Forbes: Democratic Mayors Defunded Their Police, While Spending Millions On Their Own Police Protection
Critics ask, Why does protection for the people matter less?
- Thread starter VA-Varminter
- Start date
Damn... Lightfoot's security is pulling $150k a piece? That's more than the average attorney nowadays.
It takes a little more to get people to go against their own principles.
But they always will for the right amount, up to and including hauling you off to a camp... there have been examples in history...
How many cops that enforced unconstitutional Covid BS made 150k?
Or enforced “gun control”
Or manned those anti 4A roadblocks many states have
Or red flag laws
Or... etc
How folks are NOT supportive of defunding the police is beyond me, and I mean actually defunding, not the current pandering
And it’s not like they have a duty to protect you anyways, per the Supreme Court. Reduce police size by 80% remove qualified immunity, make a centralized database for police misconduct, terminations, unjustified shootings and complaints, require departments to sign that they searched said database before hire date. Take all that money and invest in EMS, frankly EMS should have always been a better paying gig than being a state enforcer, more people will find their salvation at the hands of EMS vs PD
And it’s not like they have a duty to protect you anyways, per the Supreme Court. Reduce police size by 80% remove qualified immunity, make a centralized database for police misconduct, terminations, unjustified shootings and complaints, require departments to sign that they searched said database before hire date. Take all that money and invest in EMS, frankly EMS should have always been a better paying gig than being a state enforcer, more people will find their salvation at the hands of EMS vs PD
That's the problem with politicians , none of them should have protection except for the President. If they didn't have body guards they would think twice about proposing any of their half witted ideas and agendas against the other side in terms of self preservation. If your job to to govern people then you would do it properly and inclusive to all. Debate and compromise would be used to keep the peace . Using personal security to govern with is just short of being a dictator which actually does need security to stay in power and alive due to being a dictator. Our elected officials shouldn't be afforded the security trappings of a dictator.
Quite frankly, their protection details are useless if someone skilled wants itForbes: Democratic Mayors Defunded Their Police, While Spending Millions On Their Own Police Protection
Critics ask, Why does protection for the people matter less?www.openthebooks.com
I was thinking in terms of foreign threats.
They can take their chances like everyone else. Besides, foreign governments know that they will be found out if they try and that it will mean annihilation.
Also worse case just elect another one, they are all kinda the same when the rubber meets the road anyways
Similar threads
