What am I losing or gaining in choosing one over the other for Rimfire? The reticle would be Mil XT.
- Thread starter Army of One
- Start date
IMO. lil’bit of eye relief and DOF with the 2.5-20. Wanted to like the 2.5. Not so much. Got few of the 4x’s. I’m happy with them for the price point.
I was disappointed in the 2.5-20× for rimfire. I put it on an AR and got the 4-32x for my B14R.
My son has the 4-32 on his rimx and loves it, great for prs and our monthly rimfire f-class. The higher magnification comes into play looking at .22 holes at 100y.
Mike
Mike
Get the 4-32, much better than the 2-20 in terms of eye box and usefulness. I normally use between 15-20 for most match settings which opens both the eye box And FOV. it’s really nice to have high/low magnification options available for some match stages. I was pretty disappointed with the 2-20 comparing it side by side with the 4-32 when shopping at MHSA as they let you take scopes outside for comparison.
vudoo V22 in AG Composites CF stock with NF 4-32 on 40 moa base
vudoo V22 in AG Composites CF stock with NF 4-32 on 40 moa base
I'm also all in with the 4-32x for the same reasons already listed.
How much elevation travel are you guys getting with 30 moa bases? I just purchase one of these for my CZ457 and am curious how much I will have available. Its Mil-XT so if necessary I can hold the difference, farthest I'll be shooting is 350-425 yds.
NF low rings, so just under an inch IIRC. Yes, I like it. Mil-XT is a great reticle.
Thanks for the info, I’ll be using the same rings so 19 Mils should get me to 350 comfortably which is what I shoot the most. Holdover at 425 will be good practice.
The Mil-XT makes holdover extremely easy and fast. I often use it instead of dialing to save time on certain stages and I'm almost to the point of not dialing at all for many stages.
