• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Nightforce against the world

Does anyone have an opinion on March scopes? I shoot with a NF 5-25 ATAKR, but thinking about a March 10-60 x 56 with the High Master glass.
 
The March 10-60 is a SFP scope that is designed for, and excels in, F-Class style shooting. The High Master glass is very nice indeed and gives the pop factor we gave, but makes shooting is heavy mirage a lot easier than other brands.

I have my two NXS 22x that I used to love, and want to love, because I don't want to sell two to buy one new scope. Lowlight's explanation on page 1 helps me understand the lens challenge I had trying to find a deer that was "popping" in the Leica binos that are filtered differently.
 
I had a March FX 5-40x56. In a side by side comparison with S&B and Premier 5-25's, and all three set at 25x, the March was on top. However, at that level of glass with those three scopes, your just splitting hairs.
 
They all have gone up $500 since last year. There were sub $3000 Nightforce, kahles and others. But i think those days are over. At least for 34mm alpha
 
Switching between different reticles isn't as bad as you'd think.
Most modern reticles are very similar these day with .2mil holds throughout, very few reticles have a bunch if weird subtensions that require you to memorize them.

If you are dead set on sticking with one reticle to simplify life Vortex is your best bet.
Diamondback Tac, Strike Eagle, PST, Razor and AMG all have the same reticle and offer price points from 400USD up to 2000USD.
There are dealers who ship internationally who will likely be a far better price than your local pricing (as your Kahles example shows).
Athlon as well and I have no complaints (Argos, Ares and Cronus)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MLS2GO
Well atleast they have something in common with Nightforce.

Most here saw the drama that went on last year with the vet who tried to get NF to fix his defective optic for like a year. Had to sue them and then they scrubbed evidence of it most likely as part of a NDA.

Kahles has MUCH better reticles and IMO, better glass. They are also roughly the same price for similar type optics. I would go Kahles all things being equal but everyone likes a different flavor of ice cream. Variety is the spice of life.

Pepridge farms remembers.
I haven’t had my daily fill of drama yet. Care to elaborate?
 
A buddy of mine is a dealer for Kahles and even though the the Kahles is optically superior to the Nightforce he keeps telling me that I should just buy a nightforce and be done with it.

Until he became a Kahles rep, he was exclusively using Nightforce on every gun he shot.

My current scope line up has my Meopta ZD as my top scope, and everything else pales in comparison.

What would you do?
I own Nightforce Swarovski, Vortex, Leupold, Schmidt & Bender, Nikon, Red Field and Nikon. Of the above named, I always purchase the best of the brand. Until recently I was content with both the Nightforce and Vortex. I liked my Swarovski and Schmidt & Bender just fine. The FFP scopes are best for long range and target shooting. But There is no comparison between any of the others and Kahles! End of story... that said the Kahles is almost double the price in most cases except my Nightforce and it is still $1400.00 more money. Is it worth $1400.00 more? No, unless you are shooting long range competition... buy a Nightforce or Vortex
 
I’ve never owned either Kahles or Nightforce so I can’t speak to them however the Leupold MkV HD 7x35x56, now that’s a great scope and of course the old school mkIV ultra with lazer etched mil dot reticle is bad ass!
 
Wow what a debate ! not that I'm surprised, as a Brit I have to say Nightforce would be my last choice the reason, price in the UK. The top end models are from 3 grand to just over 4 grand a discounted S&B is in the region of 2.2 grand, so all mine are all S&B's. I worked for a UK rifle builder and have used just about every top end scope there is, there isn't a great deal of difference between them optically. So it is down to personnel choice, which does your eyesight perceive to be better. To be honest I prefer the Vortex gen 2 Razor to my S&B's optically but tracking wise and reliability ? by the way Razors and S&B's are the same price in the UK. Maybe now we have left the evil EU empire prices may change.
 
I own Nightforce Swarovski, Vortex, Leupold, Schmidt & Bender, Nikon, Red Field and Nikon. Of the above named, I always purchase the best of the brand. Until recently I was content with both the Nightforce and Vortex. I liked my Swarovski and Schmidt & Bender just fine. The FFP scopes are best for long range and target shooting. But There is no comparison between any of the others and Kahles! End of story... that said the Kahles is almost double the price in most cases except my Nightforce and it is still $1400.00 more money. Is it worth $1400.00 more? No, unless you are shooting long range competition... buy a Nightforce or Vortex
I've owned many you listed as well as others, but I find the contrast much better in my NF than the others.
Definitely wasn't impressed with the Kahles after buying it...
 
Dude his mate's rate is kind of shit, the problem is for his country he is the only importer. The cost of export after he has to import it is really high, I can order one cheaper from my guy in Germany or through Euro Optic or Cameraland NY by calling.

That and his smoking hot wife just left him after he caught her in a train with 3 dudes. He needs some slack.
Pics of the smoking hot wife or this thread is dead to me!
 
Pics of the smoking hot wife or this thread is dead to me!

I'd love to help you out, but it isn't my wife (not that I would post photos of my wife) and I don't have any photos of her. Her sister was a figure competitor in New Zealand, but she went back in the military and had to take all her slutty photos down.
 
If you google Christine McQeen the infamous Australian escort, they are VERY similar looking. Enough that it caused problems for her travelling.
 
If you google Christine McQeen the infamous Australian escort, they are VERY similar looking. Enough that it caused problems for her travelling.

Looks like she needs cleaned. Not in a good way

F937B378-F8C6-47A1-8786-57F7098E8DE3.jpeg
 
Looks like she needs cleaned. Not in a good way

View attachment 7540365


She was on TV all the time when I lived in Australia. Celebrity whore of the year or something. She tried to sue one of her johns for alimony, even though they were never married and she never lived with him. He paid for it for several years and she decided she was entitled.

I saw her on a Ricky Lake type Australian show with her kids, and the son was talking about killing himself because all his school mates knew his mom was a whore.

She looks amazing with makeup and slut clothes. But she looks like she was shaken out of a trailer park in Apalachia when she isn't so made up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deersniper
I purchased a used Kahles Gen 1 624i a while back off Ebay . There is nothing wrong with the scope but I just wanted to be proactive in the event something was to go wrong shit happens. I asked Kahles the process for a scope to be repaired. Kahles wanted to know who I had purchased it from, and if they register it? They would have to contact the previous owner by serial number or the last one to register it not saying how long it would be if they could not contact them bla bla bla Then once that was verified to their liking. It would take an additional two or three months to get it back. "Geez" Knowing that now, I NEVER would have purchased it.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: deersniper
When Kahles shits the bed, as they did with the gen1 and gen2 K624i series, they refuse to acknowledge or address it. For that singular reason, I will never again buy a Kahles anything. I've dealt with many companies that have screwed things up; and with the exception of Trijicon (tri-power, SRS, early RMRs), no one has ever been as jackass about it.
That, and Nightforce just straight-up work. The Beast had an annoyance, and a few others have had minor issues (early electronic illumination controls), but Nightforce generally gets it right or makes it right.

Most people that have played this game for awhile have a list of "no fucking way" products or makers. I know of several who have Kahles on that list, but don't know of any who have Nightforce on that list.

Mileage varies.


Leland T

Private​

Minuteman
Select showcase achievements


I purchased a used Kahles Gen 1 624i a while back off Ebay . There is nothing wrong with the scope but I just wanted to be proactive in the event something was to go wrong shit happens. I asked Kahles the process for a scope to be repaired. Kahles wanted to know who I had purchased it from, and if they register it? They would have to contact the previous owner by serial number or the last one to register it not saying how long it would be if they could not contact them bla bla bla Then once that was verified to their liking. It would take an additional two or three months to get it back. "Geez" Knowing that now, I NEVER would have purchased it.
 
A buddy of mine is a dealer for Kahles and even though the the Kahles is optically superior to the Nightforce he keeps telling me that I should just buy a nightforce and be done with it.

Until he became a Kahles rep, he was exclusively using Nightforce on every gun he shot.

My current scope line up has my Meopta ZD as my top scope, and everything else pales in comparison.

What would you do?
I have used both and own neither. That said the Kahles is nice overall but not superior to the Nightforce if we are talking about the Atacr. We can argue about features and turrets but as far as glass quality the NF Atacr is in my opinion the best. We recently had the chance to test and use the NF and Kahles at ranges out to a mile against the two scopes I presently own in that class the Mark 5 and Athlon Cronus. In full disclosure I have always favored Leupold and own several including the above mentioned Mark 5 and a Mark 4. That said I have owned several German scopes in the past. They are nice! However, getting the opportunity to look thru and shoot the above mentioned four the NF had the best glass clarity followed by the Athlon if there was any discernable difference, both are Japanese made optics possible made by the same OEM. The Leupold was a very close third and appeared to be brighter but not as clear. With the NF and Cronus gen 2 you could litterally see the veins running in leaves at distance behind targets. The Kahles was fourth. My draw back to the NF is I don't like the reticle. I prefer the Leupold or a standard mil dot. Don't get me wrong you cannot I believe go wrong with any of these choices. They are all excellent optics, which should be the case with those costing 2k+. Pick one and go with it. If pure clarity is the scale to go by buy the NF. It is the best IMHO.
 
A buddy of mine is a dealer for Kahles and even though the the Kahles is optically superior to the Nightforce he keeps telling me that I should just buy a nightforce and be done with it.

Until he became a Kahles rep, he was exclusively using Nightforce on every gun he shot.

My current scope line up has my Meopta ZD as my top scope, and everything else pales in comparison.

What would you do?
You said: “even though the the Kahles is optically superior to the Nightforce.” First off, they are both SOLID optics for the money - please do some more research and speak with those who actually used these optics, for an even more robust perspective if possible.

Now as for which one to get, for my money, I’d go with a Schmidt & Bender as my first choice, and a Leupold Gold Ring as my second, over either of the optics you spoke on. I’m speaking strictly here on glass quality at high magnifications (where one truly can appreciate the quality most easily).

Best of success in your research and purchase!
~Scot
USMC 0326/8541
 
I own Nightforce Swarovski, Vortex, Leupold, Schmidt & Bender, Nikon, Red Field and Nikon. Of the above named, I always purchase the best of the brand. Until recently I was content with both the Nightforce and Vortex. I liked my Swarovski and Schmidt & Bender just fine. The FFP scopes are best for long range and target shooting. But There is no comparison between any of the others and Kahles! End of story... that said the Kahles is almost double the price in most cases except my Nightforce and it is still $1400.00 more money. Is it worth $1400.00 more? No, unless you are shooting long range competition... buy a Nightforce or Vortex
I own Nightforce Swarovski, Vortex, Leupold, Schmidt & Bender, Nikon, Red Field and Nikon. Of the above named, I always purchase the best of the brand. Until recently I was content with both the Nightforce and Vortex. I liked my Swarovski and Schmidt & Bender just fine. The FFP scopes are best for long range and target shooting. But There is no comparison between any of the others and Kahles! End of story... that said the Kahles is almost double the price in most cases except my Nightforce and it is still $1400.00 more money. Is it worth $1400.00 more? No, unless you are shooting long range competition... buy a Nightforce or Vortex
You should check the pricing for the Schmidt & Bender PMII 5x25x56 USMC - it’s going for around $800.00 (USD) than the similar Kahles these days (H37 Illum. reticle).

Source: europotics.com

...stay safe,

~Scot
USMC 0326/8541
 
Last edited:
I spent the day running around town looking at scopes. Sportsmans Warehouse had a Leupold Mark 5 5-25, and a $950 Riton, and a couple of ATACRs.

Riton sucked by comparison, but I am sure it would have been ok if a guy wasn't looking at the $3000 range rifle scopes.

My gunsmith had both an ATACR, a Mark 5 and a Schmidt. The only thing I didn't like about the Schmidt was the tunnelling at 5 power, he said his was an older model and the current Schmidts didn't do that.

I also found two cans of powder, so it was a good day.
 
The only thing I didn't like about the Schmidt was the tunnelling at 5 power, he said his was an older model and the current Schmidts didn't do that.
Just to be clear, all Schmidt PMII 5-25’s tunnel old and new, they have not changed the design that I am aware, but the 3-20 and 3-27, and other newer Schmidt designs do not suffer from the tunneling effect the 5-25 does.
 
I’ve been away for a minute and I’m prepared for my lashing... but did USO fall off the face of the earth?
 
I’ve been away for a minute and I’m prepared for my lashing... but did USO fall off the face of the earth?
They’ve moved, had different ownership and generally struggled the past few years, but they are still on the earth 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: flysolo
I call BS on that. Especially since they are both here as commercial supporters. Search for threads calling out how good Jason @jb1000br and Doug @gr8fuldoug are. CS is how you get customers and get them to return. Good CS doesn't cost money. Good CS is how you make money.

So nobody feels left out others that are great as well are @CSTactical, @LibertyOptics, and @Mile High Shooting. All are in no particular order. (If I forgot anybody else I'm sorry).
I agree, i've done business with a couple you've mentioned and have nothing but good to say about them. Having a business of my own, even though small in comparison with these guys, i know how important CS is. Nothing worse or better than word of mouth advertisement
 
Don't argue buy a Nightforce. I recommend you buy a NX8 2.5-20x50 F1. Great virtually for every and any shooting enviroment.
Yea unless you get a defective one and you have to spend a year fighting Nightforce and finally have to sue them to make it right...........

Ask Idaho about it ( which he probably won't due to a probable NDA)


 
Last edited:
The point is nightforce is not some God Status optic company.

They make shit like everyone else in the same price range.

However there have been more than a few reports of them not providing customer service and blaming everything on mounting when its clear the optic is defective.

Never had that issue with companies like Vortex, Bushnell or S&B when i had issues. They either fixed or replaced them at no cost and quick turn around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kayakshotz
Being a relative poor (2 Cabelas deal MK5's, 2 SHV's and a Gen2 Razor from SH classifieds) the only consensus I get from these optics threads is there never appears to be a consensus....well that plus I want an ATACR real bad.

I enjoy the hell outta reading them though....
 
I helped a buddy of mine put together his bolt action set up. He has went with the NF ATACRF1. I have the Vortex Razor HD Genii. I dont have any experience with the Kahles. At the range looking through both scopes the NF was literally a hair better in that the glass handled resolution just every so slightly better on a hot summer day. They are so damn close. If I did have a cool 3k laying around to blow on a scope I would def buy a NF