apple.news 
Yes and no. They still had to sign off on the payout I believe. Regardless, they should not have settled.
Supreme Court ruled that police have no obligation to enter. I believe that was after the stoneman Douglass shooting in ft lauderdale when the school SRO stayed outsideNever let an opportunity for a good money grab go to waste.
Something horrible happened.
Now someone needs to pay eleventy billion dollars to make it right. Cause... you know... justice.
You'd think they'd go after LEO for diddling themselves in the parking for the better part of an hour while shots were popping off inside, but no.
DD must be a more lucrative target.
business.libertymutual.com 
Remington shouldn’t have settle but plaintiff’s lawsuit wasn’t based solely on the fact that Remington made the gun, it was based on how the gun was as advertised. Remington(or someone at dpms) out of desperation I guess made some really stupid advertising choices, I believe they advertised the gun as the perfect killing machine or something to that affect and paid to have the gun with the name used in video games. I’m not saying this made them at fault but it did give the attorneys a chance to get around their exemption by making the argument they basically targeted unstable individuals in their advertising. DD that I’m aware of doesn’t have this issue, and while it’s obviously going to be expensive the lawsuit shouldn’t even make it past a motion to dismiss, federal law already has a specific immunity unless they can show some irresponsible act by the manufacturer. But this is one of the lines of attack by gun grabbers, just try and bankrupt anyone that has anything to do with the gun community.
I thought it was a Bushmaster ad (because they're cucks and sold out of ME to be part of that trash), and the ad said something like, "Get your man card back", or "man card reissued".
ehlinelaw.com 
They should have to send out flyers to the residents explaining this so one can prepare to defend one's family. This alone should be justification that they have to issue you a CC permit.There are two Supreme Court rulings that preceded the federal court ruling on Parkland:
Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Me? Can I Sue Police For Refusing Assistance?
NO! Police have zero duty to protect you from rioters, robbers, or criminals. You cannot sue the police for refusing to send help or make an arrest. You must defend yourself.
Yes your right Bushmaster my bad, yes I don’t remember the exact advertisement but there were more than a few when I read it I thought that was a really bad idea, and I’m firmly on the 2A side of the dial, I’m sure Remington’s lawyers reacted in horror, I don’t see DD having these issues, so unless there is something I’m completely unaware of this lawsuit would have to be based just on the fact they made the firearm, which is exactly what the federal immunity covers to the letter.
So if BM got themselves in trouble for implying that, wouldn't the To Protect and Serve assurance written on many police units obligate them to do just that?
Yes I know. It was because of marketing.
That slogan is truthful yet deceitful. The ignorant people (most all of them) think this is the LEO pledge to them the people. The truth if you care to see it is that this is their pledge to the state.
Imagine if their super bowl ads ever aired. It’s still bullshit. This is clear.y aimed at fathers and sons not like the bushmaster/rem and man cards and whatever bullshit. This is literally about safety and respect.
To post a pic like that on the internet is just asking to get some man-hating lesbian from CPS and her dog-shooter squad to pay you a visit.
Oh, I agree. However “they” don’t care about that. To them it’s just another piece of the puzzle to push their agenda. Same lawyer that handled the sandy hook case against Rem is the one going after this one too.
We also have the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005.
If they overturn that gun makers CAN be sued for shootings. That’s why it’s there. They can’t be held liable for what someone does with their equipment
It's a big savings to settle much cheaper then going to court for the insurance companies. Its amazing what they pay out on claims without giving it a second thought.
Bad wording I guess.
Correct. It was an insurance settlement.
Pay who a visit?
"Consider your man card reissued." That’s how a 2012 ad from Remington read below the image of the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle. It was featured in Maxim, a magazine whose readership is primarily made up of young impressionable men. The semi-automatic rifle Remington was marketing was similar to the Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle, which Adam Lanza used a few months later to mass murder 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Exactly, I’m thinking maybe somebody at DD should have thought that thru before posting it on May 16. They’ve since deleted it, but not before it was screenshot by many. That pic was in a Nypost article yesterday.
That photo is perfectly fine and what a man with guns in the house should do often with his young children. Why cower to the left. Fuck those mother fuckers.
Hey, you're talking to a Boomer who built wooden 3 gun wall racks in shop class in jr. high like all the other non sissy kids that came from normal families.
Yeah, I pretty much covered that in my first post in this thread above. But, the OP’s post is about a lawsuit. This is basically how they got Remington, thru their interpretation of Rem’s marketing. Same lawyer that handled the sandy hook/Remington deal is the one representing these people. Said he learned a lot in that trial, and would use everything he could against DD. Is it bullshit? Yep, no doubt.
The outcome of Sandy Hook litigation isn’t certain.
Rem settled with 5 families in Feb. for $73 million. I hope wherever this goes that DD stands their ground and fights it all the way and doesn’t settle. At some point in the near future I think we’re all gonna have to stand up.
DD should terminate their .gov contracts forthwith.
I hope so too, if they settle they will start bringing lawsuits against every manufacturer and probably accessories as well. My fear is there are deep pockets behind this filing(Soros ect take your pick). Firearms are the lynchpin to their entire socialist utopia fantasy, until the country is disarmed they can’t fully succeed, and they will throw as many lives in the grinder as needed. Our founders understood this, gave us a foolproof constitution to stop it from happening, and we still let the enemy from within convince 40% of the country that everything that is wrong is right.
Why are you flipping him the bird?Stop,
Don't touch,
Leave the area,
Tell an adult.
This is how you check that the chamber is empty,
Never point it at anything you do not wish to shoot, don't be a Baldwin.
edit to add: The Eddie Eagle refrain also works when they find bad shit on social media. Our school district is all over getting the students to tell a responsible adult about questionable social media goings on.
I don’t even see how any of their advertisements apply. That IG post isn’t an ad. It’s a social media post.
