Re: Is my scope too high?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WRM</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BFD711</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think one advantage of having the scope closer to bore would be to limit the the influence canting the rifle would have on bullet trajectory.</div></div>
How?...
I doubt that scope height has any effect at all, as scope height is not considered in the "formula". Horizontal error formula would be (drop) * sine(cant angle)....
Bill </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BFD711</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
http://www.microlevel.biz/cant_errors.html
Second paragraph below figure#3.
</div></div>
From your link:
"If you look at the math (trigonometry), the effects of canting are not difficult to calculate. Let's assume the highest point of trajectory for a long-range shot is 48 inches. If you tilted your rifle 5°, then the horizontal bullet displacement would be 4.2 inches [cosine (90-5)*48]."
As I stated above, nowhere in this formula is scope height factored into the equation. Just because they "say" that "Use of large diameter objective scopes, mounted high off the barrel, exacerbates the cant error problem" doesn't make it so.
(Edited to add) I believe their formula, that I quoted above, is incorrect, also. They are using "highest point of trajectory" in their formula, so that is only "half" of the error. Note that I specified "drop", as in the complete flight path, not just the trip to the top....
Cheers,
Bill