• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Now The Crazy Motherfuckers Want to Spray Sunscreen Into Atmosphere

Tucker301

Groundskeeper
Banned !
Feb 13, 2015
9,494
23,358
Southern VA
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6422475/Stop-global-warming-dimming-SUN.html


Stop global warming by dimming the SUN! UV-blocking aerosols could be sprayed into the stratosphere by 2033 (but some warn the results will be 'catastrophic')
  • Global warming could be cut in half, says study by Harvard and Yale universities
  • Scientists say they will use high-altitude aircraft, balloons or large naval guns
  • Sceptics say that the hypothetical is costly and ' more risky over the long run'
  • There are potentially extreme risks including droughts or extreme weather
By VICTORIA BELL FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 12:32 EST, 23 November 2018 | UPDATED: 13:05 EST, 23 November 2018

Scientists are proposing an unproven way to tackle climate change by spraying sun-dimming chemicals into the Earth's atmosphere.

A technique known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) could cut the rate of global warming in half, they say.

The research was led by scientists at Harvard and Yale universities and published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

The idea would involve spraying large amounts of sulphate particles into the Earth's lower stratosphere at altitudes as high as 12 miles.

The scientists say they will deliver the sulphates with specially designed high-altitude aircraft, balloons or large naval-style guns.

The report does, however, acknowledge that the technique is purely hypothetical right now.

There is no existing technology or aircraft suitable for adaptation but the team say the system could be created in 15 years time.

They say they are 'developing a new, purpose-built tanker with 'substantial payload capabilities' and would neither be 'technologically difficult nor prohibitively expensive.'

The cost of launching the SAI system is estimated at £2.7 billion ($3.5 bn) with running costs of £1.7 billion ($2.25 bn) a year.

'We make no judgment about the desirability of SAI,' the report states.

'We simply show that a hypothetical deployment program commencing 15 years hence, while both highly uncertain and ambitious, would indeed be technically possible from an engineering perspective. It would also be remarkably inexpensive.'

The team acknowledge that there would be extreme risks with the hypothetical system.

Coordination between multiple countries in both hemispheres would be required.

Aside from that they say the SAI techniques could jeopardise agriculture, lead to droughts or cause extreme weather.

Dr Gergot Wagner from Harvard University's School of Engineering and co-author of the study said: 'Given the potential benefits of halving average projected increases in radiative forcing from a particular date onward, these numbers invoke the ''incredible economics'' of solar geoengineering.

'Dozens of countries could fund such a program, and the required technology is not particularly exotic.'
 
I was under the impression this was already what people claim was being done with chemtrails?
It would be a bit disappointing if the government is not already capable of doing this wouldn't it be?
 
Liberal “scientists”: “Human beings are responsible for climate change!”

Also liberal “scientists”:“Hey let’s pump the atmosphere which chemicals to change the climate”
 
It’s already there!

It’s called water vapor!!!

You know how I know they have no idea what they are talking about? When they say “man made pollution” is the number one driver in climate change.

Bull crap.

It’s the sun and water vapor. Solar energy and the oceans.

Plus, they just built the NCAR super computer here in Cheyenne to study the sun. Why? Because they said they don’t understand it enough, but magically they understand our climate before they understand the biggest influence?

Their agenda is showing, they might want to tuck it back in
 
Why? Because they said they don’t understand it enough, but magically they understand our climate before they understand the biggest influence?

Minor technicality, but I believe the trick there is they understand our climate enough to know that statistics can be employed in order to blow smoke up the asses of millions of retards and get tons of dollars for it.

"If we tell people that their way of life is fucking up their way of life, they'll want solutions. Solutions cost dollars. Dollars that they will give to us for our solution that fucks up their way of life."
 
I thought aerosol vapors were bad. Wasn't that why all the 80s rock bands were seen as killing the atmosphere from hairspray? Thats it. Im going to let my hair grow out and learn to play guitar and start a new 80s style band.
 
“The idea would involve spraying large amounts of sulphate particles into the Earth's lower stratosphere at altitudes as high as 12 miles.

The scientists say they will deliver the sulphates with specially designed high-altitude aircraft, balloons or large naval-style guns.”

Let’s see now... Haven’t they been spending billions to force power companies, car companies and truck manufacturers to reduce/eliminate sulfates in their emissions? Hasn’t that been going on for almost 50 years? Maybe that effort is the real cause for their global warming trend? So, maybe they have been right all along when saying that man has caused global warming. It’s been the pollution laws that did it...lol!

See how easy it is to fake cause and effect? Especially when the target is everyday people/masses.

For a mere (cheap at double the price) $1 billion, I will travel to Washington to help strike down all those onerous anti-pollution laws that caused this nasty warming trend. Less than half the price of the Hawvahd solution.
 
Except that "Global Warming" has flat lined years ago. We may be entering a cooling period soon.

Never mind that the Earth has warmed and cooled over eons with zero influence from man. Cooler than now and warmer than now. Much warmer in fact. They credit the cooling of the climate with the fall of the Roman Empire and the Dark Ages.
 
When someone believes (bih-leef - to have faith in something with no evidence) in AGCC the first question I ask is, "How much of the atmosphere is CO2?" 99% of them have no idea it's a trace gas. The vast majority answer between 5%-20%. They don't understand it's 400 ppm, or about .04% (.0004). Without going to ACTUAL green house gasses, their percentages, and their physical ability to trap heat, it is absurd on it's face to believe that the largest observable natural system is controlled by .0004 of itself even if it's ability to trap heat was vastly outsized by it's actual amount in the composition of the atmosphere.
Unfortunately for believers, it's much less of a greenhouse gas than water vapor and a variety of other trace gasses even in increased amounts...

The whole thing is completely absurd on it's face. The Emperor wears no cloths.

None, NONE!!!!, of the models include the sun, making them all pure fantasy. You see, they had no choice. This trace gas was the only one that humanity really effected. It was the only area where what we did made any difference or had any impact even at the PPM level. It appears that it didn't matter. What matters is that every "solution" believers propose is raw totalitarianism. So now you know why they believe and perpetuate the myth.

The Earth's climate changes. AGCC is a fantasy, as is carbon dioxide is the driving force behind climate change. Period.