Some time around 1997 I put a few rounds through my buddy's 1903A3, I think we had a milk jug at 300 yards and I was shocked when I hit it on the first shot. That made an impression on me. I've thought about them from time to time since then, but when I wanted to buy vintage I went with the cheaper K31 and Mosin.
I saw a consignment yesterday at my LGS, asking $700 and I thought "I've been thinking about these for almost 20 years I should either get one or not."
I just don't know anything about what to watch out for. Totally clueless about these rifles. Seems like there are fakes, mods, restorations etc that can shift the value a lot. Aim Surplus has refurbs for 795 but with a new barrel is it still vintage? I'm not looking to have a certificate of authenticity framed on the wall below it, just want something I can pass on to my kid but if I'm going to start upgrading with new parts I can get a Remington 700 that's lighter and shoots better for $500. Or am I missing the point? Are people okay with replicas just to preserve the look and feel of an old classic?
Barrel is marked 43 and the serial number 390XXXX seems to be from around the same time from what I find online. The rifle looks good to me but I don't know what it's supposed to look like. Maybe a little too good for 70 years old, I'm nowhere near that and I look like hell.
If I get one I just want to pay a fair price and have it hold its value. I'd like it to shoot reasonably well, whatever that means for these rifles, but I won't be competing with it. Hitting a milk jug at 300 with an awesome piece of American history would be cool.
Thanks for any advice or insight you guys have.
I saw a consignment yesterday at my LGS, asking $700 and I thought "I've been thinking about these for almost 20 years I should either get one or not."
I just don't know anything about what to watch out for. Totally clueless about these rifles. Seems like there are fakes, mods, restorations etc that can shift the value a lot. Aim Surplus has refurbs for 795 but with a new barrel is it still vintage? I'm not looking to have a certificate of authenticity framed on the wall below it, just want something I can pass on to my kid but if I'm going to start upgrading with new parts I can get a Remington 700 that's lighter and shoots better for $500. Or am I missing the point? Are people okay with replicas just to preserve the look and feel of an old classic?
Barrel is marked 43 and the serial number 390XXXX seems to be from around the same time from what I find online. The rifle looks good to me but I don't know what it's supposed to look like. Maybe a little too good for 70 years old, I'm nowhere near that and I look like hell.
If I get one I just want to pay a fair price and have it hold its value. I'd like it to shoot reasonably well, whatever that means for these rifles, but I won't be competing with it. Hitting a milk jug at 300 with an awesome piece of American history would be cool.
Thanks for any advice or insight you guys have.