• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Mexican Senate President Floats a Plan to Annex Part of United States as Illegal Aliens Continue to Cause Mayhem in LA

PatMiles

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 25, 2017
1,689
4,790

One of the most powerful leaders in Mexico is floating a plan for his country to seize a large chunk of the United States’ land as the riots in Los Angeles continue to rage.

Senator Gerardo Fernández Noroña, the President of the Mexican Senate, responded to mayhem on Monday by promoting La Reconquista, a radical idea supported by individuals who want the American Southwest returned to Mexico. In his remarks to reporters in Mexico City, he revealed that he once told Trump he supported building and paying for a wall if it included the U.S. territories that were once part of Mexico.

“I was at Trump Tower when President-Elect Donald Trump was days away from taking the oath of office for the first time as President,” said Fernández Noroña. “I said ‘yes, we’ll build the wall, yes, we’ll pay for it, but we’ll do it according to the map of Mexico from 1830.”

Fernández Noroña then held up the 1830 map, which shows the states of California, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and more as part of Mexico.

“If you can see, maybe a third or at least a quarter of the North American territory was part of Mexico until 1846,” he explained. “We were stripped of these territories.”

“We were settled there before the nation now known as the United States,” Fernández Noroña added. “The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo establishes rights for the people who were settled in those territories, which were not respected.”

After blabbering about the American city of Laredo and the Mexican city of Nuevo Laredo, the Mexican Senate President returned to Los Angeles.

“With this geography, how can we talk about liberating Los Angeles and California?” Fernández Noroña asked while holding up another map showing the American Southwest as part of Mexico. “Liberate them from who? The Mexicans who are settled in that place are settled in what has been their homeland.”

“The two names don’t deceive, the most spoken language in Los Angeles is Spanish,” he said with a smirk. “You don’t need to speak English to live in Los Angeles.”
“The United States government has the right to implement whatever immigration measures it deems appropriate, certainly,” Fernández Noroña added. “But they have no right to violate the dignity of migrants. They have no right to separate families.”

These remarks come just two days after Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum egged on the violent protesters and lashing out at the Trump Administration for even trying to lay down the law. During a speech in Mexico City, Sheinbaum hailed the rioters as “good men and women” who just want to support their families.

She also threatened another insurrection when she called for Mexicans in America to mobilize and take action if the U.S. decides to implement a tax on money sent home to Mexico. Remittances make up roughly 4% of Mexico’s gross domestic product.

Perhaps Mexico’s top leaders will change their tune if Trump raises tariffs on their country again and cuts off foreign aid.


HILARIOUS!!
 
I hope they try because it would be war, then Trump could suspend Habeas to make deportations much easier and faster. Trump would probably offer tourist packages to American Citizens in which we'd get food, lodging, ammo, at the Southern Border and the trigger time we all want against the invaders, cartel members, and their enablers!
 

One of the most powerful leaders in Mexico is floating a plan for his country to seize a large chunk of the United States’ land as the riots in Los Angeles continue to rage.

Senator Gerardo Fernández Noroña, the President of the Mexican Senate, responded to mayhem on Monday by promoting La Reconquista, a radical idea supported by individuals who want the American Southwest returned to Mexico. In his remarks to reporters in Mexico City, he revealed that he once told Trump he supported building and paying for a wall if it included the U.S. territories that were once part of Mexico.

“I was at Trump Tower when President-Elect Donald Trump was days away from taking the oath of office for the first time as President,” said Fernández Noroña. “I said ‘yes, we’ll build the wall, yes, we’ll pay for it, but we’ll do it according to the map of Mexico from 1830.”

Fernández Noroña then held up the 1830 map, which shows the states of California, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and more as part of Mexico.

“If you can see, maybe a third or at least a quarter of the North American territory was part of Mexico until 1846,” he explained. “We were stripped of these territories.”

“We were settled there before the nation now known as the United States,” Fernández Noroña added. “The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo establishes rights for the people who were settled in those territories, which were not respected.”

After blabbering about the American city of Laredo and the Mexican city of Nuevo Laredo, the Mexican Senate President returned to Los Angeles.

“With this geography, how can we talk about liberating Los Angeles and California?” Fernández Noroña asked while holding up another map showing the American Southwest as part of Mexico. “Liberate them from who? The Mexicans who are settled in that place are settled in what has been their homeland.”

“The two names don’t deceive, the most spoken language in Los Angeles is Spanish,” he said with a smirk. “You don’t need to speak English to live in Los Angeles.”
“The United States government has the right to implement whatever immigration measures it deems appropriate, certainly,” Fernández Noroña added. “But they have no right to violate the dignity of migrants. They have no right to separate families.”

These remarks come just two days after Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum egged on the violent protesters and lashing out at the Trump Administration for even trying to lay down the law. During a speech in Mexico City, Sheinbaum hailed the rioters as “good men and women” who just want to support their families.

She also threatened another insurrection when she called for Mexicans in America to mobilize and take action if the U.S. decides to implement a tax on money sent home to Mexico. Remittances make up roughly 4% of Mexico’s gross domestic product.

Perhaps Mexico’s top leaders will change their tune if Trump raises tariffs on their country again and cuts off foreign aid.


HILARIOUS!!
Tell him to start with Bama, we are bored as fuck.
 
idiot-loser.gif
 
Laughs in history.....

If you ever really dig into the battles, they were all small, mostly skirmishes, but any time the Mexicans had less than a 10 to 1 advantage, they were routed. We could defeat the entire Mexican military with a combat division in a weekend.

However, if we could use this as an opportunity to expand America south a few lat lines, then let's get this party started. Lot's of oil and gas just south of the border.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250611_145346_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20250611_145346_Chrome.jpg
    471.8 KB · Views: 42
Is your Afrikan pilgrimage on hold?
Postponed. Have some “paperwork” (translated “Bribe”) issues. Had a great relationship with the previous (Christian) dude, but he up and died on me. Then his replacement rode in, saw a Mzungu (white foreigner), got dollar signs in his eyes, and forced us to restart the entire process from scratch, even though we were 90% done. 🤮
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Yasherka
What Mexican politicians should be doing is making a deal with USA and Trump. Mexico helps stop the flow of illegals headed to the border and the US has full ability to go after and destroy the drug cartels since cartels are a clear and present danger to both countries. Besides drugs aren't they doing human trafficking and other deplorable illegal acts too ? Betting most of the Mexican politicians are on the cartels payroll .
 
They want us to give it back. I think they would have had to given it to us for us to give it back. We bought it. I could see selling it, but it's not going to be at the same rate as some indian infested wilderness with little to no infrastructure. In other words, essay, you can't afford it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r
What Mexican politicians should be doing is making a deal with USA and Trump. Mexico helps stop the flow of illegals headed to the border and the US has full ability to go after and destroy the drug cartels since cartels are a clear and present danger to both countries. Besides drugs aren't they doing human trafficking and other deplorable illegal acts too ? Betting most of the Mexican politicians are on the cartels payroll .
Why would the Mexican govt. Agree to let the US attack the drug cartels? Dope and these complicated devices (stolen intellectual propert from the chinks) are the national economy?
Screenshot_20250612_060626_Chrome.jpg
 
The truth is that they couldn't occupy it. What is now Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, California, etc. was uninhabited by Mexicans when Europeans began moving into the area. The commanche and apache would kill Mexican soldiers with rocks for sport. They would slaughter them any time they found them. They killed anyone who encrouched. Once the Americans got it under control, then they wanted to try to take it from them, claiming it was theirs all along, so they tried, but the only fight they ever won was about the 5th battle of the Alamo (the famous battle), and they had something crazy like 75 to 1 odds.
 
Fuck it . Give em Cornholfornia .
Wall it up . Nothing in and nothing out . 3Mule wide exclusion zone on their side . Anything trying to enter it becomes pink must .
Join me for more International policy hacks 😎.
A version of this could be negotiated like a 100 miles of south kali BUT they get all the hoodrat gang banging thugs of all colors no matter what flag they fly or language the babble .
 
The truth is that they couldn't occupy it. What is now Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, California, etc. was uninhabited by Mexicans when Europeans began moving into the area. The commanche and apache would kill Mexican soldiers with rocks for sport. They would slaughter them any time they found them. They killed anyone who encrouched. Once the Americans got it under control, then they wanted to try to take it from them, claiming it was theirs all along, so they tried, but the only fight they ever won was about the 5th battle of the Alamo (the famous battle), and they had something crazy like 75 to 1 odds.
There is a lot of untold history from that era. Some of the missions and stuff say they were occupying areas that supposedly only had exploratory expeditions go through. They were slaughtered and robbed in a handful of native rebellions. Oh to be a fly on the wall of untold history. 🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hecouldgoalltheway
Sam Huston should have whipped out Santa Anna's army when he had the chance at San Jacinto then hung the prick. Sam had a lot of Mexican support at the time. some were killed at the Alamo and Goliad. should have kept going south and grabbed a lot more. likely could have taken over peacefully,sorta. Mexican war,border shit a la Pancho,illegal immigration could have been avoided maybe. Huston's wife was Mexican. Mexican people were getting abused by Santa Anna before and after the Texas war. they could likely have been attached to us peacefully and been happy and better off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoDopes
actually a bit of truth there. Kaiser Bill started a plan to use Mexico and Mexicans as an invasion op. in 1915?-don't remember. actually the only possible reason for us to get into ww1. i need to look it up. don't remember the time line real well.
The Mexicans were neutral because of their ongoing revolution. Hard to say if this was real or false flag to pull us in to the war:

 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Eunozs
The Mexicans were neutral because of their ongoing revolution. Hard to say if this was real or false flag to pull us in to the war:

agree. my memory of the story is hazy. it is an interesting one. i vaguely remember something about a fake message or something. i may have that confused with the Dreyfus affair. oldishness is not memory enhancing.