• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

It will be a ground breaking moment when they finally consider shot placement.

Another total steaming pile of Bull droppings from the leftist idiot gun banners.

But at least it could let us have some fun debates on if a .45 will kill someone deader than a 9mm.....

Also same stupid liberals might take note that as they pile on these stupid magazine restrictions, well might as well have a bigger bullet for fun if you can have less of them per reload.
 
----------
If people are determined to kill someone, will they find a way?
----------


picard-facepalm.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cheyenne Bodie
"And advances in gun technology caused a new generation of weapons to hit the market — and eventually the streets. The newer guns, which started to become common in the 1990s, were semi-automatic. They could fire multiple rounds more quickly, and tended to be able to store more bullets in their magazines, meaning they required less reloading in long shootouts. "

- That's me - always on the leading edge. I have been carrying a semi-automatic since way before the 1990s.


“In general, the criminals who are using guns in crime do want the higher-caliber, more lethal weapons, and want the newest and sexiest,” said Roseanna Ander, the founding executive director of the Crime Lab at the University of Chicago. “But there is a big markup, and they sometimes can’t get them.”

- Bummer! The criminals can't afford the higher-caliber, more lethal, newest, sexiest weapons? Whatever will they do? Maybe get a job that pays more (more take home money)?


The police don’t always collect information about the caliber involved in shootings.

- No wonder the crimes go unsolved. It seems to me that might be a critical piece of evidence they might want to consider.



The trade-off between caliber and aim is, in part, why the F.B.I. and many police departments carry 9-millimeter guns rather than larger alternatives.

- I will talk with our Police Chief today and ask him when the department officers will convert to .22s.



I really appreciate this forum. I learn a bunch - especially from the links provided. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Sky Country
the funny part is that if they ever got their head out of their ass which will never happen, thank god

they could pass some gun laws that the average person/sportsman would agree to and the NRA would have a hard time fighting

good thing they are all a bunch of idiots make my collection feel safer
 
@lash

The liberal “men” (I use the term with great sarcasm) are usually backing into something else, so its just how they know to do things.

Stupid people cause me pain. They also keep me employed in a good paying job. So I just laugh and order more .45. bullets for reloading....... they work better!
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
What other product would they even consider that its main function be less capable?

I use my guns for the fun of testing accuracy. I want it to put bullets on top of bullets.

Should I misuse it to harm others than their answer is that the "capability" of my gun to hit what I am aiming at made it more deadly.

I also have my guns for the purpose of self defense. The only reason I would use it in that manner is because my own life is immediate danger. I need accuracy and perhaps caliber to stop whatever it is that threatens my life quickly.

Do they want me to have an "ineffective" tool for my defense and allow the "threat" to harm or kill me?

My automobile runs best on 4 wheels. It wont really work well with three. Most other cars would also be "crippled" if we removed one wheel.

Could we end all car crashes if we made cars less mobile.

I can prevent aircraft crashes by removing the wings.

Knives would cut fewer people if we didnt sharpen them.

Really what we need to do is take the means to communicate from journalists so as to prevent stupid journalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
Perhaps the Journal of the American Medical Association should publish articles on how reduce malpractice instead of bullet size.


Going to send them an email / letter addressing their history of anti-gun articles versus the incredibly high number of people killed by medical malpractice. I will post it here in the Pit as soon as I deliver it.

This letter will not include any of the well established pro-gun cliches such as "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Rather it will be a direct challenge to them regarding how they conveniently ignore all of the cases of preventable medical negligence that kills 225,000 people per year, and instead, focus on the nonexistent "gun problem" in order to take the spotlight off of them and the serious flaws in the medical industry.
 
Going to send them an email / letter addressing their history of anti-gun articles versus the incredibly high number of people killed by medical malpractice. I will post it here in the Pit as soon as I deliver it.

This letter will not include any of the well established pro-gun cliches such as "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Rather it will be a direct challenge to them regarding how they conveniently ignore all of the cases of preventable medical negligence that kills 225,000 people per year, and instead, focus on the nonexistent "gun problem" in order to take the spotlight off of them and the serious flaws in the medical industry.


Send it to them tomorrow or they will think its an April 1 prank.
 
Hell yeah! Thanks for heads up.

The gun rights front needs a bit of a redirection from the defensive to the offensive.

Time to emphasize #Priorities


Thank you for the effort.

Writing/arguing your point is time consuming and strenuous if you want to do it well.

Anyone can send a letter saying "You are a vapid cunt"

but....

if you want to change minds you have to work.