Re: Kel-Tec PF-9
When my BIL was looking for something smaller than his Glock 19 for "concealed carry and IN THE CAR!??" he asked about the Taurus 709 Slim. I suggested a PF-9, having shot one satisfatorily. I also suggested a Kahr. "I've read bad things about the KelTec and the Kahr is too expensive".
Of course, he had already made up his mind to get the Taurus.
After we figured out why he had a lot of non-feeds (bang, click) and bent the tabs out on the mag catch slots of his mags, he still didn't shoot it for squat. He got better with the Glock, though.
I think the barrel axis is just too high.
And you only get 2 fingers on the grip.
The Kahr P-9 I got used shoots like a dream, cloverleafs @ 7yd, MUCH more manageable. All 3 fingers fit on the grip.
Personally, I usually carry a P-32 KelTec (before their .380 was made) any time it's legal, sometimes with a S&W457 (745? single stack 7 shot SA/DA .45)
I found the PF-9 much easier to shoot than the Taurus.
The Kahr handles almost like the Glock, but as a single stack, it's WAY flatter and easier to hide. Trigger is better than a stock Glock.
Obviously, you should shoot first, before pulling the trigger, if possible.