Sidearms & Scatterguns My Glock Journey: There and Back Again

Centuriator

Dude...you're being very un-Dude.
Banned !
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 3, 2012
2,798
1,631
Middle 'Merica!
I wrote this for THE TRUTH ABOUT GUNS, and after taking my new Glock 34 out yesterday for its first outing, I can't tell you how pleased I am with it. For whatever reason, the trigger feels really good on this G34. It was made just last month, the casing in the little envelope is dated 3/20/14. The trigger reset point is superb and heck, I even shot it well with stock sights. I just love the G34, the long sight radius is superb for me. I had laser surgery and so my dominant eye is also my distance eye and that sight radius get it out in front of me just far enough that I can really focus on that front post. I put Arredondo mag extensions on it with Wolff power springs and it performed absolutely flawlessly with no dreaded "brass in the face" issues either and it was dead on accurate, as accurate as I could be with it, it just made me VERY happy to be "back home again" with Glock.

My GLOCK Journey: There and Back Again

A number of years ago when I got into shooting in a major way, I was eager to run out and get my first handgun. I had spent a good bit of time shooting long guns earlier, but never a handgun. Without much thought, I bought a used GLOCK 22. I loaded up the G22 and blazed away at a torso-sized target at about 20 feet. I think I may have even hit it a few times. Maybe . . .

Since then I’ve moved from handgun models to handgun models: SIG, HK, Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Remington, FN, probably others, and I’ve purchased and used striker-fired and DA/SA semi-autos. I’ve given them all a decent workout at the gun club and at the range and training center I frequent. Revolvers too.

So here is my true confession: I’ve been there with GLOCKs, left and now I’m back again. I’ve come full circle back to where I started. Why?

First, for me, the GLOCK just works. I have owned and used a G26, G17, G21, G22, G30, G34, and a G20. I’ve been there and done that with all of them — Gen 3s and Gen 4s — and I’ve had no issues with any of them. Did I just “luck out” or could it be since there are a bazillion GLOCKs out there, the incidents reported on gun forums are unrepresentative? Who knows? All I know is that they have always worked for me.

Second, the trigger. Yes, you read that right, the trigger. I spent so much time learning how to shoot GLOCKs relatively effectively that I grew used to that mushy bangswitch and learned to master the reset point. I have dropped trigger upgrades into a few of my GLOCKs. I like them and they’re nice, but I’m not sure they did me much good.

I thought I would prefer the DA/SA trigger system, hammer systems, etc. They’re good, but ultimately not that big a deal either for me. I realized I really hate the DA-then-SA function of the HKs and SIGs. Frankly, when I want to enjoy a truly great trigger, I pull out my 1911 with its custom trigger set at 2.5 pounds.

Third, I like the feel of the GLOCK. I know that for many the GLOCK is a “brick,” a “plastic monstrosity” and a “piece of junk.” Blah, blah and…more blah. For me, with my monster-sized hands, the GLOCK feels very comfortable. The grip is just fine and I really like the Gen 4 beavertail options that now are standard on GLOCKs.

Fourth, there’s the simplicity of the GLOCK. Chiefly I’ve come to realize that I dislike external safeties. Hate ‘em. I like the “instant-on” of the GLOCK manual of arms. Round chambered…holstered…unholster…fire. No safety to mess with or remember to disengage, nothing to interfere with the function of the handgun. Same trigger pull regardless of first or last shot. Just grab it and pull the trigger. I know this has been one of the chief criticisms of the GLOCK — too easy to have a negligent discharge. Yes, one must be super-aware of the basic laws of safety with a GLOCK as there’s no heavy trigger pull on the first shot as on most DA/SAs.

Fifth, there’s the return on investment. A GLOCK is significantly less expensive than the (ridiculously overpriced) HKs, and nearly anything else. I’d rather spend my “extra” money on accessories and ammo and…you name it. Sure, it’s cool to use the higher priced handguns. I’ve had a HK MK23, a HK USP 9mm Expert, a HK45 and a FNX 45 and 9mm, etc. But was I achieving better results with any of them to justify, for me, the extra $500 bucks required by a HK, or the several hundred more for an FN? Nope.

Sixth, the reality check: Handguns are just fun to shoot. They are. Remember what “fun” is? Sure you do. The oh-so-serious crowd scoffs at the thought, but come on, you know it’s fun to shoot all kinds of handguns. At the end of the day, though, a handgun is still a tool. If you’re able to get rounds into the center mass area of a target consistently at 21 feet, that’s good enough. Sure, you may not be able to take your handgun out to the gun club and punch small groups in paper from 25 yards with your GLOCK (though some of you probably do), but I can get off double taps all day long in various drills with plenty of accuracy with mine.

So after my wandering, I find that I’ve returned to the GLOCK as my go-to handgun platform. The G26 is and has been my primary EDC for quite some time. The G34 is my main training handgun — I love the long sight radius on that thing. They say confession is good for the soul, so there you have it: my GLOCK true confession, there and back again.
 
I realized I really hate the DA-then-SA function of the HKs and SIGs.

Unlike the Glocks, the HKs have a whole range of trigger systems available.
What you probably needed was a P30 Light LEM with the short reset travel package, or the same thing in a P30L if you want a long sight radius.
 
HK's are overpriced and I see no point in buying HK's attempt to imitate a Glock.

:)



Glock & HK both make excellent handguns but I would definitely give the edge in performance , features and strength to HK. HK has been torture tested to no limits and still makes some of the toughest handguns available.
I carry a Glock 30 & a HK compact both in .45 depending on which one I feel like packing. The HK has far more carry mode options as well as triggers and a huge advantage in case of a misfire you simple pull the trigger again unlike strike fired pistols that need two hands to clear it. HK has never been a gun for the masses based on cost where as the Glock is the AK of the handgun world and everyone has a couple.

If you want or like cheap buy a Glock, if you want trigger and mode of carry options and a non-striker pistol tough as nails buy an HK.

Glock shaking on ignition~


guns - Jiffier gifs through HTML5 Video Conversion.
 
in case of a misfire you simple pull the trigger again unlike strike fired pistols that need two hands to clear it.

I'm unaware of any reputable firearm instructor who would recommend simply pulling the trigger again on a misfire.

You should tap, rack, and keep on rocking, not pull the trigger back and try it again.
 
I'm unaware of any reputable firearm instructor who would recommend simply pulling the trigger again on a misfire.

You should tap, rack, and keep on rocking, not pull the trigger back and try it again.



Your words and assumptions, not mine.


Carry gun and self defense I would pull the trigger again before clearing ( becasue I can ) and I favor the HK in this regard as I said before.
Range conditions standard wait & clear apply.

Glad you have never fired a gun with hard primers becasue a DA firearm helps ignition.
 
I too just bought a new 34 and the trigger is at least as good as my other G34 with a ZEV trigger in it. I shoot 3gun with a bunch that shoot 2011s and they no doubt have a better trigger but not $2000 better. Most of the guys that out shoot me with a pistol are shooting Glocks. I think most of the Tupperware guns are great but Glocks run all the time and they're cheap. Very modular and easy to upgrade. Trigger is all about what you get used to. There's a reason why so many trust their life to a Glock.
 
Can you refer me to any manual of arms with a semi-auto that recommends not tapping and racking, but rather pulling the trigger back? In a high stress situation you are counting on fine motor skills. I think it is an extremely bad idea, and quite deadly.

Further, I've shot all kinds of ammo through Glocks over the years, well over 15,000 rounds and in not one single instance have I had a misfire from commercial ammo, ranging from steel case to more expensive brass.
 
Tap / rack / bang is the standard drill used and pretty fool proof. I mentioned pulling the trigger a 2nd time because I can do it far faster and easier than TRB and it's my personal view.

I have had misfires in various calibers in different platforms over the years and mainly with .22 rimfire which is why it's not the best self defense round of choice but better than nothing.
Of the misfires I have encountered a 2nd strike caused ignition on most all that I have encountered. Since I practice a double tap I almost automatically pull the trigger twice anyway.
 
To me HKs and Glocks are the toughest handguns on the planet.....I love them both...bought an HK before ever even looking at a Glock .....but I have to admit....I sold that HK to buy a Glock and a set of Oakleys....and a case of 9mm....but this was 6-7 years ago.....Glocks rock. HKs kick ass....but need to stay in the safe. I own 4 Glocks now...all but one of them beat to hell. They do their jobs, when I feed them they go bang every time. My HK did too for 6500+ rnds but after $700 in upgrades I didnt want to take it out of the safe...so swaped it for a workhorse Glock and havent been happier.