It was very well built. The reticle is what I didn’t like. If it had better wind holds inside the 2mil circle I would have kept it. It’s great for hunting.
It was, it’s well thought out. He designed it to be useful at lower power and still be able to shoot long range with it.
At low power with illumination, it was very nice.
He called it a cross over reticle for hunting and tac shooting. It’s serves both purposes very well. I needed a better wind hold near the crosshair for the particular rifle I was putting it on.
I contacted meopta about switching reticles to the other mrad reticle that they offer, the said they don’t do that at this time. If they would have, I would have kept it.
At low power with illumination, it was very nice.
He called it a cross over reticle for hunting and tac shooting. It’s serves both purposes very well. I needed a better wind hold near the crosshair for the particular rifle I was putting it on.
I contacted meopta about switching reticles to the other mrad reticle that they offer, the said they don’t do that at this time. If they would have, I would have kept it.
I just checked out the video, that’s the reticle I was hoping they would switch it to.
^^^^^ exactly what i ran into!
great scope, i love mine.
its not perfect for wind holds.
So what is the difference in name for these two reticles? Both MRAD?
Thank You! Not sure why I was having a problem locating that on the website.MRAD vs. MRAD1
Meopta Sports Optics - European premium optics
www.meoptasportsoptics.com
