I recently grabbed a 700 in .308 and have been trying to learn to shoot well. The range I shoot at only has 500m capability.
It seemed to be very cost effective to think about shooting .223 instead of .308. I can get .223 brass all day long for free, never having to buy it again. Reloading costs seem like they'd be less than half of what .308 would cost (free brass adds a lot of savings).
My thinking is that this would allow me to shoot much more. Within a few thousand rounds, it looks like I'd could save enough money to buy a larger caliber rifle then (or just shoot twice as much ammo).
Am I really going to be loosing much in selecting .223 over .308 for learning to shoot precision rifles within about 500m?
Or should I stick with .308 and just shoot it less? This is not a hunting or duty weapon, nor am I going to be attending any matches with it until I know what I'm doing.
Thanks again!
It seemed to be very cost effective to think about shooting .223 instead of .308. I can get .223 brass all day long for free, never having to buy it again. Reloading costs seem like they'd be less than half of what .308 would cost (free brass adds a lot of savings).
My thinking is that this would allow me to shoot much more. Within a few thousand rounds, it looks like I'd could save enough money to buy a larger caliber rifle then (or just shoot twice as much ammo).
Am I really going to be loosing much in selecting .223 over .308 for learning to shoot precision rifles within about 500m?
Or should I stick with .308 and just shoot it less? This is not a hunting or duty weapon, nor am I going to be attending any matches with it until I know what I'm doing.
Thanks again!