From Reddit
The 3rd Circuit recently heard Hollis v Holder, now Hollis v Barr, en banc and ruled that 18 US Code 922(o) is unconstitutional because it does not pass the Heller Test, namely that legal machineguns are not dangerous because crimes are not committed with them. Therefore, they are not dangerous and unusual. That's the gist, anyway. Finer points of the opinion allegedly contain bits that are similar to the recent case out of California with regards to the magazine ban. I'm waiting on a lawyer to post the opinion, should have it by late in the day. In any case, you can now form 1 to full awesome
The 3rd Circuit recently heard Hollis v Holder, now Hollis v Barr, en banc and ruled that 18 US Code 922(o) is unconstitutional because it does not pass the Heller Test, namely that legal machineguns are not dangerous because crimes are not committed with them. Therefore, they are not dangerous and unusual. That's the gist, anyway. Finer points of the opinion allegedly contain bits that are similar to the recent case out of California with regards to the magazine ban. I'm waiting on a lawyer to post the opinion, should have it by late in the day. In any case, you can now form 1 to full awesome
