• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Mike Rowe on the News

Tucker301

Groundskeeper
Banned !
Feb 13, 2015
9,494
23,357
Southern VA
My wife and I were just discussing this the other night.
Depending on which sources you use for information, your perspective and knowledge of current events can be vastly different.
News isn't supposed to do that. News is supposed to tell you facts and then let your draw your own conclusions, but changing the channel these days is like going to an alternate universe.
Mike Rowe
20 hrs ·

So I’m flicking around, searching for enlightenment - you know, like a good citizen - when I learn that CNN is still “the most trusted name in news.” I notice this, because they tell me so every ten minutes. This is comforting. I think it’s important that journalists be trusted.

Meanwhile, over at FOX, I am assured that everything is still “fair and balanced.” I know this, because they tell me so every ten minutes. This is comforting. I believe it’s important for journalists to be fair and balanced. Unfortunately, neither FOX nor CNN seem to believe anything the other is saying.

Right now, CNN is telling me the “Susan Rice Scandal,” is completely fake, and being perpetuated by the partisans over at FOX. At the same time, FOX is explaining that the “Russian Conspiracy” is completely fake, and being driven by the partisans over at CNN. (Judge Jeanine was trying to walk me through it a few moments ago, but sadly, her head exploded.)

So I flick back over to CNN, where Don Lemmon is promising not to insult my intelligence by reporting on Susan Rice, until there's something resembling proof. But over on NBC, Susan Rice just told me she “didn’t leak nothing to nobody.” Isn’t that like saying there’s nobody she didn’t leak nothing to?

Look - I have no wish to insult Don’s intelligence, or Susan's, or the people at Harvard, who no doubt cautioned her about the perils of double-negatives. But if The Ambassador did not in fact, "leak nothing to nobody," wouldn't that suggest she leaked "something to everyone?"

Back on FOX, Bill O’Reilly seems to agree with that assessment, but The Washington Post has told me that Bill can no longer be trusted, because he said Maxine Waters wears a wig she stole from James Brown. Wait. What?

Honestly, I’ve never seen anything like it. All the anchors have that same bulging vein in their forehead. The same piece of spittle forming in the corners of their mouth. Everyone seems determined to make absolutely sure I completely understand that NOBODY has a shred of evidence to substantiate ANYTHING. Which begs the question - what if they all succeed?

Psst… Wanna see something real?

Watch the Season Finale of Bering Sea Gold on Discovery. It’s on tonight at 10pm Eastern, and its audience has nearly doubled in size this year. Why? I mean, aside from the amazing narrator? Maybe, it’s because people are so sick of fake news, it’s a relief to see real people sucking up real gold underneath the real ice off the coast of a very real place, called Nome, Alaska.

Or, if you know how to program your fake DVR, you might want to record Season 13 of Deadliest Catch, this coming Tuesday. That’s right – Season 13. You want to know why Deadliest Catch has been on 13 years? I mean, aside from it’s amazing narrator? It’s because you can’t give talking points to ice. And you can’t script The Bering Sea.

Oh look! Back on Tucker Carlson, I see Elizabeth Warren and Rachel Dolezal - A "fake Indian" and a "fake black woman." I wonder what they’re up to? I bet they would enjoy a few weeks on a crab boat, surrounded by reality, 275 miles northwest of Dutch Harbor...

Hell, I’d watch that!

Mike

PS If you can’t take another second of this, there’s a fantastic podcast with an amazing narrator that tells 5-minute true stories. According to unnamed sources, Susan Rice has called them “the most unfakeist stuff that's never not been unlistened to.” The newest one is here…mikerowe.com/podcast.
 
What gets me is for how long CNN and like minded types were saying that Trump's claim that he was being spied on was completely false and absurd. Now the headline everyday is: Trump was being spied on but his claim that it was done illegally is false. So which is it?? It takes a lot of lies to cover up for the initial lie
 
It used to be that I would check out the different channels to try and find a middle ground resembling reality, but now the players are so far gone in their spinning that there is almost no way to garner the truth out of the smoke screens, red herrings and outright lies. Mike Rowe has nailed this one.
 
You know, I really can't blame any of he "fake news" spewers because they're in just for the money and the viewers and NOT actual news. Know who I blame? I blame modern society. I swear it's literally like we have all become like a classroom of 8 year old kids all with full blown ADD. We can't just concentrate on something unless it's all flashy and entertaining. When the fuck did it happen where news shows had to be entertaining? 50+ years or so ago there was literally just one news on a choice of 7 channels. I've seen clips of them old news shows and there was no form of entertainment at all in them. Just actual news. Did people complain? Did the news company stop making money and start losing viewers? So I ask again when did it happen that we became people with such a lack of attention span that we can't just watch the fucking news and get informed without some jaskass in a suit and tie or some skank dressed like a whore making fools out of themselves just for ratings?
 
You know, I really can't blame any of he "fake news" spewers because they're in just for the money and the viewers and NOT actual news. Know who I blame? I blame modern society. I swear it's literally like we have all become like a classroom of 8 year old kids all with full blown ADD. We can't just concentrate on something unless it's all flashy and entertaining. When the fuck did it happen where news shows had to be entertaining? 50+ years or so ago there was literally just one news on a choice of 7 channels. I've seen clips of them old news shows and there was no form of entertainment at all in them. Just actual news. Did people complain? Did the news company stop making money and start losing viewers? So I ask again when did it happen that we became people with such a lack of attention span that we can't just watch the fucking news and get informed without some jaskass in a suit and tie or some skank dressed like a whore making fools out of themselves just for ratings?

Your point is valid. The question is rhetorical. I agree.
 
a great role model and a man's man!

As a younger man I was pretty proud that I was always willing to do the shittiest job on a crew, even if I wasn't my place to do so. UNTIL I watched "Dirty Jobs" and found myself saying "no fucking way" almost every episode. I've got mad respect for that guy, and not once have I seen him act in a way that's led me to believe that he isn't the genuinely nice guy he's shown to be.
 
Maser. Fifty years ago? Seven channels? That's four more than I remember. That must have been in the big city.
 
Maser. Fifty years ago? Seven channels? That's four more than I remember. That must have been in the big city.

I was thinking the same thing, although most days you were doing well to get decent reception on 2/3. On great days when you held your tongue just right we could get an "extra" channel: PBS on the UHF knob or whichever it was.
 
60 years ago (I was 9) we had 5 stations, but TV was not even in the running with Hunting/Fishing/Trapping/Tanning . When Annette joined the mouse club I was all about that. That was the only show I watch each time it was on as a young-en. Only when I left uncle the first time in 67 did I watch much of anything until the wife passed away in 2013, then I had it removed. TV = total brain washing/look at me, save very few shows I ever seen. Mike Rowe's shows are about as best TV ever got for me, yet I don't miss any of it.
 
Haha. I'd forgotten about the UHF knob. Thanks for the memories.
 
UHF was the shit. It was the only way we could get Monty Python's Flying Circus, and everyone had to stand a certain spot in my brother's bedroom or it all went to shit.
 
Don't have tv in the true sense, just a smart tv I use to watch Netflix. I do make it a point to check MSN every day, though. Fox might be a little out there, but I can't imagine a single network can match the full on crazy we're seeing from the rest of the mainstream media in terms of volume of shit produced.

The left bought their own bullshit. They equate political power with the power to engineer a society that perfectly suits them and their beliefs. Stupid fuckers can't seem to figure out that we don't see it the same way. The oppression they're waiting for just isn't going to happen and the media and the upper crust of the left know it. They see long term political defeat coming. That's my take.
 
Haha. I'd forgotten about the UHF knob. Thanks for the memories.

I remember as a kid we had an old CRT TV from like the late 70s and it had both VHF and UHF knobs. Being that the signal to it was analog, it was fun to spin the UHF knob as fast as you could because there was no pause in between channels like there is when you change the channel of a digital signal. Yeah I know I was an odd kid. ;)
 
60 years ago (I was 9) we had 5 stations, but TV was not even in the running with Hunting/Fishing/Trapping/Tanning . When Annette joined the mouse club I was all about that. That was the only show I watch each time it was on as a young-en. Only when I left uncle the first time in 67 did I watch much of anything until the wife passed away in 2013, then I had it removed. TV = total brain washing/look at me, save very few shows I ever seen. Mike Rowe's shows are about as best TV ever got for me, yet I don't miss any of it.

I remember the first time I noticed Annette's boobs were bigger than her mouse ears
 
Maser to answer your question. It all started with cable. 40 years ago 3-4 channels all had news on at the same time. So everyone had to stomach thru the news. Now there are a shit ton of choices and if the news is boring the choice to watch about 300 other things exists. Ultimately they have to do something to attract viewers to justify add revenue.

Iam not sure if the news caused it or is a by product of it but the same situation has happened to our political system. No middle of the road just extremes on both sides.
 
Maser to answer your question. It all started with cable. 40 years ago 3-4 channels all had news on at the same time. So everyone had to stomach thru the news
Ours had a off knob an we used it. Then again we were always busy with a garden/canning, traps & snare lines to run, fish traps to tend plus hides/pelts to tan. TV was for when bad weather came calling or you were sick/injured. Well except for titty girl on mouse club, LOL. TV was but a novelty in many house holds, until the V/N war came along. Then things started snowballing down hill. Trash became the norm, then everyone tried to one up their competitor, by adding to the/a story in ways that were out right lies. Now many are living the seeds they thought were so cool long ago. Interesting how so many are in debt to their eye balls and live check to check, because of want's.

 
UHF was the shit. It was the only way we could get Monty Python's Flying Circus, and everyone had to stand a certain spot in my brother's bedroom or it all went to shit.

my family had money............we had remote control needlenose pliers.............
 
WARNING - Zombie thread alert!!!!!!!!!!

Given the recent quest in the Bear Pit to find truth in/on the Ether, Mike Rowe MUST bubble to the top...