Re: Moly coated ? And why?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RWG818</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Is there any pro to going with moly coated bullets. I have always shot smk's non moly. Have heard some swear by the moly coated bullets. Is the cleaning much worse, and is the any advantage to them? </div></div>
Moly vs. non-moly is like 9mm vs. 45acp, or Notre Dame football, you're either a fan, or you believe they're the devil.
I have the Lyman moly kit and have some factory moly bullets that I shoot here and there, so while I use moly, it's not something I swear by.
You will get slightly lower pressures with moly, a high pressure (400k PSI lubricant) and will need to bump up your loads for non-moly bullets, a grain to achieve roughly the same velocity.
Benchrest shooters feel that they can shoot longer strings between cleanings, with moly bullets.
In the early days of moly, many used the coffee can and BBs method to attempt to pound the moly into the jacket surface pores and that method left a lot of moly clumped onto the surface. This clumped on moly usually deposited itself into the first inch, or two, of the barrel yielding the dreaded 'black moly ring' just past the throat. This would build up, much like a carbon ring which can form and lead to higher pressures.
Moly can, in some circumstances, trap moisture against the barrel steel and cause pitting and/or corrosion, but I think this is probably overblown these days. You're not getting much moly coating on a bore by firing a few bullets.
Many feel that if you're going to shoot them, shoot only moly bullets and don't go back to nakeds, but I don't know if this is scientifically proven, to cause problems.
Moly can be removed by stuff like USP, or JB's Bore Paste, so it's not a big issue, removing it if you're judicious in your application of the paste, which is an abbrasive.
Modern moly bullets are not clumpy, so the black ring shouldn't be an issue any longer.
Ultimately, it's up to you.
Chris