• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Movie Theater Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

sirhrmechanic

Command Sgt. Major
Full Member
Minuteman
I would rather shave my head with a cheese-grater and chew tinfoil than see this flick... Guess I am not alone. Friend sent me this review from the Matt Walsh Blog. It was worth sharing in case any of you need a reason to tell the wife, GF, etc. that you can't make it...

I hear that the theaters have installed checkpoints where they are collecting Man Cards as you enter...

Cheers,

Sirhr



Les Miserables Taught Me How to Hate Again

Posted on December 28, 2012by themattwalshblog

Last night I went to a showing of Les Miserables. And when I say “went to” I mean “hogtied and dragged at gun point by my wife, her sister and her mom”. By the looks of many of the other men in that crowded overheated theater, I was not the only hostage victim in attendance. In fact I saw one dude commit Hara-kiri while shouting “death before dishonor” in the parking lot prior to the screening. At first I thought he was slightly overreacting. And then the movie started.

I have to say, after watching the entire film, it was actually a thousand times worse than I could have imagined. Les Miserables will stand forever as the most miserable cinematic experience I’ve ever suffered through. And this is coming from a guy who saw “Christmas with the Kranks” in theaters, so that should tell you something.

Let me run through a few points about this excruciating horror show for anyone, especially any man, who has not yet been forced to endure it.

Les Miserables apparently holds the Guinness world record for longest musical about a minor parole violation. It tells the utterly pointless tale of an ex-con as he tries to elude a bumbling parole officer for 20 years. This is also, it should be mentioned, the first film to show two decades pass by in real time. So if you’re heading to the theater tonight make sure to pack a change of clothes. My wife told me afterward that the movie, despite it’s torturous running time, actually CUT OUT several scenes from the original play. Too bad they didn’t cut out more scenes. Like every scene. Of course it didn’t have to be that long. Hugh Jackman, the criminal guy, could have just, you know, MOVED OUT OF THE FREAKING CITY IF HE DIDN’T WANT TO BE CAUGHT. Instead this whole game of cat-and-mouse between Jackman and Russell Crowe takes place in one neighborhood. The dumbest criminal of the millennium vs. a law enforcement officer that makes every Leslie Nielsen character look like Sherlock Holmes in comparison.

Oh. But it gets worse. Much worse. They sing. Dear God do they sing. They sing EVERYTHING. Look, I know it’s a musical. I get it. I’ve seen Fiddler on the Roof and The Sound of Music and West Side Story. They sing in those films/plays also. But then they break up the musical numbers with normal dialogue. But that’s just too simple and not nearly irritating enough, according to the maniac who wrote this tornado of crap. Every single line in the movie is sung. It doesn’t matter how pedestrian the dialogue, they have to put it to music: “Pass the salt”, “Hang on I gotta take a leak”, etc. All put to song. My sister-in-law cried throughout the whole movie. I cried tears of blissful joy when Russell Crowe threw himself off a bridge at the end because it meant he’d finally stop singing. BUT EVEN THAT DIDN’T STOP HIM. All the dead people had to come back before the credits for one last encore. By the way, Crowe, you’re the guy who played the gladiator but now you will live in infamy as the most awkward casting decision in Hollywood history. You reminded me of someone’s dad who was tossed into the school play at the last minute after his son came down with laryngitis on opening night.

But let’s talk about the “big” musical numbers. You don’t need to buy the soundtrack. I’ll sum up every song in the movie. Here you go: “I’m so lonely, I’m so alone, look at me my life is hard, I’m alone, I’m on my own, there’s this empty chair here, it’s empty because I’m alone, I’m lonely, all this bad stuff has happened to me because of my inexcusably stupid life choices, I’m alone, I feel so alone, on my own, on my own, on my own, did I mention I’m on my oooooowwwwwn?”

Not a dry eye in the house after we heard that one. For the 40th time.

Vapid, shallow, predictable, self indulgent and emotionally manipulative. “BUT IT’S A CLASSIC!” No. No it’s not. Who cares if the play has been around for a while? Malaria has been around for a while. Just because something is old doesn’t make it a “classic”.

And I haven’t even mentioned the fact that half the characters in this flick– which is set in France — have an inexplicable limey British chimney sweep accent. That would make sense for Mary Poppins but not this. Incidentally THAT’S a musical I’d sooner watch 5 times in a row before being subjected to another 3 minutes of Les Miserables.

Then, two thirds of the way through the movie, we get the obligatory tragic love story. Here’s how it goes: a young French revolutionary spots a blonde chick across the street. The two lock eyes and literally THAT NIGHT the dumb desperate loser is singing about how he’d “die for her”. Really? And I’m supposed to become psychologically invested in a plot device that has just reduced the beauty, joy, pain and sacrifice of romantic love to something you can catch like a cold or fall into like a puddle? I know Hollywood has been peddling that nonsense for ages but this was simply too much to cope with.

To make matters worse we’re all supposed to be super impressed because the songs (and by “songs” I mean “every single word uttered during the course of the entire picture”) are performed live instead of being recorded in a studio and dubbed into the film. “GEE WOW I’M SO ENAMORED WITH YOUR ARTISTIC INTEGRITY”. Is that the reaction I’m supposed to have? I don’t know because my initial reaction was something like “Man, this sounds awful”. Instead of lip syncing pre-recorded songs, the actors sputtered out of key while choking back tears and gasping for breath. It was like listening to someone sing karaoke while being chased by a swarm of African killer bees. Coincidentally, that is the actual premise of a reality show on TruTV. Except that show likely has more depth and intelligence. I don’t care if the “let’s do it live” move was “revolutionary”. Not all revolutions are good. Just ask France.

I could go on. But I won’t. I hated Les Miserables with a violent passion. Let’s leave it at that.

And at this: my wife now has to watch four mob movies, three war movies and two History Channel documentaries with me.

That’s the exchange rate.

Sorry, honey, I don’t make the rules. But I will enforce them.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

that movie is almost 3 miserable hours.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Sir,

I have to thank you for the most eloquent and entertaining description of a movie that I have ever read. That was a truly entertaining read. And I will heed your advice, too. Thanks for taking one for the team!

And are you sure that the exchange rate will suffice? Sounds like you're gonna need 'compensatory dividends' or something, too.

I'm sure you can think of a few. HA
smile.gif
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Fantastic review, many thanks for helping me dodge a bullet!
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

I saw it with a female but unlike all the other chest-thumpers who claim to have been dragged I went somewhat willingly because I enjoyed the book and previous Liam Neeson version of the movie. However nobody told me it was a goddamn musical.

As far as I'm concerned the only good musical every made was Paint Your Wagon.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BCP</div><div class="ubbcode-body">and previous Liam Neeson version of the movie. However nobody told me it was a goddamn musical.</div></div>

Same. I went thinking that I was going to see a remake of Liam's work.

NO. The movie is a pretentious piece of crap. They deliberately made this movie with this name so people would be afraid to give negative reviews on this movie. I shit you not on this. It's total crap.

It's like someone got the idea on how to make a movie by watching "The Producers."(Yes I did watch it, and the original is fucking funny) Okay next step, pick a name that everyone thinks is a classic, and attach it to this. Next we'll take a bunch of A-list actors, tell them that this will be great for their careers, and make them sing. Yes, THEY MAKE ACTORS SING IN THIS CRAP. Guess how that goes? Like doing a off road rally with grandma's station wagon. It doesn't fit, at all.

Whoever created this garbage had too much optimism to see that it was a walking pantload, just in concept alone.

I seriously can't find anything good about this movie. I didn't pay a thing for the ticket(reward offers are wonderful sometimes), but I'm thinking that I should have been paid in some sort of compensation for this. I actually serious about this part.

3 hours of torture. Not as comparable to watching The Ring 1 and 2, back to back, but damn close.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Can't say I've seen this movie however the Oprea itself is extremely impressive.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Reviews like this are why I rarely go see movies of books I've read. Hugo alternates chapters between French countryside bullshit and the actual plot of the book, so half the book was painful to read, but the other half was pretty good.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Meh, its isnt that bad. As well as it recounts the French revolution during a time when men stood against nearly pointless odds to proclaim and retake their freedom at the cost of their own lives. It brings to light the perspective of the oppressors is not to be evil, they think they are doing right to the best of their ability and do not realize the tyranny they wield and bring forth on the people they govern.

I personally think it may just be something the generation of today should see as much of as we can possibly throw at them. No offense to the musical haters, but this film had more balls and real men in it than anything I have seen in a movie theater recently. Fuck spiderman and the x-men, its all fake and fantasy BS. The men who fought the french revolution starving, under armed and undermanned were true heroes of breed we have not seen in quite a while. I will gladly sit and listen to their story, even if they are singing it at me. . .. for 3 damn hours.

I agree that I could have done with less of the country side love story, but that was a part of it. The scene where Javert places the medal from his chest on the young rebel boy's corpse, recognizing his courage even as an enemy, would probably make most of the grown ass men I know squirm in their seats to keep their composure.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BCP</div><div class="ubbcode-body">However nobody told me it was a goddamn musical.
</div></div>

LMFAO! That's some funny stuff right there.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

Nominated for <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="text-decoration: underline">8 Academy Awards</span></span>.

I shit you not. <span style="font-style: italic">"The horror, the horror"</span>.
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sirhrmechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So was Yentl. Just 'sayin.

Cheers,

Sirhr </div></div>

LOL! Yentl, there is one from the vault!
 
Re: Les Miserables -- one viewer's take on it

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sirhrmechanic</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So was Yentl. Just 'sayin.

Cheers,

Sirhr </div></div>

I didn't mean it in a good way. LOL.