OAL measure Question

Mike McBride

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Oct 25, 2012
37
1
69
Houston
I have a question on finding the lands to seat the bullet according to ogive to land spacing instead of the actual OAL out of the manual. I fully understand why we want to do this, but am less clear on the how. Or rather how to get an accurate measurement.

One method I read would have me basically seat a bullet into a dummy case by closing the bolt and pushing the bullet into the lands. I found this method fairly efficient at getting bullets stuck in the barrel, but that is not what I was after. If I wanted to do that, it would be more fun to just forget putting powder in a primed case. If one opens up the case neck enough so that the bullet doesn’t engrave itself into the lands, then it shifts around so easy that the measurement is untrustworthy.

Another method I have read but not tried would have me close the bolt on an empty chamber, shove a cleaning rod down the muzzle and mark the muzzle to boltface distance. Then I would seat a bullet in a dummy case, but sticking way out. Then I would close the bolt, but not completely and hold it in place with a bungee cord while I mark the distance from the muzzle to the bullet tip on the cleaning rod. After taking the difference of the cleaning rod measurements, I would then have to seat the bullet precisely to this overall length and measure to the ogive with a comparator. This method seems cheap and easy which is always good, unless of course you are ready to get married. It does seem to have opportunity for measurement error though.

Then, there is this Hornady OAL gauge of which many on this forum seem to think highly. I do understand the concept, however am not clear on how to arrive at a precise head to ogive measurement. The modified brass should give a pretty close measurement of the shoulder to ogive, but how does one account for the difference in head to shoulder lengths?

Actually, I am not even real certain how to measure the thing in the first place regardless of the case length issue. It is my understanding that the bullet slips in the neck easily so that one has tactile feedback when the threaded rod pushes the bullet to the lands. Once you lock the rod in place, remove it and the bullet, and then seat the bullet against the rod, you still have a big bolt sticking out the back. How do you get your caliper with comparator attached square across it to make a measurement?
 
Re: OAL measure Question

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: OlTexasBoy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Then, there is this Hornady OAL gauge of which many on this forum seem to think highly. I do understand the concept, however am not clear on how to arrive at a precise head to ogive measurement. The modified brass should give a pretty close measurement of the shoulder to ogive, but how does one account for the difference in head to shoulder lengths?

Actually, I am not even real certain how to measure the thing in the first place regardless of the case length issue. It is my understanding that the bullet slips in the neck easily so that one has tactile feedback when the threaded rod pushes the bullet to the lands. Once you lock the rod in place, remove it and the bullet, and then seat the bullet against the rod, you still have a big bolt sticking out the back. How do you get your caliper with comparator attached square across it to make a measurement?
</div></div>

To start with, the measurement is done with the bolt/bolt carrier removed from the rifle. It helps to have a wooden dowel to insert in the barrel to get more consistent readings as you can poke the bullet out until you get it in the lands by feel consistently. You then pull the OAL gauge from the rifle and use a caliper to measure.

Your concern regarding head to shoulder length differences is noted. Hornady offers a service to modify your fire formed brass to work with the tool or you can modify your own. I've found the curved tool a bit easier to work with if it will work in your application.

Refer to Instruction Page for a more detailed explanation.
 
Re: OAL measure Question

Hey thanks. Their instructions show calipers attached to a comparator with the bolt still attached. I guess it does not cock the caliper off too much to matter, eh?

It also said to use a headspace gauge to compare the lengths of a fired case from your rifle to the modified case and just add the difference. That was sort of a duh. I have to remember sometimes that if I don't use my brain I may as well just have two asses.

Thanks for the link, though it is hard to admit I read the instructions.
 
Re: OAL measure Question

Regarding the picture, you may be confusing the OAL gauge tool with the bolt. The tool provides provision for a caliper to measure the length with the modified case attached. The object at the bullet end is a comparator for that caliber to get a measurement to the bullet's ogive.

To see it in action, [video:youtube]http://youtu.be/WCPgKNp8i7o[/video]
 
Re: OAL measure Question

If you have a neck sizer, barely bump the neck until a bullet just slides in with a little finger pressure. Now you can close the bolt without sticking the bullet into the rifling. A black marker to color the bullet will let you see that your on the lands.
 
Re: OAL measure Question

Yeah, well I wasn't really confused. I didn't mean the rifle bolt. The OAL tool has that long threaded rod so I was calling that a bolt. It is a case of questionable vernacular. Down here in South Texas we tend to take liberties with the Queen's English.
 
Re: OAL measure Question

Thanks again. That video made it perfectly clear. Had I actually seen one of the tools up close and noticed the recess made for the caliper jaws there wouldn't have been an issue.
 
Re: OAL measure Question

You're welcome. I figured the video would illustrate what would have taken many more words to get across. I thought you may have meant the tool insert when you read bolt but didn't know for sure. On the straight version of the tool, it is really what looks like a plastic rod riding in the sleeve while on the curved version it is more like a metal linkage cable riding inside. As noted, I prefer the curved version which seems to lock in place better and has a better feel about it so long as it fits you rifle.