Re: Opinions on Atlas bipod?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kill_goose</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ive said it before and ill say it again, 9" bipods are not tall enough for real shooting in the field.
I love my 6-9" Harris for bench shooting, but when it comes killing time, the 9-13" goes on.
Until Atlas makes a longer unit, its a no go at my station.</div></div>
You know what they say about opinions...
Several schools of thought on this. One I'm familiar with says it's a bolt gun, it doesn't have a 30 round mag sticking out the bottom, you want as stable a platform as possible as low to the ground as possible. A 6-9 is more than adequate to this task.
I've used Harris bipods for years, got my first Atlas at the recommendation of a friend/fellow shooter and against that of a friend who owns a training facility (he teaches FBI, SWAT, regularly places first in regional shoots like ASC, and routinely outshoots Marine snipers at Quantico, so I take him to be somewhat of an expert - but hell, he can't know EVERYthing, right?) and am finding it's awkward to use compared to the harris. I shoot prone for long-range. The Harris loads up directly when you dig your belt buckle into the ground for leverage but I find myself pushing into the Atlas too much, it takes too much time to get the thing PLANTED, and I'm having to futz around with shoulder, feet, waist to get solidly in place and it's too TALL on the lowest setting so I have to extend and angle the legs which then makes for an even LESS stable platform. I tried the little rubber feet and they didn't dig in as well as Harris', I'm using the cupped metal feet with some success, and even bought the spikes to try, but it's not looking good at this point.
I'm kind of in agreement with Luky here. This is simply overengineered, too cute by half, neither tactical nor practical, but I've got a lot more money invested in ONE Atlas than TWO Harris bipods and it doesn't work half as well.
YMMV.