm" resistance. Also the stop is not solid, feels mushy when they bottom out.

Super pumped to see how these feel after first fire. Some Federal feels way loose even new and after firing they get very very light pressure to seat primer.
 
Updated original post with fired H2O capacities and more data plus groups. Hornady definitely took steps in the right direction and overall, this seems to be great brass. I haven't tried Starline yet but it has been pretty good in my 6.5CM. Without having tested Starline brass, I can't say that Hornady is worth nearly 2x more than Starline or almost 2.5x Federal brass, but if I get 8 reloads with Hornady vs 3-4 with Federal, its a wash, with tie breaker going to consistency of Hornady.