Re: Nikon Monarch 4X16 42 mm Mil Dot
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ark. Trapper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ok Guys I'm looking over scopes for my new rifle and have pretty much settled on the Monarch 4X16 42mm with Mil Dot reticle and a Kenton Industries elevation turret. I'd like to know how you folks like your Monarchs. The good
and the bad
, I want to hear it all. I've got a 4.5X14 Buckmaster that I really like. Thanks in advance. </div></div>
Trapper,
I'm not going to try to talk into or out of buying what you like. The particular Monarch your looking at has some good features; Very good to excellent glass, and a good price point $450.ish....
The bad:
Nikon has some of the most insipid customer service in the Optics industry. As a company they don't really seem to care, their CS employees don't seem care; there attitude is you bought it, so what do you want us to do about it????
Moving on, with only 40 MOA of adjustment in the Monarch 4-16, you'd better hope you don't need more than 20 MOA to get where you going. Even the standard 20 MOA base cannot help you get there, because you cannot get a 100 yd zero in a 40 MOA scope with a 20 MOA base.
In my view, unless your shooting a laser, to comfortably to reach 600 yds. and beyond, you need a scope that starts with at least 50 MOA of adjustment. Yes, with a real flat shooting round, you can get to 600 with less than 20 MOA, but how much of that 20 MOA are you going to lose just sighting in? So why push it.
There is a boatload of scopes, under $600. that have at least 50 MOA, including ones with the Nikon name on them, if that's what you fancy . Now go find them......
IMHO, YMMV....