Re: ladder vs ocw??
I use both.
I start with a quick 10 shot 400yd ladder with 2-3 prospective powders and take the ones that shoot together and go to the OCW. I record the environmentals and chronograph the all shots. Bad powders are quickly rejected.
In the OCW I go with much finer increments (0.1 grains in a 223 sized case and .2-.3 in a larger case) in 3-4 shot groups selected from the results of the ladder test. I record all conditions and velocities. I look carefully at velocity variation. This is baseline data collection and a fishing expedition that more than anything looks for consistency in group position. I am looking for the most forgiving loads and (because of the small increments) I always get some very rewarding groups.
By now I have the best powder(S), some very small groups, a powder velocity map, velocity spreads, and my OCW.
I end up with a ton of information to be processed and selected and almost always have a few very clear winners. I also have a good idea how temperature changes will affect my load's POI, group size, and velocity.
Despite original OCW methods I normally shoot at 200 yards (no wind only) as I can see vertical the chrono might have missed and have twice the scale to map POI changes.
I then got to the furthest range I will normally shoot the load and start fine tuning.