I just seen this in Yahoo news:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts1361
I saw that there was a different thread pertaining to this that talked about the group kill a cop her:
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1722955&gonew=1#UNREAD
The reason I started a new thread is because I wanted to talk about this in a different context.
My immediate thoughts on this situation are, "I wonder if this is how it begins?"
I'm not saying they didn't try to target a cop or do illegal activities because I don't know the truth behind any of it. But I'm left to ponder that maybe this isn't all of the story. That maybe targeting this particular group was easy and a way to get the public on the sympathetic side of the government. One militia being bad, in the eyes of everyone else, is all militias being bad. Like if one Marine rapes a 12yr old, all Marines are rapist. Kind of a similar idea.
I guess what it feels to me is the old quote, "When they came for me, nobody was left to help."
I'm not a religious person, not in a militia, nor do I condone terror acts. But as a person who appreciates his right to the first two options, I think that those who didn't want people to have those rights, a slow targeting of militias and branding them "domestic terrorist" in the media, is a smart way to get rid of them.
And as for the acts of terror, I think the word "terrorist" gets thrown around a little lightly. Not calling any of them revolutionist or anything, but I'm left to wonder what our forefathers were called by the British.
Oh well, I guess only time will tell on this one. The "facts" arn't all out yet. And so far this is one group.
Guess we'll just have to see what happens.
Whats everyone's thoughts on this?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts1361
I saw that there was a different thread pertaining to this that talked about the group kill a cop her:
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1722955&gonew=1#UNREAD
The reason I started a new thread is because I wanted to talk about this in a different context.
My immediate thoughts on this situation are, "I wonder if this is how it begins?"
I'm not saying they didn't try to target a cop or do illegal activities because I don't know the truth behind any of it. But I'm left to ponder that maybe this isn't all of the story. That maybe targeting this particular group was easy and a way to get the public on the sympathetic side of the government. One militia being bad, in the eyes of everyone else, is all militias being bad. Like if one Marine rapes a 12yr old, all Marines are rapist. Kind of a similar idea.
I guess what it feels to me is the old quote, "When they came for me, nobody was left to help."
I'm not a religious person, not in a militia, nor do I condone terror acts. But as a person who appreciates his right to the first two options, I think that those who didn't want people to have those rights, a slow targeting of militias and branding them "domestic terrorist" in the media, is a smart way to get rid of them.
And as for the acts of terror, I think the word "terrorist" gets thrown around a little lightly. Not calling any of them revolutionist or anything, but I'm left to wonder what our forefathers were called by the British.
Oh well, I guess only time will tell on this one. The "facts" arn't all out yet. And so far this is one group.
Guess we'll just have to see what happens.
Whats everyone's thoughts on this?